Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

whos style is more entertaining to watch tyson or ali.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Thank you for reading my entire post. I would like to point out that many qualified critics, certainly more qualified than we are, agree that both Frazier and Ali were just a pinch beyond their best when they met for the first time. Frazier just had more longevity in his career. Joe Frazier looked really good in some of his later fights when compared to Ali (except vs. Foreman). In fact, most boxing analysts say that Ali had the most disappointing twilight fights they ever paid money to see. It was basically a travelling circus to get Ali to fight all over the world. Nonetheless, his career outlasted Tyson's by a mile.

    The excitement Tyson brought to the sport was enormous. None before or after drew crowds as large, or as many viewers. There was an equal impact when Tyson started to crumble in 1989. A huge chunk of fans left for things like Nascar (*shudders*) when Tyson wasn't fighting with heart anymore. His decline wouldn't have been as saddening had he not brought so much excitement to begin with. With Ali, people were just wondering when he (Ali) was going to realize what everybody else was asking: when is he finally going to hang up the gloves? Ali's career slowly built up in volume and faded out drearily. Tyson's exploded onto the scene and had the rug pulled out from under it in a heartbeat.

    Muhammad Ali's career was like an ice cream cone: At first, it's smooth, picturesque, and could lure in even the hardest of hearts. Every now and then in drips on you, but it sure tastes sweet. Once you start reaching the end, the crunchy part isn't as good as the ice cream itself, but you might as well eat it anyway.

    Mike Tyson's career was like an ****** without the build-up: It hits hard, it hits fast, it gets a person fired up....and then it leaves, and no one wants *** anymore.
    Last edited by Brassangel; 12-27-2005, 03:36 PM.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Brassangel
      By the way, are you 17-18 years old? That hardly makes you the "check-in" guy when it comes to Ali. Anybody who has fought like Ali since his time, or anybody who has tried his style out who visits this forum doesn't have to answer to you to make sure that they got it right.
      what, are you intimidated because a 17yr. old knows more about ali than anyone here? haha, i got people shaking in their boots cause i'm more ali knowledgeable than them and i'm still a minor! Pwned! sometimes i amaze even myself sometimes lol!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Brassangel
        Thank you for reading my entire post. I would like to point out that many qualified critics, certainly more qualified than we are, agree that both Frazier and Ali were just a pinch beyond their best when they met for the first time. Frazier just had more longevity in his career. Joe Frazier looked really good in some of his later fights when compared to Ali (except vs. Foreman). In fact, most boxing analysts say that Ali had the most disappointing twilight fights they ever paid money to see. It was basically a travelling circus to get Ali to fight all over the world. Nonetheless, his career outlasted Tyson's by a mile.

        The excitement Tyson brought to the sport was enormous. None before or after drew crowds as large, or as many viewers. There was an equal impact when Tyson started to crumble in 1989. A huge chunk of fans left for things like Nascar (*shudders*) when Tyson wasn't fighting with heart anymore. His decline wouldn't have been as saddening had he not brought so much excitement to begin with. With Ali, people were just wondering when he (Ali) was going to realize what everybody else was asking: when is he finally going to hang up the gloves? Ali's career slowly built up in volume and faded out drearily. Tyson's exploded onto the scene and had the rug pulled out from under it in a heartbeat.

        Muhammad Ali's career was like an ice cream cone: At first, it's smooth, picturesque, and could lure in even the hardest of hearts. Every now and then in drips on you, but it sure tastes sweet. Once you start reaching the end, the crunchy part isn't as good as the ice cream itself, but you might as well eat it anyway.

        Mike Tyson's career was like an ****** without the build-up: It hits hard, it hits fast, it gets a person fired up....and then it leaves, and no one wants *** anymore.
        funny post, but true.

        Comment


        • #64
          I think so, and I'll thank you for suggestion as such.

          I do have one more analogy, a little less comical:

          Muhammad Ali's career was like a Monet; beautiful, if even poetic, while a little sloppy at times. They got worse as time wore on, but people will always pay to see impressionistic work.

          Mike Tyson's career was like a Bob Ross; while it looks good on paper, it only takes 20 minutes to finish.

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP