I would rate it as A or B since we are comparing only two great fighters. I say A for Hagler and B for for bhop mainly because hearns and duran became champs at higher weights. On the other hand oscar regressed while tito, damn what did tito do after the WW? lol
I would rate it as A or B since we are comparing only two great fighters. I say A for Hagler and B for for bhop mainly because hearns and duran became champs at higher weights. On the other hand oscar regressed while tito, damn what did tito do after the WW? lol?
If I understand you correctly you have:
1 A
2 A
3 B
4 B
Do you consider Hearns and Duran to be elite fighters at mw?
Originally posted by kadyo
How are you my man?
I'm ok. Thanks for asking
How's life treating you?
This was Hearns first fight at mw, he would go on to beat Roldan, but that was much later Hagler vs Duran
Duran would get a win over Barkley, proving he was competitive at the weight class, but he didnt do enough to be considered elite, at mw
Oscar wasnt very good at mw, even though his win over Sturm was debatable he did beat a decent mw
Why so low?
I put it this way. Hagler knocked out so manny middleweights, yet a lightweight Duran took him to a split desicion. That proves Duran is a great fighter.
Sorry I made a mistake. Titio should be B and oscar a C.
This was Hearns first fight at mw, he would go on to beat Roldan, but that was much later Hagler vs Duran
Duran would get a win over Barkley, proving he was competitive at the weight class, but he didnt do enough to be considered elite, at mw
Oscar wasnt very good at mw, even though his win over Sturm was debatable he did beat a decent mw
Why so low?
Oscars win against sturm was a farce, it was a gift decison for the hopkins fight while hopkins versus tito is a mismatch looking at hindsight. I don't know man, tito won the MW championship via joppy who KO'd duran but joppy looks like a WW. I don't know but that's how I feel.
I put it this way. Hagler knocked out so many middleweights, yet a lightweight Duran took him to a split desicion. That proves Duran is a great fighter.
Duran was a great fighter, no doubt, his fight with Barkley is one of my favorite fights
Originally posted by -D33Pwaters-
Sorry I made a mistake. Titio should be B and oscar a C.
Doesn't Tito's win over Joppy mean anything to you?
If I understand you correctly you have:
1 A
2 A
3 B
4 B
Do you consider Hearns and Duran to be elite fighters at mw?
I'm ok. Thanks for asking
How's life treating you?
Elite middleweights? no not at all. Hearns is an elite WW and Duran is arguably the p4p #1 LW of all time but I think both won legit WW belts during the time they were considered past their primes. On the other hand oscar didn't really win it against sturm and joppy is a weak MW champ.
Oscars win against sturm was a farce, it was a gift decison for the hopkins fight
True. The question is how do we grade gift decisions, do we ignore them or accept them?
Originally posted by kadyo
while hopkins versus tito is a mismatch looking at hindsight.
I watched the fight years after it happened, so I can only comment on it from hindsight. One guy looked like a jmw the other guy like a full blown lhw
Originally posted by kadyo
I don't know man, tito won the MW championship via joppy who KO'd duran but joppy looks like a WW. I don't know but that's how I feel.
I think the Joppy win means he could compete at mw, although it should be pointed out that Joppy was nothing special. His best wins are:
Duran (shot)
Eastman(journeyman)
Comment