No, it was because Ali, aka Cassius, was not as good as the self-hype would have you believe. He was certainly beatable. Little Henry Cooper dropped him and if it wasnt for Angelo Dundee's ripping of Ali's glove, Ali very well could have lost that fight.
Ali was the self-proclaimed "Greatest" and later on her would more than prove this, but it is wrong to say he was so beatable, as many do, during the 60s.
He did many things wrong, and against the right type of fighter he would have been beaten. Luckily for him, the 60s didnt produce the greatest quality of fighters.
And I scored it closer, I honestly feel it could have gone either way. Ali has been the beneficiary of numerous "decisions".
I love Ali, and he is the greatest, but he is given a pass by way too many. He had serious flaws in his game. he was just so athletically superior he could overcome them.
Ali was the self-proclaimed "Greatest" and later on her would more than prove this, but it is wrong to say he was so beatable, as many do, during the 60s.
He did many things wrong, and against the right type of fighter he would have been beaten. Luckily for him, the 60s didnt produce the greatest quality of fighters.
And I scored it closer, I honestly feel it could have gone either way. Ali has been the beneficiary of numerous "decisions".
I love Ali, and he is the greatest, but he is given a pass by way too many. He had serious flaws in his game. he was just so athletically superior he could overcome them.
Comment