Does anybody believe that Jack Johnson....

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kid McCoy
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 1029
    • 86
    • 155
    • 7,583

    #11
    Yes, he was guilty. Johnson regularly consorted with **********s, traveled across state lines with **********s, pimped them out of his Chicago restaurant, loaned one the money to set up her own whorehouse and married at least one of them. He was exactly the kind of person the Mann Act was targeting.

    Comment

    • T.Horton
      master chief = ****
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 15412
      • 1,374
      • 2,610
      • 28,331

      #12
      Originally posted by Kid McCoy
      Yes, he was guilty. Johnson regularly consorted with **********s, traveled across state lines with **********s, pimped them out of his Chicago restaurant, loaned one the money to set up her own whorehouse and married at least one of them. He was exactly the kind of person the Mann Act was targeting.
      ^^^ none of this stuff was actually illegal though, aside from the pimping. and there is no proof that he was a pimp in all that i have read.

      Comment

      • Canelo Phresh
        LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2010
        • 13714
        • 829
        • 1,353
        • 23,724

        #13
        Originally posted by Timothy Horton
        ^^^ none of this stuff was actually illegal though, aside from the pimping. and there is no proof that he was a pimp in all that i have read.
        watched unforgivable blackness on netflix they never said hewas a pimp but he ran ran establishments that had prostitution.

        Comment

        • Kid McCoy
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2008
          • 1029
          • 86
          • 155
          • 7,583

          #14
          Originally posted by Timothy Horton
          ^^^ none of this stuff was actually illegal though, aside from the pimping. and there is no proof that he was a pimp in all that i have read.
          Johnson's restaurant in Chicago doubled up as a whorehouse. What with that and all his other behaviour, he was a pimp by most definitions. If there's a law designed to stop the interstate trafficking of women for immoral purposes and you have a man who's traveling around the country with **********s, and also owns and operates a whorehouse, then he's guilty of violating the Mann Act. You can argue about whether such a law was justified in the first place, but by the letter of that law, he was guilty.

          Comment

          • T.Horton
            master chief = ****
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 15412
            • 1,374
            • 2,610
            • 28,331

            #15
            Originally posted by Kid McCoy
            Johnson's restaurant in Chicago doubled up as a whorehouse. If there's a law designed to stop the interstate trafficking of women for immoral purposes and you have a man who's traveling around the country with **********s, and also owns and operates a whorehouse, then he's guilty of violating the Mann Act. You can argue about whether such a law was justified in the first place, but by the letter of that law, he was guilty.
            The Champion's cafe was not a whorehouse. Not from my understanding anyway....

            Comment

            • Canelo Phresh
              LUCAS KO'S FLOYD
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2010
              • 13714
              • 829
              • 1,353
              • 23,724

              #16
              Originally posted by Kid McCoy
              Johnson's restaurant in Chicago doubled up as a whorehouse. What with that and all his other behaviour, he was a pimp by most definitions. If there's a law designed to stop the interstate trafficking of women for immoral purposes and you have a man who's traveling around the country with **********s, and also owns and operates a whorehouse, then he's guilty of violating the Mann Act. You can argue about whether such a law was justified in the first place, but by the letter of that law, he was guilty.
              i think that they just want the loud mouth black champ gone

              Comment

              • T.Horton
                master chief = ****
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 15412
                • 1,374
                • 2,610
                • 28,331

                #17
                Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
                watched unforgivable blackness on netflix they never said hewas a pimp but he ran ran establishments that had prostitution.
                I thought it was more that he allowed **********s in - it's not really Johnson's fault if hookers are plying their trade. I kind of think Johnson cared just about the money that these types of women would generate. I do not believe that these women were paying him to use the establishment for prostitution - if they were Johnson would have been a pimp.

                If you get the chance read Randy Roberts book as well. Papa Jack.

                Comment

                • T.Horton
                  master chief = ****
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 15412
                  • 1,374
                  • 2,610
                  • 28,331

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Kid McCoy
                  Johnson's restaurant in Chicago doubled up as a whorehouse. What with that and all his other behaviour, he was a pimp by most definitions. If there's a law designed to stop the interstate trafficking of women for immoral purposes and you have a man who's traveling around the country with **********s, and also owns and operates a whorehouse, then he's guilty of violating the Mann Act. You can argue about whether such a law was justified in the first place, but by the letter of that law, he was guilty.
                  and from all of the accounts i have seen or read, we was not profiting directly from prostitution (as the Act states that you have to) and thus could not have been a pimp. The Roberts' book went into The Mann Act pretty extensively.

                  Comment

                  • Kid McCoy
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 1029
                    • 86
                    • 155
                    • 7,583

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Timothy Horton
                    The Champion's cafe was not a whorehouse. Not from my understanding anyway....
                    It was. The second floor was a whorehouse. If he was running **********s out of his own establishment, I don't really see how he wasn't profiting from it. And you didn't have to profit financially in order to be violate the act, it just concerns the transportation of women for "immoral purposes". The first two men charged under the act had done nothing more than take their girlfriends away for a holiday.

                    Originally posted by Mannie Phresh
                    i think that they just want the loud mouth black champ gone
                    I'm sure they did, but Johnson's behaviour made it a lot easier for them.

                    Comment

                    • T.Horton
                      master chief = ****
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 15412
                      • 1,374
                      • 2,610
                      • 28,331

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Kid McCoy
                      It was. The second floor was a whorehouse. If he was running **********s out of his own establishment, I don't really see how he wasn't profiting from it. And you didn't have to profit financially in order to be violate the act, it just concerns the transportation of women for "immoral purposes". The first two men charged under the act had done nothing more than take their girlfriends away for a holiday.



                      I'm sure they did, but Johnson's behaviour made it a lot easier for them.
                      am going to try and find some quotes - the original reason was to stop interstate trafficking of **********s, namely those brought into the country, just traveling with hookers isn't the same.

                      Johnson having a motel upstairs is not the same as being a pimp or madam.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP