Pac/Floyd investigation, documented punches (disputed rounds) blow by blow

[travestyny]

isn't that what weshould be looking for?

the only thing we should be looking.

that's the final score card, and it says red corner won.

Are you able to read, or what? Do you see where it says Mayweather on the left hand side over where there is an "R" for the red corner, and Pacquaio on the right hand side, where there is a "B" for blue corner?

Furthermore, did you read the final score card, where it says "Mayweather wins by unanimous decision"?

Yea, conveniently pretend that you didn't just read any of that.

[travestyny]

And Who cares about what you think lol

# 39000 viewed and still going to the right viewers

# fl0mos crying in here shows how much butt hurt you guys are in.

# enjoy the truth

Still landing

And how many minds did you change, or is everyone just peering at the train wreck that you've become?

[Spoon23]

And how many minds did you change, or is everyone just peering at the train wreck that you've become?

I'll keep it short.

How many times have you come up here and spout nonsense drivel?

# the fact this thread is on fire shows it's getting to the write people

# I don't expect fl0mos like you to change your minds buddy. Floyd's divk is way way up your ass. Trust me.

# you can't dispute the truth

That's all she wrote.

Bye bye!

[Rath]

Are you able to read, or what? Do you see where it says Mayweather on the left hand side over where there is an "R" for the red corner, and Pacquaio on the right hand side, where there is a "B" for blue corner?

Furthermore, did you read the final score card, where it says "Mayweather wins by unanimous decision"?

Yea, conveniently pretend that you didn't just read any of that.

that Floyd over the R corner does not correspond to a mistake were Floyd is on the red corner.

it was on the slot where it says who is fighting that night, not who was in what corner.

Floyd vs Pac is what it says, Floyd being billed first that is why his name was there over the R corner.

you got it? or you are too smart you did not notice?

who tallied the final score card?

it was not the judges.

if it was the judges then why is it only moretti who remarks Floyd win unanimous decision and not the other two judges and how come all three of them wrote red corner won?

if it was done by another man then that man is the one who wrote Floyd won unanimously and not moretti.

now are you getting the picture? or still not.

conveniently pretend i did not read any of that you say

[travestyny]

that Floyd over the R corner does not correspond to a mistake were Floyd is on the red corner.

it was on the slot where it says who is fighting that night, not who was in what corner.

Floyd vs Pac is what it says, Floyd being billed first that is why his name was there over the R corner.

you got it? or you are too smart you did not notice?

who tallied the final score card?

it was not the judges.

if it was the judges then why is it only moretti who remarks Floyd win unanimous decision and not the other two judges and how come all three of them wrote red corner won?

if it was done by another man then that man is the one who wrote Floyd won unanimously and not moretti.

now are you getting the picture? or still not.

conveniently pretend i did not read any of that you say

Again...so what you are saying is that the judges all thought Pacquaio won, but didn't speak up when the fight was awarded to Mayweather... right?

Right?

lol. Come on, when will you answer this question?

[Real King Kong]

[Rath]

Again...so what you are saying is that the judges all thought Pacquaio won, but didn't speak up when the fight was awarded to Mayweather... right?

Right?

lol. Come on, when will you answer this question?

look at the form.

it was not the original copy it was a photocopy of a cheaply mimeographed printed form.

does it even have NSAC logo on it?

at this day and age NSAC is using mimeograph printed forms?

can't buy a decent colored printer to make the forms?

who provided that form to the media?

was the photocopied form the one that is provided to the media and each one of them took photos of it and run them in their site,

or that photocopied forms photo was provided to the media and everybody run that single photo provided?

[travestyny]

look at the form.

it was not the original copy it was a photocopy of a cheaply mimeographed printed form.

does it even have NSAC logo on it?

at this day and age NSAC is using mimeograph printed forms?

can't buy a decent colored printer to make the forms?

who provided that form to the media?

was the photocopied form the one that is provided to the media and each one of them took photos of it and run them in their site,

or that photocopied forms photo was provided to the media and everybody run that single photo provided?

So instead of answering my question, now you are questioning the entire form? Doesn't that throw out your whole conspiracy theory?

You make this too easy.

[Rath]

So instead of answering my question, now you are questioning the entire form? Doesn't that throw out your whole conspiracy theory?

You make this too easy.

you did not acknowledge a single point i made.

you presented the form not me.

my reply was based on the form you presented.

where is your reply based from?

this is consedierthis vs rath all over again.

did you know what happens with that discussion?

considerthis quits.

too easy you say

[travestyny]

you did not acknowledge a single point i made.

you presented the form not me.

my reply was based on the form you presented.

where is your reply based from?

You are the one with the conspiracy theory about the corners. Would you like to find the form and post it? Please do.