Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Jack Dempsey over-rated (imo) by a lot of historians and other sources?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Yes, but, do you think #4 Heavyweight would warrant a ranking such as #9 on a P4P list?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Barnburner View Post
      Yes, but, do you think #4 Heavyweight would warrant a ranking such as #9 on a P4P list?
      No, but then again I think Heavyweights in general get overrated in a p4p sense

      Poet

      Comment


      • #13
        Let's say for example someone such as Hagler or Monzon who may regard to be a Top 5 Middleweight if I ranked Hagler at #9 I would get crucified for bias. So I don't understand why it goes passed by for Dempsey.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Barnburner View Post
          Let's say for example someone such as Hagler or Monzon who may regard to be a Top 5 Middleweight if I ranked Hagler at #9 I would get crucified for bias. So I don't understand why it goes passed by for Dempsey.
          Not from me. I don't see Hagler as a top-10 p4p all that particularly controversial. But that's just me :hah9:

          Poet

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
            Not from me. I don't see Hagler as a top-10 p4p all that particularly controversial. But that's just me :hah9:

            Poet
            I remember I had Hagler 25 on a P4P list and got around 5 replies saying he was too high.

            Comment

            Working...
            X
            TOP