Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

Thanks for seeing the quality of the thread shows how I speak the truth brotha'!

Cheers!

# Chronicles of the biggest scam in boxing history

You've been asking for awhile for someone to timestamp and show you the flaw in your videos. Though I've done that in the past, and you never really responded to it, I'd like to give you a prime example using this latest video that you've been pointing to.

Now, the first punch that the video credits Pacquiao with was definitely iffy and inconclusive. Ok fine. This picture is the 2nd punch that the video credits him with. The 2nd punch. Does this appear to be a scoring blow to you?

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-04%20at%208.04.43%20AM.png[/IMG]

Your whole "my compubox is better than your compubox" argument is a very poor one, especially when you consider that compubox is not how a boxing match is scored. In any event, you've been asking for timestamp and examples of what's wrong with your videos. This picture shows....a punch on the back? A punch on the lower part of the back of the shoulder? A punch on the kidney at best? What do you see here? Why was this credited as a scoring blow?

Looking for your honest assessment. Thanks.

[Spoon23]

You've been asking for awhile for someone to timestamp and show you the flaw in your videos. Though I've done that in the past, and you never really responded to it, I'd like to give you a prime example using this latest video that you've been pointing to.

Now, the first punch that the video credits Pacquiao with was definitely iffy and inconclusive. Ok fine. This picture is the 2nd punch that the video credits him with. The 2nd punch. Does this appear to be a scoring blow to you?

[IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-04%20at%208.04.43%20AM.png[/IMG]

Your whole "my compubox is better than your compubox" argument is a very poor one, especially when you consider that compubox is not how a boxing match is scored. In any event, you've been asking for timestamp and examples of what's wrong with your videos. This picture shows....a punch on the back? A punch on the lower part of the back of the shoulder? A punch on the kidney at best? What do you see here? Why was this credited as a scoring blow?

Looking for your honest assessment. Thanks.

Oh, TravestyNY is back in the fray.. Not that I'm expecting a good show from you this time..I highly doubt it, but let's see. You've never time stamped anything bud, but I did time stamp your nuts haha!

Oh, that pic doesn't really show the whole seen. Can't tell if that was a punch. Time stamp the sequence. Video below.



Here's the video of round 2. Now time stamp what you think will make a strong point about floyd winning that round.

I'm just here.

[Spoon23]

Whoa, people are still talking about this?

Yup, 138,000 boxing fans to date have seen this epic thread exposing a fraud. People can see a rigged fight a mile away..They want to be inform of the biggest sports scam in history and why Floyd roid didn't deserve a single penny of that 200 million dollars highway robbery were in he ran and hugged for 12 rounds of what not to do in a super fight of this magnitude. And as the dust settled shows how a one armed healthy man out pointed a roided up Floyd. That's the amazing part lol

[travestyny]

Oh, TravestyNY is back in the fray.. Not that I'm expecting a good show from you this time..I highly doubt it, but let's see. You've never time stamped anything bud, but I did time stamp your nuts haha!

Oh, that pic doesn't really show the whole seen. Can't tell if that was a punch. Time stamp the sequence. Video below.



Here's the video of round 2. Now time stamp what you think will make a strong point about floyd winning that round.

I'm just here.

You time stamped my nuts..?????

I'm not back in any fray. I'm simply asking you to look at that picture, or the video if you would like. The time is showing.

This is what you asked for, right? Will you answer the question? Is that a scoring blow?

[Spoon23]

You time stamped my nuts..?????

I'm not back in any fray. I'm simply asking you to look at that picture, or the video if you would like. The time is showing.

This is what you asked for, right? Will you answer the question? Is that a scoring blow?

Dude, I just told you to time stamp round 2 of this thread video that I've provided so I can get a clear picture of the punch you are trying to make a point about in your pic so I can correlate it with the video, since I have addressed it here in this thread, how I truly support the authors work. Now time stamp it and show me the fight sequence you were referring so I can address your point.

Your picture isn't showing a clear picture of the punch, You need to show the fight sequence and what the author of the video said.

Oh my.. You are back to being red again? What happened? You were already green. I was happy for you. Such tragedy.. You've been in here since 2008 and nothing to show for.. so sad for you..

[travestyny]

Dude, I just told you to time stamp round 2 of this thread video that I've provided so I can get a clear picture of the punch you are trying to make a point about in your pic so I can correlate it with the video, since I have addressed it here in this thread, how I truly support the authors work. Now time stamp it and show me the fight sequence you were referring so I can address your point.

Your picture isn't showing a clear picture of the punch, You need to show the fight sequence and what the author of the video said.

Oh my.. You are back to being red again? What happened? You were already green. I was happy for you.

So... you want me to show you where to find this sequence in a different video?

It's in the video that you posted at the time it says. Are you arguing that some of your slow motion videos are more accurate than others?

[Spoon23]

So... you want me to show you where to find this sequence in a different video?

It's in the video that you posted at the time it says. Are you arguing that some of your slow motion videos are more accurate than others?

?? duh..

This is my thread showing my proof to the boxing public. It's up to you to debunk my videos if you can, that's how it works.

As I've said, I support the video evidences the author of the video has provided. Now either you can debunk it or not. Simple really.

# time stamp and debunk my video if you can

[travestyny]

?? duh..

This is my thread showing my proof to the boxing public. It's up to you to debunk my videos if you can, that's how it works.

As I've said, I support the video evidences the author of the video has provided. Now either you can debunk it or not. Simple really.

# time stamp and debunk my video if you can

You provided a different video. If this thread is only about one particular series of videos, ok...no problem.

The sequence is at the 9:11 mark. The author says it is a decent shot and scores it. It clearly does not land in a scoring area.

Want to share your assessment now?

[Spoon23]

You provided a different video. If this thread is only about one particular series of videos, ok...no problem.

The sequence is at the 9:11 mark. The author says it is a decent shot and scores it. It clearly does not land in a scoring area.

Want to share your assessment now?

Huh?

This is the round 2 video found in the front page of my thread bud. So make sure you time stamp it properly before I give you my take.

[travestyny]

Huh?

This is the round 2 video found in the front page of my thread bud. So make sure you time stamp it properly before I give you my take.

What are you talking about? I'm giving you the exact time in the video you are referring to.

It's at the 9:11 mark.