Buster & Evan Never Held Ring Title

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QueensburyRules
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2018
    • 21799
    • 2,348
    • 17
    • 187,708

    #1

    Buster & Evan Never Held Ring Title

    - -1989 shows the Ring title vacant even though Tyson was still undefeated.

    First guy after Tyson to win the Ring belt was Lewis circa 2001-3 and then Vitali.

    Bit dyslexic, si?

    Who would hold the honorary History forum Belt during those years in the wilderness had there been such a beast?
  • SaturdaysRadio
    Amateur
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 22
    • 1
    • 0
    • 7,002

    #2
    Ring stopped recognizing world champions when the magazine was sold to Stanley Weston's company in late 1989. That's why all the titles are listed as vacant. Tyson was definitely the champ.

    Comment

    • Ben Bolt
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 1294
      • 271
      • 80
      • 21,496

      #3
      Originally posted by SaturdaysRadio
      Ring stopped recognizing world champions when the magazine was sold to Stanley Weston's company in late 1989. That's why all the titles are listed as vacant. Tyson was definitely the champ.
      I believe Weston brought his ideas of rankings from his former magazines, World Boxing/International Boxing/Big Book of Boxing, which later emerged into the K.O. magazine.
      Those mags never listed a specific champion, just ranked fighters from 1 to 10.

      A blow to The Ring tradition, that there could only be one world champ in each weight class.

      Though, Weston's mags were good reading.

      Comment

      • QueensburyRules
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2018
        • 21799
        • 2,348
        • 17
        • 187,708

        #4
        Originally posted by Ben Bolt
        I believe Weston brought his ideas of rankings from his former magazines, World Boxing/International Boxing/Big Book of Boxing, which later emerged into the K.O. magazine.
        Those mags never listed a specific champion, just ranked fighters from 1 to 10.

        A blow to The Ring tradition, that there could only be one world champ in each weight class.

        Though, Weston's mags were good reading.
        - -Guess it took Oscar to fully restore it. Prob a tax write off on his books as with their staff and operational expenses, they can't have made him any money.

        Our library system stopped stocking the mag over a decade ago and I never seen it on a magazine rack since forever now.

        Comment

        • SaturdaysRadio
          Amateur
          Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
          • Mar 2015
          • 22
          • 1
          • 0
          • 7,002

          #5
          Originally posted by Ben Bolt
          I believe Weston brought his ideas of rankings from his former magazines, World Boxing/International Boxing/Big Book of Boxing, which later emerged into the K.O. magazine.
          Those mags never listed a specific champion, just ranked fighters from 1 to 10.

          A blow to The Ring tradition, that there could only be one world champ in each weight class.

          Though, Weston's mags were good reading.
          Yep, Weston bringing his ratings system over from his other mags was the reason. He, or his writers, saw the futility of trying to keep track of organizational champions in 1977 when they switched to that system. I'm sure he had no idea of how bad it would become, though.

          Comment

          • QueensburyRules
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2018
            • 21799
            • 2,348
            • 17
            • 187,708

            #6
            - -Any of you boys put stock in Transnational I believe the rating system is called?

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP