Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ring No1 rated 1950 vs 2000 who wins

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ring No1 rated 1950 vs 2000 who wins

    Heavyweight----- Joe Louis vs Lennox Lewis
    Light-Heavyweight- Archie Moore vs Roy Jones Jr
    Middleweight----- Ray Robinson vs Bernard Hopkins
    Welterweight----- Kid Gavilan vs Shane Mosley
    Lightweight------- Ike Williams vs Jose Luis Castillo
    Featherweight---- Sandy Saddler vs Naseem Hamed
    Bantamweight---- Manuel Ortiz vs Paulie Ayala
    Flyweight--------- Rinty Monaghan vs Eric Morel

  • #2
    Heavyweight----- Joe Louis
    Light-Heavyweight- Archie Moore
    Middleweight----- Bernard Hopkins
    Welterweight----- Kid Gavilan
    Lightweight------- Jose Luis Castillo
    Featherweight---- Sandy Saddler (LoL)
    Bantamweight---- Manuel Ortiz
    Flyweight--------- Rinty Monaghan

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
      Heavyweight----- Joe Louis vs Lennox Lewis
      Light-Heavyweight- Archie Moore vs Roy Jones Jr
      Middleweight----- Ray Robinson vs Bernard Hopkins
      Welterweight----- Kid Gavilan vs Shane Mosley
      Lightweight------- Ike Williams vs Jose Luis Castillo
      Featherweight---- Sandy Saddler vs Naseem Hamed
      Bantamweight---- Manuel Ortiz vs Paulie Ayala
      Flyweight--------- Rinty Monaghan vs Eric Morel
      Joe Louis
      Roy Jones Jr.
      Ray Robinson
      Shane Mosley
      Ike Williams

      Sandy Saddler vs Naseem Hamed. Saddler was phenomenal and I know I will get flack for this but I think Hamed can win this fight...

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
        Joe Louis
        Roy Jones Jr.
        Ray Robinson
        Shane Mosley
        Ike Williams

        Sandy Saddler vs Naseem Hamed. Saddler was phenomenal and I know I will get flack for this but I think Hamed can win this fight...
        What makes you think this?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by RubenSonny View Post
          What makes you think this?
          Saddler was aggressive and put on a lot of pressure and Hamed was very unorthodox with lightning fast reflexes. He is a very frustrating guy to fight as in his prime he was very difficult to land on and he is the hardest hitting featherweight of all time. Naseem Hamed had incredible speed.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
            Saddler was aggressive and put on a lot of pressure and Hamed was very unorthodox with lightning fast reflexes. He is a very frustrating guy to fight as in his prime he was very difficult to land on and he is the hardest hitting featherweight of all time. Naseem Hamed had incredible speed.
            I'd say Saddler may have very well been a harder puncher and proved he could deal with the southpaw stance. Hamed was definately frustrating but he never fought anyone near the level of Saddler, the same cannot be said for Saddler. I respect your opinion but I couldn't take someone like Hamed to beat a legitimate top atg in Saddler.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by RubenSonny View Post
              I'd say Saddler may have very well been a harder puncher and proved he could deal with the southpaw stance. Hamed was definately frustrating but he never fought anyone near the level of Saddler, the same cannot be said for Saddler. I respect your opinion but I couldn't take someone like Hamed to beat a legitimate top atg in Saddler.
              ATG doesn't mean unbeatable.

              And Hamed without question hits harder than Saddler.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
                ATG doesn't mean unbeatable.

                And Hamed without question hits harder than Saddler.
                How do you know? Plus Hamed doesn't have a particular good skillset, what could he do to Saddler if he cant knock him out? IMO hes only got a punchers chance.
                Last edited by RubenSonny; 01-10-2011, 02:28 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
                  Heavyweight----- Joe Louis vs Lennox Lewis
                  Light-Heavyweight- Archie Moore vs Roy Jones Jr
                  Middleweight----- Ray Robinson vs Bernard Hopkins
                  Welterweight----- Kid Gavilan vs Shane Mosley
                  Lightweight------- Ike Williams vs Jose Luis Castillo
                  Featherweight---- Sandy Saddler vs Naseem Hamed
                  Bantamweight---- Manuel Ortiz vs Paulie Ayala
                  Flyweight--------- Rinty Monaghan vs Eric Morel
                  Joe Louis KO8
                  Ray Robinson UD
                  Moore without a doubt get's a KO here.
                  Kid Gavlain Stoppage or Mosley close Decision depending on no of rounds.
                  Pick 'em
                  Saddler TKO
                  Ortiz
                  Last edited by Barn; 01-10-2011, 04:44 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
                    ATG doesn't mean unbeatable.

                    And Hamed without question hits harder than Saddler.
                    I don't see any way you can explain that statement. He had 144 wins and 103 KO's was the first time to stop Wille Pep and has a ATG straight right and left hook.

                    If the Ring's greatest punchers means anything to you (I question it's credibility as there is a few peculier spots) Saddler is #5 and Naseem Hamed is #46 and this was compiled in 2003.

                    http://boxing.about.com/od/history/a/ring_punchers.htm

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP