"Jack "Doc" KEARNS Writes ; "LES DARCY Was The Greatest Middleweight To Ever Live".
From Chapter 7 : SILVER DOLLAR AND CHEWING GUM MAKES SCALES DO ***** THINGS :- By Jack "Doc" KEARNS;- It is my opinion that LES DARCY was the greatest Middleweight to ever live. I will be taken to task over this statement, especially by friends of Bob FITZSIMMONS and Stanley KETCHEL, to say nothing of the admirers of Tommy RYAN, but I am sincere in saying that the unfortunate Darcy was the peer of them all. HE HAD WHAT THE BEST OF THEM HAD,... AND THEN SOME. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe that a fight between Darcy and Ketchel would have been the best that the ring ever saw.----- A good hitter and a consistent one, against a "now and then" socker. You know Ketchel was a "now and then" fellow, a miss, a jab, and then he'd let one go to collect the money. With Darcy it was all consistency, he was on top of his man continually. He was very much on the order of Jack DEMPSEY, only faster, in every respect. His aggressiveness would have made him whip the best that ever lived in his class. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- I had plenty of time to study this fellow. Billy MURRAY, whom I brought to Australia from San Francisco, went 20 rounds with him. Darcy was way off that day and he proved it by coming back a little later and knocking out Murray in 6 rounds. In quick order I matched Murray against Jimmy CLABBY, Eddie McGOORTY, Tom GIBBONS, Knockout BROWN and Jack DILLON, so you see I was sure I had something better than an ordinary fighter in Murray. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the first Darcy fight, Murray kept saying to me ; "This isn't a mug, Jack. He's got everything, I can't lay a glove on him, and I've tried everything I know". ---------------------------------------------- MODESTY ITSELF. --------------------------------------------- The longer it went the less chance Murray had to lay one on Darcy. He made a monkey out of poor Billy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Murray wasn't the only victim, Darcy whipped every Middleweight we ever sent to Australia, and we sent some real good ones over there. He was only a boy, but he was a real champion. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- He was a blacksmith, between fights, you'd see Les Darcy working at his trade. He wasn't too proud to go back to the forge, He whipped Mick KING for the Middleweight title in that country and the next day he was back at work, leather apron and all. Great crowds gathered to see the wonder boy of the land, but he paid little attention to the ovations that they heaped upon him. He was modesty itself. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Boxing had taken on a new lease of life in that part of the world. Sam Langford had just left when we got there, and of course Jack JOHNSON's victory over Tommy BURNS for the Heavyweight Title had turned the eyes of the whole world on Australia. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hugh McIntosh had helped boom the sport and he was among those who had founded the great boxing stadiums at Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne. He had a wonderful crowd,.. I mean the fans. I don't suppose there is a race of people on earth who are more devoted to the sport than the Australians.
Do you think Kearns is wrong ???......... This Article was published in the Rochester Evening Journal on 19 JULY 1926. I will not attempt to debate any fighters after this date, this thread is about gloved boxing, MW's only up to Mid-1926..... Man there's a hell of a lot of great MW's among those but Kearns totally thinks Darcy was the best of all-time up to that date. What are your thoughts, how do you rate Jack Kearns's knowledge and right to make this claim,............. IS LES DARCY THE GREATEST UP TO 1926 ????..... Or where should he rate ????.. the link to the article it is just part of Kearn's book http://www.google.com/url?url=http:/...QFnkNk1QQ8F0XA
Comment