Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Dosumpthin]

Are you his Travestyny mini or something!!!!

DEFLECTOR DEUX!!!



.

Do you know the definition of "threshold"?

Could it be you are using "threshold type" in place of.....accuracy or efficiency when describing a test?


Maybe that's why the judge said "it's not a threshold" and then said "we only need to reasonably know".


You would make a terrible Lawyer by the way. Using a previous case in which they found the defendant guilty. Lol.


Crazy pact@rd.

[Dosumpthin]

Ahhhhhh. The sweet smell of rigor mortis can only mean one thing.....

Another hole to dig in the pact@rd gravey@rd.




Call this place the GRAVET@RD.

[ADP02]

Do you know the definition of "threshold"?

Could it be you are using "threshold type" in place of.....accuracy or efficiency when describing a test?


Maybe that's why the judge said "it's not a threshold" and then said "we only need to reasonably know".


You would make a terrible Lawyer by the way. Using a previous case in which they found the defendant guilty. Lol.


Crazy pact@rd.

Actually I know it very well.

You may call this BS but as part of my job, I occasionally need to verify thresholds .... For one test, it is even a variable threshold where the user can adjust the threshold. Imagine that? It's not absolute yet it is still called a threshold!!!!

In our requirements, we are calling it now a threshold but even when it was not called that, it was implied!!!!

I had to verify thresholds last week. There were several thresholds to verify on the same item. That is, there were several criteria to test. If one was a threshold type test and others are not, that single test is still called a threshold test.



Do you agree or not?

It appears that you do not but YOU do not explain yourself.

You never do!



.




.

[travestyny]

Look homie, you won, fact. Nothing to prove... We judges spoke like a year plus 4 months ago...
Correct me if I'm wrong....??

Better yet, call me out on something, u a man like me, gots facts to back up everything... We won't see eye to eye on everything... If hate you if you were a sycophant, you'd hate me Paul f I were a bish axx hoe..

I know it's fun ****ing with tarded ppl. I'm guilty of that. Hopefully, GOD, will have mercy on me,

I'm glad we never battled or have to battle. We will let the truth speak for itself.. That's good nuff for me...

Hey, don't blame me. I told the dude over and over to drop it, but he keeps going because he is obsessed with his loss. He kept going so I offered him a rematch, and he declined. So I told him to stop writing to me.

Then he claimed he wanted to accept a rematch. I said fine. Then he tries to make up some new, vague challenge so we can write 90 pages about it...I asked him if it was about the rematch, and he said no and declined again.

As far as I'm concerned it's over. He knows he lost and proved it by continuously declining the rematch. Everyone knows the information I have is crystal clear, even him, which is why he keeps refusing the rematch but now wants to deflect to something else for 90 pages of arguing. There's nothing left to say.

[travestyny]

Zaroku we have been recently arguing about a CAS statement made ..... and whether EPO and other non-threshold substances can have threshold tests.

Travestyny is saying no, I am saying yes.

travestyny said stop talking and lets bet.


So I requested that we bet on this topic ....

BUT

It appears that Travestyny is no longer confident in what he said.

When you define the topic so that Travestyny cannot weasel his way into saying anything (ie. Going off in a tangent), he is not so confident anymore.

That is something that I knew but you guys never realized. It's OK ....



.

I cannot be the one declining since I started the thread on the topic that we have been recently arguing.

AGAIN, I made the request.

So it is up to you to either accept the challenge or decline it.


.

You're a lying sack of shlt. You kept crying and crying for weeks. I offered you a rematch over and over, you kept declining. Finally you made up some vague topic about "Epo or other substances can have threshold criteria" bullshlt. Do you think I didn't see your new deflection coming, idiot. The fact that you now want to DEFLECT to something vague yet you declined yet again the rematch shows CLEARLY that you know you lost. You know it will take less than 2 posts for me to murder you again, so you tucked tail and ran away again.

Your obsession with your loss has been going on for over a year. YOU EVEN BACKED AWAY FROM YOUR INITIAL STATEMENT SAYING "OH, THAT WAS BILLEAU. THAT WASN'T FROM ME" and saying "I REALIZED THAT STATEMENT WASN'T IMPORTANT AFTER I READ YOUR STATEMENT."

You fuvvcked up, dummy. MY STATEMENT CAME AFTER YOURS, YOU MORON. AND YOU APPROVED OF THE STATEMENT FROM BILLEAU. YOU EVEN ASKED TO HAVE IT REVISED AND HE REVISED IT, AND YOU EXPLICITLY AGREED WITH IT. Now all of a sudden you want to distance yourself from it.


Guess what that means. YOU LOST. AND YOU KNOW YOU LOST. Face reality. YOU KNOW I'D TAKE LESS THAN 2 POSTS TO MUDER YOU AGAIN AND THAT'S WHY YOU REFUSED TO STEP UP. If you have anything worth enough to help you win this battle, obviously you'd have accepted the rematch and that would be it. The fact that you refuse the rematch and want to focus on this deflection tells me clearly that it is nothing but a deflection.

It's over, son. Talk about having no confidence. YOU HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN YOUR ENTIRE STANCE. You're just trying to deflect to some other bullshlt because you're desperate, and you're upset that I'm too smart to see through your bullshlt. Give the fvvck up!

[Vadrigar.]

Watch and weep.

Floyd objectively lost.

[Zaroku]

Hey, don't blame me. I told the dude over and over to drop it, but he keeps going because he is obsessed with his loss. He kept going so I offered him a rematch, and he declined. So I told him to stop writing to me.

Then he claimed he wanted to accept a rematch. I said fine. Then he tries to make up some new, vague challenge so we can write 90 pages about it...I asked him if it was about the rematch, and he said no and declined again.

As far as I'm concerned it's over. He knows he lost and proved it by continuously declining the rematch. Everyone knows the information I have is crystal clear, even him, which is why he keeps refusing the rematch but now wants to deflect to something else for 90 pages of arguing. There's nothing left to say.

Aight... Keep big Divk slapping these fools and tools...
I made the mistake thinking the knew, and it is "they" vagisil included...

Oy vey, bro, you, me, jhonny, can't or couldn't ever make this stuff up....I wouldn't even know where to begin...

[Zaroku]

Watch and weep.

Floyd objectively lost.

Carry on my pretty lil Boi Toy Pinoy... Kisses...

[Zaroku]

That's the truth.

But ADP02 STILL hasn't paid up on the bet and given travestyny his points. Can you believe that?

I actually can believe it, and am sadden d by it....

Winning is easy...
Accepting defeat, for some reason, is impossible for some people...

Floyd, beat and defeated manny. I'd **** Floyd up, I'm no lil dude, but p4p.. Floyd(Ployd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me. That mo ****er can sling em...

I see him, slip punches, fade dudes better than a barber shop, my old *** uncles , 85' and 87' say, that big mouth Floyd can fight, better than good...

Better than good..

P4p I wouldn't ever .... I outsize and strength him...

I'm glad Floyd ain't my size...he'd humiliate me in seconds... Never seen nothing like him. My uncle said...

[ADP02]

You're a lying sack of shlt. You kept crying and crying for weeks. I offered you a rematch over and over, you kept declining. Finally you made up some vague topic about "Epo or other substances can have threshold criteria" bullshlt. Do you think I didn't see your new deflection coming, idiot. The fact that you now want to DEFLECT to something vague yet you declined yet again the rematch shows CLEARLY that you know you lost. You know it will take less than 2 posts for me to murder you again, so you tucked tail and ran away again.

Your obsession with your loss has been going on for over a year. YOU EVEN BACKED AWAY FROM YOUR INITIAL STATEMENT SAYING "OH, THAT WAS BILLEAU. THAT WASN'T FROM ME" and saying "I REALIZED THAT STATEMENT WASN'T IMPORTANT AFTER I READ YOUR STATEMENT."

You fuvvcked up, dummy. MY STATEMENT CAME AFTER YOURS, YOU MORON. AND YOU APPROVED OF THE STATEMENT FROM BILLEAU. YOU EVEN ASKED TO HAVE IT REVISED AND HE REVISED IT, AND YOU EXPLICITLY AGREED WITH IT. Now all of a sudden you want to distance yourself from it.


Guess what that means. YOU LOST. AND YOU KNOW YOU LOST. Face reality. YOU KNOW I'D TAKE LESS THAN 2 POSTS TO MUDER YOU AGAIN AND THAT'S WHY YOU REFUSED TO STEP UP. If you have anything worth enough to help you win this battle, obviously you'd have accepted the rematch and that would be it. The fact that you refuse the rematch and want to focus on this deflection tells me clearly that it is nothing but a deflection.

It's over, son. Talk about having no confidence. YOU HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN YOUR ENTIRE STANCE. You're just trying to deflect to some other bullshlt because you're desperate, and you're upset that I'm too smart to see through your bullshlt. Give the fvvck up!

DEFLECTO STRIKES AGAIN!!!


What have we been arguing over the last month?

Your statements in which YOU cannot admit that YOU ARE WRONG!


Here below you are stating it but have done so over and over for a month now!

Why you scared then, ADP. I’m giving you a chance to not go down as a 4-0 loser.

You’ll go down as a 8-0 loser instead

Still running scared? Yea, that’s what I thought. Now shut up and keep ducking the challenge. You know you’ll get bodied in 1 page. Go cry about your loss to someone who cares.


EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?

Court of Arbitration for Sport!
Quote:
The criterion for EPO is not a measurement over the threshold that must occur

The fact is that the BAP and the other interpretative criteria are used to declare not a threshold of human body production but rather an image from the electropherogram as indicating the presence of non-human EPO.

there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
You think the court just brought up threshold substances out of the blue, you complete moron???? They were explaining it to the athlete just like I have explained it to your dumb ass.

BECAUSE YOU DID THINK EPO WAS A THRESHOLD SUBSTANCE, DIDN'T YOU. THAT SHOWS YOUR CONFUSION. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT SAY THAT THE LIST OF THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES WAS A PARTIAL LIST BECAUSE EPO WASN'T ON IT??????

Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list.

WHAT DID YOU MEAN BY THAT, HUH ADP???? LMAOOOOO



On top of that, why are you saying there is a threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance?????

Here is your statement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ADP02
The threshold test result indicates that there is synthetic EPO if it exceeds the threshold. If less, the indication is that there is only human EPO.

exceeds = goes above, right? Good.

Here is the court's statement.
Quote:
there is no threshold above which it can be said there is non-human production of the substance
non-human production of the substance = synthetic EPO, right?

So what we have is:

Your statement:
Quote:
There is a threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

The Court's Statement:
Quote:
There is no threshold above which it can be said there is synthetic EPO.

You actually said what I stated

EPO testing can have thresholds? Can you read?


The bet is on the above statements. You are saying that EPO and other threshold substances cannot have threshold type tests and I say that they can.


What happened?
You ARE NO LONGER CONFIDENT!!!

YOU ARE SCARED to lose!!!



.