Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

Vagisil is so afraid of me that he uses a picture of my post to quote me.

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

Vagisil still refusing to quote the three posters that asked him a question in here, but spamming a picture of a quotation because he knows he will get embarrassed

The saddest troll ever!!!

[Vadrigar.]

Watch and weep.

Floyd objectively lost.

[travestyny]

Max Kellerman: "No one really thinks Pacquiao won that fight."

[Vadrigar.]

Did he just admit to pu$$ying out? LMFAO yes he did.

He pu$$ied out.

The biatch pu$$ied out.

It's over.

Flawless victory.





















[img]https://media3.*****.com/media/oe33xf3B50fsc/200.gif[/img]

KABOOM!

[travestyny]

So in other words, me posting here frightens you. Is that why you use a picture of my post to quote me and refuse to respond to anyone who calls you out on it.

You are the saddest troll ever But I love that I ruined your life.

[Vadrigar.]

Watch and weep.

Floyd objectively lost.

[ADP02]

Can you read you imbecile? First of all I’m not wrong, as the court of arbitration for sport agrees with me, clown. But that’s not the point.

The point is what you are saying I’m wrong about is NOT even a part of EPO testing anymore, you clown.

How long are you going to duck this? Is the BAP in the WADA TD2014EPO document?????? Yes or no?

Stop ducking it, son


ADP WON’T ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR SOME REASONNNNN. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!



Oh, by the way:

WADA:



THE COURT AGREES WITH ME....AND WADA BOWS DOWN TO THE COURT. WHAT YOU GOT HIGHER THAN THAT, CLOWN?

Imbecile? Is this you DEFLECTING AGAIN? YES!!!


You have misinterpreted the panel's statements. It's clear. BOTH sides in that case call it a threshold test. WADA EXPERTS call it a threshold test.


SO YOU ARE WRONG!!!


Can you point to me where the CAS directly states that Travestyny is right? You cannot! Your head thinks that but it's that YOU read that statement from the panel and said "This is what it means ...... " BUT you have misinterpreted what the panel said!!!!



Can you point to me where the CAS directly tells WADA experts that they are wrong? You know, the same WADA experts who also are called upon to testify as EXPERTS in these cases? You cannot!


As I pointed out, some of those WADA experts are stating that there are threshold tests even years after that case. According to you Travestyny, those WADA experts are wrong. NO, YOU Travestyny are the one who is WRONG!!!!


It's that time again. Time for Travestyny to admit that YOU are WRONG and those WADA experts are right!!! Not that hard to do since they are the EXPERTs and you are NOT!!!!



So PLEASE STOP DEFLECTING to something else and respond to:


Who is right,
Travestyny or those WADA EXPERTS who said that they are threshold tests???






BTW - The odds are bad .... Everyone knows that you will NOT respond directly.

YOU WILL DEFLECT AGAIN!!!!

.

[ADP02]

Lmaooooo. I love that you are deflecting. This pleases me!!! WATCH ME KILL THIS NOISE YET AGAIN!!!!!

Go find what it says about the passport in the WADA TD2014EPO document. You are going to be sadly disappointed! Lmaoooooo

Nevermind. I'll post it up for you!



THE ONLY THING IS SAYS IS THAT DATA FROM TARGET TESTING EPO CAN BE ADDED TO THE BIOLOGICAL PASSPORT OR TO TESTIMONIES TO ESTABLISH RULE VIOLATIONS IN A GENERAL CONTEXT. BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH. YOU DUMB Bltch!!!!!! GENERAL.....NOT SPECIFIC....NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR ANY SUBSTANCE....NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR EPO...


Kindly point me to where in that document it says that you can use the ABP to specifically look for EPO?????!!! In fact, POINT ME WHERE IN THAT DOCUMENT IT SAYS YOU CAN USE THE ABP FOR EPO AT ALL....SINCE IT ONLY SAYS YOU CAN ADD DATA FROM TARGET TESTING TO THE ABP AND TO TESTIMONIES...YOU KNOW...IN A GENERAL SENSE...FOR UNSPECIFIED RULES VIOLATIONS. LMAOOOOO.




BECAUSE YOU DAMN SURE SAID YOUR THRESHOLD TESTING DATA MUST FINDS ARTIFICIAL EPO SPECIFICALLY, DIDN'T YOU?!!!!!



AND YOU SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THE WADA TD2014EPO DOCUMENT AS THE SCOPE. NOW YOU FIND THAT THE BAP THAT YOU KEEP HARPING ON ISN'T THERE, AND THE INFO. THAT YOU KEEP HARPING ON ABOUT THE ABP ISN'T THERE. BUT WE BOTH ALREADY KNEW THIS, DIDN'T WE. OR WERE YOU NOT PAYING ATTENTION WHEN I KICKED YOUR ASS 4-0???? POOR POOR ADP.

ARE YOU TIRED OF GETTING THE SHlT KICKED OUT OF YOU YET? GO AHEAD AND DUCK THIS LIKE YOU'VE DUCKED EVERY SINGLE OTHER POST OF MINE. I'M LOVING KNOWING THAT 4-0 ASSWHOOPIN STILL HAUNTS YOU. I TOL

OH...AND YOU'RE RIGHT...YOU DID SAY THERE WERE OTHER TESTS.....TOO BAD YOU SAID THEY TRY TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC EPO. LMAOOO. GIVE UP, DUDE.

Yawn ....

So you just learnt that there is DIRECT and INDIRECT testing for EPO testing? I never hid that from you in this thread or any thread. I actually clearly state that!!!!

So now that you are on board with that can we move on to does ABP testing use threshold type tests? YES!!!



I keep on presenting you with quotes that state that WADA uses ABP testing approach for EPO testing!!!! Sorry!!!


and yes as you have finally read, they do bring up even in that document that ABP is used for EPO testing. Why? You highlighted the wrong thing buddy!!!!

"to establish anti-doping rule violations. "


Even your friend DoNothing kept on stating that ABP testing would catch those who try to take synthetic EPO. Ooops!!!! ...

and ABP testing has threshold type tests!!!



BTW - Why don't you go to that thread and look up if I brought up ABP having thresholds? Oooops!!!!!


and that case that I quoted states that the ABP test results show that there is strong evidence that the athlete abused drugs by way of synthetic EPO!!!
Oooops!!!!!



KABADABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!


.