Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[Spoon23]

So even when I've responded and spoken to you respectfully, this is what you revert back to.

Nice. Good on ya.

By the way, I got you to admit that there is a clear error in this video. I have no desire to point them all out. But here is something for you to ponder....

if this guy gets it wrong...using SLOW MOTION and having the ability to look over the video an infinite amount of times before making his own commentary on it....

then how the **** do you think these videos are any good?

Thanks. Happy I could accept your challenge and expose your dumb videos. I'll imagine that the butthurt pacroaches will want to give me more red based on this...and that's fine. The pinoy lounge circle jerk boys can give me red all they want. Just means I'm breaking your hearts.

You asked for it. You got what you wanted. I do salute you for admitting that your videos are flawed. LMAO. Thanks!

lol okay..

Here I'll help you out. So we can document everything in here for the world to see.

Do you honestly think Pac has no argument for winning round 2? Simple straight up question.

[travestyny]

lol okay..

Here I'll help you out. So we can document everything in here for the world to see.

Do you honestly think Pac has no argument for winning round 2? Simple straight up question.

I haven't looked over round 2 and I have no desire to. I believe Lederman believed he won round 2. If someone wants to give Pac round 2, good for them.

If you want to give Pacquiao every single round...good for you. But don't sit here and pretend that everyone and everything is biased against Pac and there was a huge conspiracy where 99% of the world was duped by biased commentators from both networks. That's just ridiculous. Fact of the matter is of those in the boxing world, I can only think of 2 people that gave Pac this fight. One is Holyfield, and one seems to be Nacho. And do you know why? It's because Pacquiao legitimately lost. Get over it already.

[Spoon23]

I haven't looked over round 2

lololololol

You see..

You come in here guns blazing, and obviously you did give your self an effort to take a screen shot of the punch in round 2 that you thought didn't land, and you have the nerve to say with a straight face that you didn't look at the round we are arguing about, and you have the nerve to give an opinion of a round that you don't even understand to this day, since you haven't looked over it yet? lmao

You see how you flip flop with false narratives to fit your agenda, but when get trapped in a corner, you cave in and denounce that you actually have no idea what you were talking about in the first place lol

Dude, I'll teach you something important, before going to war be prepared, don't argue in something you have no basis to argue about.

- to make it clear, I just caught you arguing about something you didn't really have inept knowledge off in the first place. It just shows that you have a preconceived notion of what you want to believe happened that night, like how the Judges in this fight did too hahahaha! Or you are one big fuvkn' liar who would lie to your teeth and say whatever will help you with your weak lame arguments. Problem is I caught it haha Bravo dude lol

# Dude ponder on why you are red since 2008. Stop arguing. You have no credibility. It's been 8 years and you have nothing to show for..

[travestyny]

lololololol

You see..

You come in here guns blazing, and obviously you did give your self an effort to take a screen shot of the punch in round 2 that you thought didn't land, and you have the nerve to say with a straight face you didn't look at the round we are arguing about and you give an opinion of a round you don't even understand to this day, since you haven't looked over it yet? lmao

You see how you flip flop with false narratives to fit your agenda, but when get trapped in a corner, you cave in and denounce that you have no idea what you are talking about in the first place lol

Dude, I'll teach you something important, before going to war be prepared, don't argue in something you have no basis to argue about.

- to make it clear, I just caught you arguing about something you didn't really have inept knowledge off in the first place. It just shows you have a preconceived notion of what you want to believe like the Judges in this fight hahahaha! Bravo dude lol

Wrong. I already told you. You posted a video saying it proves something. It was not the video that you have on the first page.

So, since you posted it, I watched it. I only watched about 1 minute and a half of it before I noticed errors.

In that time, there were 2 punches credited to Pacquaio. One was inconclusive whether it landed. The second was the one I took a picture of.

I stopped watching the video at that point, because it was clearly a shlt video. You then asked me to find it in one of your original videos, so I did. Lo and behold, the author of the video also credited this shot, and seemed to hail it...and you admit that it didn't land.

Was there anything else that was necessary? I showed that the videos...all of them...are shlt. Period. You can try to twist that into some kind of instructions that I was supposed to do this and that, and review this entire round or that entire round...sorry, I wasn't informed.

From what I remember, you kept saying over and over that if anyone has a problem with your videos, time-stamp and prove. I did that. Now you are crying that I somehow did this the wrong way....?

[Spoon23]

Wrong. I already told you. You posted a video saying it proves something. It was not the video that you have on the first page.

So, since you posted it, I watched it. I only watched about 1 minute and a half of it before I noticed errors.

In that time, there were 2 punches credited to Pacquaio. One was inconclusive whether it landed. The second was the one I took a picture of.

I stopped watching the video at that point, because it was clearly a shlt video. You then asked me to find it in one of your original videos, so I did. Lo and behold, the author of the video also credited this shot, and seemed to hail it...and you admit that it didn't land.

Was there anything else that was necessary? I showed that the videos...all of them...are shlt. Period. You can try to twist that into some kind of instructions that I was supposed to do this and that, and review this entire round or that entire round...sorry, I wasn't informed.

From what I remember, you kept saying over and over that if anyone has a problem with your videos, time-stamp and prove. I did that. Now you are crying that I somehow did this the wrong way....?

Wrong..

Game over chump.

Time to go home. You fuvked up big time.

You have no idea what your talking about. Man up and accept your fate. You can't even answer a simple question. Shows how lame you are.

I've said enough to waste my time on you. You'll just go on a loop of despair again lol

Bye bye!



# Dude ponder on why you are red since 2008. Stop arguing. You have no credibility. It's been 8 years and you have nothing to show for..

# learn to make sense first lol

[travestyny]

Wrong..

Game over chump.

Time to go home. You fuvked up big time.

You have no idea what your talking about. Man up and accept your fate. You can't even answer a simple question. Shows how lame you are.

I've said enough to waste my time on you. You'll just go on a loop of despair again lol

Bye bye!



# Dude ponder on why you are red since 2008. Stop arguing. You have no credibility. It's been 8 years and you have nothing to show for..

# learn to make sense first lol

LMAO. Someone is upset. I answered your question. You asked if I thought Pac has a claim to round 2. To be clear. Sure. He has a claim to it. Lederman gave it to him, and he is a boxing judge, so why not.

Did I score the round for him. No, I didn't. Maybe you did. Ok. Good for you.

What this thread is about, and what I've shown, is that your videos are shlt. If this guy can't see in slow motion that the punch I showed you didn't land....LMAO.

This is the guy that you've been hailing. Not to mention how biased he is and how much he hates Mayweather, but he is also obviously blind...either physically or by hate.

Oh well...carry on.

[Spoon23]

LMAO. Someone is upset. I answered your question. You asked if I thought Pac has a claim to round 2. To be clear. Sure. He has a claim to it. Lederman gave it to him, and he is a boxing judge, so why not.

Did I score the round for him. No, I didn't. Maybe you did. Ok. Good for you.

What this thread is about, and what I've shown, is that your videos are shlt. If this guy can't see in slow motion that the punch I showed you didn't land....LMAO.

This is the guy that you've been hailing. Not to mention how biased he is and how much he hates Mayweather, but he is also obviously blind...either physically or by hate.

Oh well...carry on.

Sure,whatever makes you happy dude hahaha

Your position is clear and well documented for the world to see..

Carry on chump.

[travestyny]

Sure,whatever makes you happy dude hahaha

Your position is clear and well documented for the world to see..

Carry on chump.

yea...it is documented for the world to see.


Just like it's documented for the world to see that you admit there are flaws in your videos.

Took you over a year, but I'm happy you came around . This is the first step in your recovery. You should be thanking me

[Spoon23]

yea...it is documented for the world to see.


Just like it's documented for the world to see that you admit there are flaws in your videos.

Like I said, you can say what you want, but like froid roid you've been exposed again lmao

Flaws? is plural lol You only saw one and you thought you won the loterry lmao

See how you make fake claims over and over. That's you in a nut shell. No credibility, no basis, no logic and common sense to help you learn to argue with the big boys. Arguing over a topic you are clueless is the dumbest thing you can ever do in a forum.

Carry on buddy boy.

Here's a reminder were you fuvked up hahaha!

I haven't looked over round 2

# You've been RED since 2008. You can't get any lamer than that lol

[travestyny]

Like I said, you can say what you want, but like froid roid you've been exposed again lmao

Flaws? is plural lol You only saw one and you thought you won the loterry lmao

See how you make fake claims over and over. That's you in a nut shell. No credibility, no basis, no logic and common sense to help you learn to argue with the big boys. Arguing over a topic you are clueless is the dumbest thing you can ever do in a forum.

Carry on buddy boy.

Here's a reminder were you fuvked up hahaha!




# You've been RED since 2008. You can't get any lamer than that lol

Coming from a man who can't spell "grazing."

And a man who has been telling people about the same videos over and over, and took him damn near 2 years to find out that they were flawed.

ERRORS. Meaning there are more than one. Since I showed one to you, maybe you should go find the rest. Then come back and tell us what you've learned.

I'm red....but your ****** ass videos were exposed. I feel quite proud of making you look like a moron yet again.

Maybe now, you'll stop saying "time-stamp it." When someone finally did, you were left stuck on ******.