Hopkins and Hagler:Grading their wins over smaller opponents

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Toney616
    The Avenger
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 3493
    • 132
    • 294
    • 10,202

    #1

    Hopkins and Hagler:Grading their wins over smaller opponents

    Hagler vs Hearns
    Hagler vs Duran
    Hopkins vs Oscar
    Hopkins vs Tito


    Are these A,B or C level wins? Please explain your reasoning
  • Vadrigar.
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8134
    • 517
    • 415
    • 20,350

    #2
    1. A
    2. A
    3. B
    4. C

    Comment

    • kadyo's
      Grand Son
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2004
      • 23629
      • 2,648
      • 3,802
      • 56,474

      #3
      I would rate it as A or B since we are comparing only two great fighters. I say A for Hagler and B for for bhop mainly because hearns and duran became champs at higher weights. On the other hand oscar regressed while tito, damn what did tito do after the WW? lol

      How are you my man?

      Comment

      • Toney616
        The Avenger
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2010
        • 3493
        • 132
        • 294
        • 10,202

        #4
        Hagler vs Hearns
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        1. A
        This was Hearns first fight at mw, he would go on to beat Roldan, but that was much later
        Hagler vs Duran
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        2. A
        Duran would get a win over Barkley, proving he was competitive at the weight class, but he didnt do enough to be considered elite, at mw
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        3. B
        Oscar wasnt very good at mw, even though his win over Sturm was debatable he did beat a decent mw
        Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
        4. C
        Why so low?

        Comment

        • Toney616
          The Avenger
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2010
          • 3493
          • 132
          • 294
          • 10,202

          #5
          Originally posted by kadyo
          I would rate it as A or B since we are comparing only two great fighters. I say A for Hagler and B for for bhop mainly because hearns and duran became champs at higher weights. On the other hand oscar regressed while tito, damn what did tito do after the WW? lol?
          If I understand you correctly you have:
          1 A
          2 A
          3 B
          4 B
          Do you consider Hearns and Duran to be elite fighters at mw?
          Originally posted by kadyo
          How are you my man?
          I'm ok. Thanks for asking
          How's life treating you?

          Comment

          • Vadrigar.
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • May 2010
            • 8134
            • 517
            • 415
            • 20,350

            #6
            Originally posted by IronMike*
            Hagler vs Hearns

            This was Hearns first fight at mw, he would go on to beat Roldan, but that was much later
            Hagler vs Duran

            Duran would get a win over Barkley, proving he was competitive at the weight class, but he didnt do enough to be considered elite, at mw

            Oscar wasnt very good at mw, even though his win over Sturm was debatable he did beat a decent mw

            Why so low?
            I put it this way. Hagler knocked out so manny middleweights, yet a lightweight Duran took him to a split desicion. That proves Duran is a great fighter.

            Sorry I made a mistake. Titio should be B and oscar a C.

            Comment

            • kadyo's
              Grand Son
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2004
              • 23629
              • 2,648
              • 3,802
              • 56,474

              #7
              Originally posted by IronMike*
              Hagler vs Hearns

              This was Hearns first fight at mw, he would go on to beat Roldan, but that was much later
              Hagler vs Duran

              Duran would get a win over Barkley, proving he was competitive at the weight class, but he didnt do enough to be considered elite, at mw

              Oscar wasnt very good at mw, even though his win over Sturm was debatable he did beat a decent mw

              Why so low?
              Oscars win against sturm was a farce, it was a gift decison for the hopkins fight while hopkins versus tito is a mismatch looking at hindsight. I don't know man, tito won the MW championship via joppy who KO'd duran but joppy looks like a WW. I don't know but that's how I feel.

              Comment

              • Toney616
                The Avenger
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 3493
                • 132
                • 294
                • 10,202

                #8
                Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                I put it this way. Hagler knocked out so many middleweights, yet a lightweight Duran took him to a split desicion. That proves Duran is a great fighter.
                Duran was a great fighter, no doubt, his fight with Barkley is one of my favorite fights
                Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
                Sorry I made a mistake. Titio should be B and oscar a C.
                Doesn't Tito's win over Joppy mean anything to you?

                Comment

                • kadyo's
                  Grand Son
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 23629
                  • 2,648
                  • 3,802
                  • 56,474

                  #9
                  Originally posted by IronMike*
                  If I understand you correctly you have:
                  1 A
                  2 A
                  3 B
                  4 B
                  Do you consider Hearns and Duran to be elite fighters at mw?

                  I'm ok. Thanks for asking
                  How's life treating you?
                  Elite middleweights? no not at all. Hearns is an elite WW and Duran is arguably the p4p #1 LW of all time but I think both won legit WW belts during the time they were considered past their primes. On the other hand oscar didn't really win it against sturm and joppy is a weak MW champ.

                  Life is good my man, can't ask for more.

                  Comment

                  • Toney616
                    The Avenger
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 3493
                    • 132
                    • 294
                    • 10,202

                    #10
                    Originally posted by kadyo
                    Oscars win against sturm was a farce, it was a gift decison for the hopkins fight
                    True. The question is how do we grade gift decisions, do we ignore them or accept them?
                    Originally posted by kadyo
                    while hopkins versus tito is a mismatch looking at hindsight.
                    I watched the fight years after it happened, so I can only comment on it from hindsight. One guy looked like a jmw the other guy like a full blown lhw
                    Originally posted by kadyo
                    I don't know man, tito won the MW championship via joppy who KO'd duran but joppy looks like a WW. I don't know but that's how I feel.
                    I think the Joppy win means he could compete at mw, although it should be pointed out that Joppy was nothing special. His best wins are:
                    Duran (shot)
                    Eastman(journeyman)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP