Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[bambam182]

when will you delusional ******s accept that pac got whooped.

he couldnt cut the ring off or fight on the inside.

[ADP02]

YES, ADP02 THE DEFLECTOR DID STRIKE AGAIN. WHAT THE ACTUAL **** DOES MY QUESTION HAVE TO DO WITH NICK DIAZ? LMAOOOOOO!

LOOK UP, BlTCH!


YOU ARE WRONGGGGG. LMAOOOOOOO. YOUR DUMB ASS CONSPIRACY THEORY IS DEAD. YOU ****ING IDIOT. NOW LOOK AT THOSE LINKS AND ADMIT YOU ARE WRONG.


LMAOOOOO! BIOTCHHHHHHH!!!!!


OR MAYBE YOU WANNA ANSWER NOW....:

IS EPO A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE????YES OR NO? LMAOOOOO!

I did look it up .... I explained it to you too. You just do not get it! Like everything else!

THINK! How can something (a urine sample) be "su****ious" unless there is a threshold? Ooops!

You cannot or can but now you just realized that YOU ARE WRONG!!!




.

[travestyny]

I did look it up .... I explained it to you too. You just do not get it! Like everything else!

THINK! How can something (a urine sample) be "su****ious" unless there is a threshold? Ooops!

You cannot or can but now you just realized that YOU ARE WRONG!!!




.

LMAOOOO. YOU ****ING IDIOT.


IT SAYS CLEARLY THAT ALL THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ON DECISION LIMITS.

Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau....0-2016-en.pdf

IS IT MEASURED QUANTITATIVELY? WHAT IS THE DECISION LIMIT FOR EPO?


Now tell me...for the last ****ing time:

IS EPO A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE??????


LMAOOOO. WHY WON'T YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION? IS IT BECAUSE...

YOU KNOW YOU ARE WRONG! LMAOOOO

[travestyny]

You cannot or can but now you just realized that YOU ARE WRONG!!!


.

OH I'M WRONG, HUH? LET'S SEE YOU PUT YOUR ACCOUNT WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS.

Once again...do you want to have this issue settled in the Thunderdome. You were willing to go over some petty "urine and blood are a minimal insignificant factor vs. no factor at all in dehydration," right? You said you wanted to go to the thunderdome over that dumb ass ******ed issue. I agreed, and you never moved to set it up. Probably because even you realize that it's the dumbest most ******ed issue you can concoct.

So now, since you were willing to go for that reason, do you want to have someone unbiased look at the WADA documents that I linked you to and decide if EPO is a threshold substance?

Let's watch you bltch out. What's your excuse for not wanting to go this route? I'm going to be laughing when you decline.

Just know that if you decline...lmaoooo. It's over for you. LMAOOOO! So what's it going to be?

Yes or no?

[ADP02]

Hmmm, maybe you still do not know about EPO?

My basic point in all of this was already stated multiple times. I know that you are just trying to DUCK/DEFLECT from your statement below:


Here is a definition of Threshold. Got it now? If you still need more info, I will be more than glad to provide it for you ..... see no DUCKING from me.

Threshold: The magnitude or intensity that must be exceeded for a certain reaction, phenomenon, result, or condition to occur or be manifested.




Can you now please respond to my previous post? Still calculating? Having trouble?

DUCKINGGGG!!!!!! YOU STILL DIDN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION.


IS.....EPO....A....THRESHOLD...SUBSTANCE!!!!!! LOOK AT YOU ****ING SQUIRMING.

AND STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE NARRATIVE. YOU SAID IT WAS A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE AS PER WADA. DON'T ****ING LIE. I HAVE THE QUOTATIONS!



WHAT LIST ARE YOU REFERRING TO? WADA'S LIST!!!!!



AND AGAIN, HERE IS WADA'S DEFINITION OF THRESHOLD, YOU ****ING CLOWN!

Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau....0-2016-en.pdf

AND WHAT THE **** ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY, IDIOT. YES. NON-THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES THAT ARE PRESENT WOULD BE FLAGGED! I ALREADY TOLD YOU. THEY LOOK FOR RECOMBINANT EPO. YOU JUST HAVE NO BRAIN!

EVEN BY YOUR ****ING DEFINITION, IT STILL DOESN'T FIT. SO AGAIN, FOR THE LAST TIME HOPEFULLY...


STOP ****ING DUCKING...IS EPO A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE!!!!????? YES OR NO?

Time for you to start running for the hills:

WADA
The detection of a “positive case” has been based on the ratio between the sum of the areas of all bands appearing in the P1 range of an rhEPO standard analysed in parallel and the sum of the areas of all bands.

Time for you to say that YOU ARE WRONG ... AGAIN!


.

[travestyny]

time for you to start running for the hills:


time for you to say that you are wrong ... Again!


.

Time for you to step up, son.


Thunderdome. Yes or no? Why are you hiding???? Lmaoooooo! Let's go, biotch. All my points and my sig vs. Yours. You down?


Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).[/COLOR]
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau....0-2016-en.pdf

Keep trying, ******. You won't win, because you are WRONG!

[travestyny]

Time for you to start running for the hills:


Time for you to say that YOU ARE WRONG ... AGAIN!


.

Still waitinggggggg....


What is the decision limit for EPO? You got it yet? LMAOOOOOO!


Are you willing to step up? I mean, a man who seems as confident as you do sure seems to be hesitant. What's up, homie? You down? Come on, ADP02. Let's get this over with. LMAOOOOO! Don't pvssy out now!

[ADP02]

Time for you to step up, son.


Thunderdome. Yes or no? Why are you hiding???? Lmaoooooo! Let's go, biotch. All my points and my sig vs. Yours. You down?


Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).[/COLOR]
https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau....0-2016-en.pdf

Keep trying, ******. You won't win, because you are WRONG!

Thunderdome?
You have nothing to go on buddy .... but I do!


"The tests, as applied for the past 16 years, target the known differences between human (endogenous) and recombinant EPO, the latter being the doping agent."

"If an athlete is under su****ion of taking EPO, they will then be given the urinary test and another complete blood test. To be declared positive, the blood test will have to show anomalous values and the urine test will have to show a percentage of basic isoforms greater than 80%.

This threshold means that the risk of a false positive is around 1 in 3000. Higher threshold values were discussed, but that would also make it harder to catch those who had taken artificial EPO. The average level of basic EPO isoforms in urine is only 28% in non-doped persons - 80% is seen as fairly generous, allowing for standard deviations. "


I told you the above days ago ... I was waiting for you to come back with something .... but you are Travestyny ... THE DEFLECTOR!!!

[travestyny]

Thunderdome?
You have nothing to go on buddy .... but I do!


"The tests, as applied for the past 16 years, target the known differences between human (endogenous) and recombinant EPO, the latter being the doping agent."

"If an athlete is under su****ion of taking EPO, they will then be given the urinary test and another complete blood test. To be declared positive, the blood test will have to show anomalous values and the urine test will have to show a percentage of basic isoforms greater than 80%.

This threshold means that the risk of a false positive is around 1 in 3000. Higher threshold values were discussed, but that would also make it harder to catch those who had taken artificial EPO. The average level of basic EPO isoforms in urine is only 28% in non-doped persons - 80% is seen as fairly generous, allowing for standard deviations. "


I told you the above days ago ... I was waiting for you to come back with something .... but you are Travestyny ... THE DEFLECTOR!!!

LMAOOOOOO.....


THEN LET'S GO. WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR. DO YOU AGREE?

[travestyny]

Thunderdome?
You have nothing to go on buddy .... but I do!


"The tests, as applied for the past 16 years, target the known differences between human (endogenous) and recombinant EPO, the latter being the doping agent."

"If an athlete is under su****ion of taking EPO, they will then be given the urinary test and another complete blood test. To be declared positive, the blood test will have to show anomalous values and the urine test will have to show a percentage of basic isoforms greater than 80%.

This threshold means that the risk of a false positive is around 1 in 3000. Higher threshold values were discussed, but that would also make it harder to catch those who had taken artificial EPO. The average level of basic EPO isoforms in urine is only 28% in non-doped persons - 80% is seen as fairly generous, allowing for standard deviations. "


I told you the above days ago ... I was waiting for you to come back with something .... but you are Travestyny ... THE DEFLECTOR!!!

LMAOOOOOO. DUDEEEEEE. TELLL ME YOU DID NOT JUST DO THAT!!!! LMAOOOO


YOU GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO NOVEMBER 2001????? LMAOOOOOOO. DUDEEEEE! YOU DO REALIZE YOUR INFORMATION IS FROM 15 YEARS AGO, RIGHT?

YOUR DESPERATION IS KILLING ME. LMAOOOOO! DO YOU AGREE? THUNDERDOME! LET'S GET IT ON.