Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
1 Was in the Mayweather Mafia.
3 Were not.
The one that was...WAS IN THE MAYWEATHER MAFIA WHEN YOU ACCEPTED HIM.
HE WAS ALSO IN THE MAYWEATHER MAFIA WHEN YOU ACCEPTED HIM AS YOUR FRIEND. AND HE IS STILL ON YOUR FRIEND LIST TODAY YOU SQUIRMING SACK OF SHlT
I don't know who is friends with whom because I never looked into who is friends. Who the fvvck cares? I'm a Mayweather fan and I'm friends with Zaroku. It hasn't stopped us from having our own opinion. That you will consistently try to say that these guys lied and cheated for me is what really makes this hysterical
I accepted AFTER his vote was already sent. AND SO DID YOU, YOU MORON. IN FACT, YOU TRIED TO CONVINCE HIM TO CHANGE HIS VOTE!
MENTION WHAT???? I DID RESEARCH ON ALL OF THE JUDGES AND I SHARED WITH YOU THE INFORMATION THAT I FOUND. IT'S NOT UP TO ME TO LOOK INTO WHO THEY ARE FRIENDS WITH AND SHARE IT WITH YOU. IF THAT CONCERNS YOU THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE LOOKED INTO IT. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ACCEPTED THEM. NO ONE FORCED YOU TO DO SO.
ACCEPTED WHAT? I ACCEPTED THEIR JUDGMENT, WHICH IS WHAT YOU AGREED TO DO BUT THEN SAID THAT THEY WERE EITHER TOO DUMB OR CHEATED. LOL. YOU ARE SUCH A FVVVCKING CRYING BABY.
YES, YOU WANT TO DISQUALIFY YOURSELF FOR CHOOSING THEM RATHER THAN ACCEPTING A LOSS OF 4-0.
WHATEVER FLOATS YOUR BOAT. You're still a grown man crying.I would be allowed to decline "Spoonie," right????? Just like you were allowed to decline and DID decline some posters.
1. You already stated you had no problem with Billeau and don't believe he cheated.
2. You stated you had no problem with Zaroku and don't believe he cheated.
3. You stated you had no problem with Willy Wanker and don't believe he cheated.
YOU JUST STATED THAT YOU THINK THEY MISUNDERSTOOD YOU. LMAOOOO. NO. THEY JUST THOUGHT YOU WERE WRONG. IT'S OVER!
Yawn ..... zzzzzzzzzzzzz
I found out after the fact. So I went further than declined. Got it?
It's you and Shoulder Roll that are still talking about points! I'm way over it! I have not brought up this "points" discussion it was you 2. So look in the mirror when you talk about crying.
I'm just responding to you 2 crying.
From my end it's so simple. Easy as pie.
YOU were DQd, Travestyny.
I'm just being nice enough to respond to that nonsense! You want to stop talking about the points? No problem!!!!
You still do not get the differences between threshold substance and threshold tests! Those judges unfortunately didn't either so you deserve those points!
On my end, I'm sticking to what Dr Catlin said, Dr Segura and WADA documents mention. They will not try to tell me ******ity such as:
- there are no thresholds, ratios none of that .....
Then switch it up once I show you proof and say it was not about that!!!
or
- It was not about the intensities of the bands when it was!!!
or
- DEFLECTING and avoiding that ABP has threshold tests!
or
- You say that cannot include ABP now that you finally admitted it has threshold tests. You slipped and revealed that it does have thresholds. Remember that discussion we had about HT blood test that had threshold that you said that was "old" to bring it up. now WADA doesn't have those type of thresholds? Always moving the goal-posts but you know that you are wrong! WADA has those type of tests and more! LOL
or
- tell me that I will never be able to prove that non-threshold substances have threshold type tests! I did prove you WRONG!
or
- that WADA never had threshold tests for EPO. You were WRONG AGAIN!
Just think about it. BAP test is a threshold type test as per Dr Catlin and more. We both know that EPO is not a threshold substance. Put 1 + 1 and what do you have? A non-threshold substance that has threshold type test!!!! DING DING DING!!!!
I showed you proof of all that and more.
Just be honest for once!
You cannot even admit that YOU are WRONG because it is clear that you are because if you are NOT then the WADA EPO EXPERTs are and we both know that they are not. Stop playing DUMB!!!!
You just got destroyed these last few days.Go cry over some threshold substances or some points!!!
The nerve to then even bring up that score that means NOTHING compared to how you just got destroyed on that very same subject!!!!
.Last edited by ADP02; 07-09-2018, 02:36 AM.Comment
-
Yawn ..... zzzzzzzzzzzzz
I found out after the fact. So I went further than declined. Got it?
It's you and Shoulder Roll that are still talking about points! I'm way over it! I have not brought up this "points" discussion it was you 2. So look in the mirror when you talk about crying.
I'm just responding to you 2 crying.
BECAUSE YOU ARE THE ONE WHO WELCHED OUT ON POINTS YOU MORON. Of course you're not mentioning points because your butthurt ass acted like a complete bltch and refused to pay up!
You still do not get the differences between threshold substance and threshold tests! Those judges unfortunately didn't either so you deserve those points!
On my end, I'm sticking to what Dr Catlin said, Dr Segura and WADA documents mention. They will not try to tell me ******ity such as:
- there are no thresholds, ratios none of that .....
Then switch it up once I show you proof and say it was not about that!!!
or
- It was not about the intensities of the bands when it was!!!
or
- DEFLECTING and avoiding that ABP has threshold tests!
or
- You say that cannot include ABP now that you finally admitted it has threshold tests. You slipped and revealed that it does have thresholds. Remember that discussion we had about HT blood test that had threshold that you said that was "old" to bring it up. now WADA doesn't have those type of thresholds? Always moving the goal-posts but you know that you are wrong! WADA has those type of tests and more! LOL
Go ask WADA. They never labeled the BAP as a threshold test. The court case alone told you that. Stop fooling yourself. You tried so desperately to piggyback off of the BAP, and you got shut down there too. You had nowhere to turn so then you went back to the ABP, which you weren't pushing for until you were down 2-0. LMAOOOOOO. Squirming didn't help you, son. And no, you have no power to DQ anyone. Accept that loss, bltch.
So what was the threshold for the BAP, son? You tried to say 80, I told you that the court said there is NO NUMERICAL LIMIT, and then you went back to the ABP. LMAO!
Again, stop kidding yourself. You showed nothing and were shut down at EVERY TURN. EVERY SINGLE ONE. It was a masterclass by me, and a fvvck up so big by you, after your initial deflection, that you asked me for a draw. Remember that?
It's overrrrrrrr!!!!! 4-0 YOU BlTCH!!!!!
OH, AND THE NEXT TIME YOU BRING UP THOSE JUDGES, LET'S CALL THEM IN. I BET YOU'LL BE SAYING SOMETHING DIFFERENT WHEN THEY GET HERE!!!! Come on, ADP. Let's call them in and see what they have to say. Tell them they cheated for me directly to them. Deal? It's going to be great!!!!Last edited by travestyny; 07-09-2018, 06:27 AM.Comment
-
It seems like you just want to disagree. Got it!
You said that there was no ABP testing at that time. There was!
The interview was about testing for the upcoming Floyd vs Mosley fight and the issues with the Manny/Floyd negotiations of 2009/2010. Manny was OK with giving "urine" but was not OK with giving "blood".
Just be honest. You said that there was no ABP tests at the time. There was a ABP test set up for Haematological (blood) module and I even told you! If you want to say that there was no steroidal ABP test, well that is another story ... but you did not!
Even then, there were parts of that module too already being used. I'm sure that Tygart knew too!
.
Just admit you were wrong and acknowledge the FACT that you applied Tygarts 2010 interview to your "Floyd delayed" conspiracy OUT OF CONTEXT.
Smh.
As soon as you read "whizzinator" you should have known thats NOT ABP testing Tygart was referring to but instead the state commission test.Comment
Comment