David Haye Greatest Hits

[Chrismart]

What's classic about that comment?

It's certainly not as classic as you saying Sam Peter is a better heavyweight than Joe Frazier.

[- Ram Raid -]

There should be a mental age restriction on this site. Or maybe keep NSB open as a day care centre to separate the adults from those who enjoy playing with their own faeces.

Maybe then someone could post a video and talk about the relative merits of a boxer without having to listen to the emotional tirades of prissy little children.

One can only hope.

[M Bison]

There should be a mental age restriction on this site. Or maybe keep NSB open as a day care centre to separate the adults from those who enjoy playing with their own faeces.

Maybe then someone could post a video and talk about the relative merits of a boxer without having to listen to the emotional tirades of prissy little children.

One can only hope.

Yeah indeed there should be, so stopping the mentally butt hurt little children like you LacedUp and the other Nostalgiatards who have a mental fit when someone doesn't meet your biased agenda to years of the past.

OMG he doesn't like Muhammad Ali, omg he doesn't have the same opinion as me

Yep totally agreed we could do without the immature little kids who can't accept others that have a different view to theirs.

[LacedUp]

Yeah indeed there should be, so stopping the mentally butt hurt little children like you LacedUp and the other Nostalgiatards who have a mental fit when someone doesn't meet your biased agenda to years of the past.

OMG he doesn't like Muhammad Ali, omg he doesn't have the same opinion as me

Yep totally agreed we could do without the immature little kids who can't accept others that have a different view to theirs.

Dude your 'views' are based on nothing though.

You have proved multiple times you don't know a thing about boxing, so why do you think your opinion should be taken seriously?

[M Bison]

Dude your 'views' are based on nothing though.

You have proved multiple times you don't know a thing about boxing, so why do you think your opinion should be taken seriously?

See what I mean there you go again, I've said things that could be took into consideration but your sheer bias overrules it.

Its either your way or the highway, how do you expect others to have a rational debate with you when all you do is poke fun of a subjective matter?
Nothing in these fantasy fights are written in stone and its been proven many of a times that resume (he who fought bigger names) doesn't necessarily mean he beats the guy who doesn't have those marquee names.

Its not like I'm saying a featherweight beats a heavyweight.

[LacedUp]

See what I mean there you go again, I've said things that could be took into consideration but your sheer bias overrules it.

Its either your way or the highway, how do you expect others to have a rational debate with you when all you do is poke fun of a subjective matter?
Nothing in these fantasy fights are written in stone and its been proven many of a times that resume (he who fought bigger names) doesn't necessarily mean he beats the guy who doesn't have those marquee names.

Its not like I'm saying a featherweight beats a heavyweight.

I am definitely open to a debate of whether Frazier would beat Klitschko - I think that's the debate you are referring to.

Arguments can be made for both. And if you would care to debate that in a civil matter, I would gladly do the same.

Now, I am referring to our Frazier vs Peter discussion in which your arguments were absolutely childish and so far-fetched that it was clear you were not discussing whether Frazier was better than Peter, but merely trying to big up one of the few slightly above low-average wins Wlad has on his resume.

And that was ridiculous.

[Suckmedry]

See what I mean there you go again, I've said things that could be took into consideration but your sheer bias overrules it.

Its either your way or the highway, how do you expect others to have a rational debate with you when all you do is poke fun of a subjective matter?
Nothing in these fantasy fights are written in stone and its been proven many of a times that resume (he who fought bigger names) doesn't necessarily mean he beats the guy who doesn't have those marquee names.

Its not like I'm saying a featherweight beats a heavyweight.

You proved you know literally fck all about boxing when you said Peter "annihilates" Frazier. No, not because of any nostalgia bs or anything like that, but because of the simple fact we are talking about two different levels of fighter. Putting aside resume etc (because you can't grasp the concept of different levels of competition) let's go by a simple eye test. Watch Frazier fight, and watch Sam peter fight. Frazier has solid technique, good conditioning, good work rate, good head and foot movement to close distance and of course a devastating left hook that is thrown with great velocity and is also accurate and pretty fast too.

Sam peter is a big strong man, he can punch, he's pretty tough, and as far as top level attributes goes that's about all he has. The guy knows how to fight of course, but his technique is very raw and wild for a top fighter, his defence is abysmal, and I can't be bothered going on/there's no reason to keep disrespecting the man, he's done nothing wrong by me lol.

If you knew boxing you would see that, but hey, you don't, so please do everyone a favour and fck off with your bs to the Klitschko fanboy forums or some ****

[BennyST]

Haye is a good win for Wladimir, I never questioned this. It's the Haye fan boys we are mocking here, who keep backing a fraudster who did not have 1 excellent opponent at HW besides Wlad. And Wlad made Haye look embarrassing, in spite of Haye's credentials and unquestionable danger to Wlad. Haye ended up looking like just another average guy who ran scared, which in return once again displayed Wladimir's true GREATNESS. This is how you need to look at things.

So, he's an excellent win, and Wlads greatest ever opponent, and he doesn't have a single good opponent or win at heavyweight, by your own admission?

Again, when Wlad fanboys say this stuff themselves, it's a bad look.

[Weltschmerz]

So, he's an excellent win, and Wlads greatest ever opponent, and he doesn't have a single good opponent or win at heavyweight, by your own admission?

Again, when Wlad fanboys say this stuff themselves, it's a bad look.

Keep grasping at straws.

[BennyST]

Keep grasping at straws.

Huh? At least reply with something that makes sense.