whos more exciting PRIME ali or PRIME tyson

[Yogi]

Lol, I was being sarcastic.

Ah, so was I, as I didn't think it was even possible that I could be the same side as you on anything boxing related...First time for everything, I guess.

[Verstyle]

u guys can thank me later*dusting off hands* yep yep http://www.neweraphoto.com/Don%20King%20Factsheet.htm

[GunStar]

Ah, so was I, as I didn't think it was even possible that I could be the same side as you on anything boxing related...First time for everything, I guess.

Lol, I think it's the second time.

[butterfly1964]

jus admit it they OWNED u when they pulled out that calculator. u didnt see that 1 coming did ya

mystyal, that calculator cannot calculate boxing gate draw inflation. 350,000 dollars in 1927 was a whole lot of money. so much that the highest paid baseball player at that time, babe ruth only made 70,000 ! but according to the calculator, 350,000 in 1927 is only 3.6 million today, when it should be like 40 or 50mil, since the highest paid ball player a-rod makes 25.5 mil. so the curve on that calculator is not high enough. it is flawed when it comes to boxing paydays.

[butterfly1964]

Tyson has 6 fights in the top 10 PPV buys yet boxing was much bigger in the 60s and 70s than the lame years of the 80s and 90s. Feel the sting of this defeat.

uhmmm, did they have pay-per-view when ali was boxing?

[Verstyle]

this 1 is better. the same 1 better quality http://www.donking.com/king.php

[Tony Blitz]

uhmmm, did they have pay-per-view when ali was boxing?

No but Ali would haven't had as many near buys as Tyson did.

[Verstyle]

look at the gate attendance money for tyson and look at some for ali. there sa huuuuuuuuuuuge difference there

[butterfly1964]

No but Ali would haven't had as many near buys as Tyson did.

also the population of the world was greater in the 90s than in the 60s!

[Verstyle]

also the population of the world was greater in the 90s than in the 60s!

more excuses then a doctor