Did Hopkins beat Calzaghe

[Cassius Liston]

Your opinions please............................

[The_Demon]

No,he simply didnt do enough

The only people that claim hopkins actually won are his nuthuggers

[Toney616]

No. Him winning using those tactics does nothing for Boxing

[EMSLDB]

i had him winning 114-113 i had the 1st rd kd as the difference. He in my opinion landed more clean punches in at least 6rds. Not really a hopkins fan definately not a nuthugger. His fights are to ****ing boring nowadays

[THE REED]

No... he didn't do enough in the later rounds..

[Tuggers1986]

No. Him winning using those tactics does nothing for Boxing

What has that got to do with anything. He either won or he didnt. It doesnt matter if you dont like the way he did it or what it did for boxing

[lfc19titles]

no, calzaghe landed more and dominated the fight, calzaghe won the fight by around 3 points at least

[Toney616]

What has that got to do with anything. He either won or he didnt. It doesnt matter if you dont like the way he did it or what it did for boxing

Everything
Headbutting: Illegal
Holding as a form of strategy:Illegal
Throwing the right hand then leading with the head: Illegal
Hitting on the break: Illegal
Hitting and holding:Illegal
Faking low blows to get rest breaks

The dude should of got "awarded" with a dq loss, not a sd loss

[bojangles1987]

Certainly not convincingly if you do think he won. He has an argument, but come on you can't argue that Calzaghe didn't deserve to win.

[Wild Blue Yonda]

No, he did not. However, he was close enough to convince me the Hopkins of his pomp would've likely been too good for Calzaghe.

As it was, Hopkins fell by the wayside late, & it was crucial. Calzaghe won a close fight.