I forget if this has been done before, but this guy was the epitome of cool, calm, collected, and genius. I know we have anecdotes about other fighters throughout history, but Locche seems to be the one guy that I always go back to when I try to look for something to work on. Willie Pep was a diamond in his own right, but I guess he didn't look as good controlling his opponents with his feet like Locche did. Skills wise he is one of the best I've seen, maybe I sound crazy, but I just don't get why we don't celebrate this guy more.
How underrated is Nicolino Locche?
Collapse
-
-
-
Ahem....
I have discussed nicolino with my trainer. We both think he's incredible.
Very little punching power.
Defensively just sublime.
Not "flashy" so much as Whitaker or Mayweather, for example. More a solid defense a lot of the time. Looks like he can take a punch
Chain smoker (apparently).
Not the fittest of boxers. Didn't need to be. He was one of the most relaxed boxers in the ring you'll ever see.
The most intersting thing about him I think is that he incorporates a shoulder roll thing a lot of the time but always seems to press forward into the other guy, off a defensive stance. Always holds his ground.
Thanks for starting this thread. My answer to your question is he's so underrated that usually people haven't heard of him. But IMHO he is the best defensively and he's got a very strange style indeed.
Modern day equivalent would have to be Toney, I guess.
I understand he had trouble fighting outside of Argentina, which is why he isn't that well known? Or something like that...Last edited by Locche; 09-17-2013, 12:27 AM.Comment
-
I forget if this has been done before, but this guy was the epitome of cool, calm, collected, and genius. I know we have anecdotes about other fighters throughout history, but Locche seems to be the one guy that I always go back to when I try to look for something to work on. Willie Pep was a diamond in his own right, but I guess he didn't look as good controlling his opponents with his feet like Locche did. Skills wise he is one of the best I've seen, maybe I sound crazy, but I just don't get why we don't celebrate this guy more.Comment
-
^^^ I think Pep was probably more the athlete.
Locche had a more kind of "solid" style than Pep, sometimes he just stands there and seemingly takes it, although he is actually nullifying the work.
The great thing about Locche in a way is that he did have gaping flaws, not the highest fitness, no punch power, yet he overcame these with his relaxation in the ring. In my opinion one of the most unorthodox and interesting fighters.
But Pep though - who can argue with that? No one.Comment
-
What I think he was a master at was mind games, you watch him doing that stuff and it really looks like his strategy was always to first get inside the other guys head and then sorta manipulate the other guy like he is a puppet. I reckon the best nickname I could come up for Locche is, "The PUPPETMASTER". Yeah I know he wasn't the first to try getting the mental edge but he sure did it in a novel way. as for a comment earlier that he was better defensively than Pep, i do have doubts about that but only because Pep was so clever, to have gone so long without getting caught with a knockout shot he simply must have been amazing. That certainly is not meant as any slight to Locche.Comment
-
I'm not sure Locche was better than Pep defensively, but I don't think he was worse either. Perhaps they stand side by side as the two best defensive fighters of all time?
I think to say that one of them was better kind of unfairly detracts from the other one, if you see what I mean. It's a bit like saying who was the bigger genius out of Einstein and Newton.Comment
-
I'm not sure Locche was better than Pep defensively, but I don't think he was worse either. Perhaps they stand side by side as the two best defensive fighters of all time?
I think to say that one of them was better kind of unfairly detracts from the other one, if you see what I mean. It's a bit like saying who was the bigger genius out of Einstein and Newton.Comment
Comment