Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

First Legal Bare-Knuckle Fight in Over a Century

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • First Legal Bare-Knuckle Fight in Over a Century

    I thought this might be of interest to lovers of boxing lore and history:

    Reviving a bygone, bare-knuckle era

    By Michael Woods
    Special to ESPN.com


    Bobby Gunn arrived in Arizona on Thursday, a day before he was set to take part in what is believed to be the first sanctioned bare-knuckle boxing match since 1889, when John L. Sullivan had his hand raised after foe Jake Kilrain's corner threw in the towel -- following 75 rounds of hand-to-hand combat.

    The 37-year-old hitter, who goes by the nickname "The Celtic Warrior" when he gloves up under the Marquess of Queensberry rules, wasn't much worried that he would be thrown off by the gloveless fists of opponent Richard Stewart. Nor was he fretting that he might sustain an injury more severe than, say, the regulation busted nose that he had accumulated while amassing a 21-4-1 mark since turning pro in 1989. In fact, Gunn said he felt at ease because he had been fighting in events like this one since he was 13 years old.

    "I grew up in this," Gunn told ESPN.com. "It's nothing new to me. It's such an honor to be in the footsteps of John L. Sullivan. And nobody will be arrested afterwards."

    Presumably, Gunn is right. Promoter David Feldman, along with partner Len Hayko, will stage the show at the Fort McDowell Casino, a 40-square-mile reservation just outside Scottsdale, Ariz. The bare-knuckle match, along with some boxing and MMA fights that will round out the card, will be overseen by the Yavapai Nation, not the Arizona State Boxing Commission.

    Feldman assured ESPN.com several times that all proper precautions would be taken to ensure that the fighters aren't hurt, and he insisted that Gunn and Stewart are less likely to be seriously hurt in a bare-knuckle fight than in a "regular" boxing match because, in a bare-knuckle tussle, a fighter is less likely to take a sustained beating.

    "Safety is first," said Feldman, a former pro boxer who has tried for years to get the bare-knuckle event rolling but has been met with resistance from folks who cried barbarism. "With the gloves, people absorb more blows. But we're not going to let anyone get killed or let someone's eye fall out."

    The promoter is trying to toe a line here, as he also believes that fight fans are looking for more in-your-face action -- more violence, less science, perhaps.

    "Fans want it a little more extreme," Feldman said, after admitting that his own father, trainer Marty Feldman, told him he wouldn't watch Gunn-Stewart. "They want a little bit more brutality."

    The last time a bare-knuckle boxing match was held in the U.S., the event wasn't widely publicized, as bare-fist fighting was illegal in most of the 38 states. Sullivan was the favorite in the eyes of the majority who came to see "The Boston Strong Boy" take on New York native Kilrain -- although Sullivan's detractors thought his penchant for boozing might give Kilrain an opening. When Sullivan vomited during the 44th round of a bout contested under the London Prize Ring rules, Kilrain's backers liked their man's chances a bit more.

    But the men kept scrapping, tossing blows and throwing each other to the ground. Finally, after two hours and 16 minutes under a scorching sun, at the end of the 75th round, Kilrain's corner threw in the towel.

    Gunn and Stewart will have to get through only 10 rounds or less, with each round lasting 90 seconds. No takedowns are allowed, as they were during the Sullivan era. Two referees will monitor the action, and if someone is badly cut, a cutman will be allowed to immediately work on the slice for 30 seconds. Fight fans can watch online at u******.tv, for a fee.

    Gunn said he has taken part in about 70 underground bare-knuckle fights since his first foray at Niagara Falls, Canada, when as a 13-year-old he took on a 17-year-old.

    "A guy wanted to fight me," Gunn said. "My father spoke to him. It was in a field. We made a ring. I busted him up pretty good."

    He was born to brawl, Gunn says, and simply enjoys everything that comes with the package. No, he hasn't broken through into the big time in the fight game yet, and smart money says it will be hard for him to jump up in class, as he hasn't been able to get over the high hurdle of world-class fighters like Tomasz Adamek and Enzo Maccarinelli when given the chance. But he is hopeful, as is Feldman, that bare-knuckle boxing will take off.

    "I sure hope so, pal," Gunn said. "Listen, fighting to me is like a virus: Once you get it, it's hard to get rid of. And you don't want to get rid of it."

    He doesn't see himself as the John L. Sullivan of the 2000s, he says. "I'm just Bobby Gunn. I couldn't carry John L.'s gym bag."

    But Gunn's humility isn't infinite; he says he has never lost a bare-knuckle fight. The talent he has faced, he says, is top-tier.

    "Some guys were better than top-10 contenders. It was a waste of talent. If they were trained properly… People say we don't have great American heavyweights. They aren't looking in the right place."

    Gunn won't have to look hard to find Stewart, a 35-year-old Delaware resident who has a 14-9-2 mark as a pro boxer. Stewart has lost five in a row fighting under the Queensberry rules, but he didn't sound dejected, like a man merely on a mission to cash a paycheck, on Thursday.

    "My God, I'm so excited," he said. "It's great to be taking part in something they haven't done in more than a hundred years.

    "We'll be getting the linear title of John L. Sullivan. We'll come forward, meet in the center and see who's still standing. Neither of us has ever claimed to be a Roy Jones Jr. type. Whoever is less bloody and still standing will be the winner."

    There will be some who will protest that this is proof positive we're all becoming less civilized, that Feldman's event is a return to the bad old days when there was less oversight of fighters. Stewart answers that men will be men, that we are all animals -- human animals, but animals nevertheless.

    "As much as we've evolved, we're men, it's in our genes," he said. "We want to see who's tougher, just like we did back in the schoolyard. Me and Bobby are the kind of guys who, if they didn't have sanctioned fighting, we'd be fighting in some back alley."

  • #2
    75 rounds, wonder how pascal wouldve done back in the day

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by STILL_DETOX View Post
      75 rounds, wonder how pascal wouldve done back in the day
      It was a totally different game back then. Those were some tough SOBs. We tend to think that the old days were all "Wild, Wild West", but bare-knuckle fighting was illegal virtually everywhere.

      I've had an interest in this stuff since I read "The Manly Art: Bare-knuckle Prize Fighting in America" by Elliott J. Gorn, some years ago. It's a terrific book.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by STILL_DETOX View Post
        75 rounds, wonder how pascal wouldve done back in the day
        A "round" meant something completely different at that time. Fighters could simply take a knee whenever they wanted with no penalty. It's really a completely different sport from the modern form.

        Comment


        • #5
          No gloves = broken hands. I think this will be a dud.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
            No gloves = broken hands. I think this will be a dud.
            London Prize Ring was as much about grappling as punching.

            Comment


            • #7
              the marquis de queensbury invented boxing as we know it


              i've been lead to believe from what i've read that john l's era of "boxing" was wrestling with punches that doesn't go to the ground

              if a man gets dropped and or thrown he has time to get up


              and i'm pretty sure a guy could take 30 seconds if he was dropped
              not a ten count
              but a 30 count!

              can you imagine!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by New England View Post
                the marquis de queensbury invented boxing as we know it


                i've been lead to believe from what i've read that john l's era of "boxing" was wrestling with punches that doesn't go to the ground

                if a man gets dropped and or thrown he has time to get up


                and i'm pretty sure a guy could take 30 seconds if he was dropped
                not a ten count
                but a 30 count!

                can you imagine!
                Knockdown or knee = end of round. Hence the 100+ rounds, you can rest whenever you feel like for up to 30 seconds with no scoring penalty, and you can neither take nor throw many shots without breaking your hands, so they have to be gauged expertly.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Shiranui View Post
                  Knockdown or knee = end of round. Hence the 100+ rounds, you can rest whenever you feel like for up to 30 seconds with no scoring penalty, and you can neither take nor throw many shots without breaking your hands, so they have to be gauged expertly.
                  Their Fists were hardened through constant fighting and over time their hands could withstand a lot. Hands could still break of course and did, But these were men who could withstand a lot more than most people today could only dream of, they rarely ever quit even when busted up in the extreme. There are reports of 2 to 3 hour fights where both men would have half the skin off their faces, but there were many worse things that could happen, poverty was a far worse option. The tactic of going down without being hurt was not one with much crowd support, but was certainly something that William "Bendigo" Thompson used a lot , especially against Ben Caunt, he was obviously a good actor, he usually got away with it. LPRR was a different type of fight in many ways, to the 20th Century version, but many of the basics were there. Thankfully though, tactics like wrapping the ropes around the opponents neck, and then throttling and bashing the immobilised mans nose flat,......... has been disallowed,.....I bet that tactic was effective but.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by McGoorty View Post
                    Their Fists were hardened through constant fighting and over time their hands could withstand a lot. Hands could still break of course and did, But these were men who could withstand a lot more than most people today could only dream of, they rarely ever quit even when busted up in the extreme. There are reports of 2 to 3 hour fights where both men would have half the skin off their faces, but there were many worse things that could happen, poverty was a far worse option. The tactic of going down without being hurt was not one with much crowd support, but was certainly something that William "Bendigo" Thompson used a lot , especially against Ben Caunt, he was obviously a good actor, he usually got away with it. LPRR was a different type of fight in many ways, to the 20th Century version, but many of the basics were there. Thankfully though, tactics like wrapping the ropes around the opponents neck, and then throttling and bashing the immobilised mans nose flat,......... has been disallowed,.....I bet that tactic was effective but.
                    No doubt about that. Today's boxers haven't as great a need to toughen their fists to the extent the old-timers did. Even the boxers of the early twentieth century had to have tough hands, since the gloves they used had less padding than the ones in use today.

                    There's a book called "Championship Streetfighting: Boxing As A Martial Art" by Ned Beaumont, where the author describes methods of toughening the hands for bare-knuckle fighting. It's a good read. I would guess that many of the posters on Boxingscene would be interested in this book. As the title implies, it's about the superiority of boxing as a fighting art. Beaumont makes arguments that sound much like the "debates" that take place here about boxing versus MMA.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP