very much so,duran fought all those years based on a fabled reputation,he has only one win against a good fighter and that was a controversial close win over leonard in the first fight which left the majority of the fans in disbelief
very much so,duran fought all those years based on a fabled reputation,he has only one win against a good fighter and that was a controversial close win over leonard in the first fight which left the majority of the fans in disbelief
That's it right there proof to me that you do not have a brain in that skull.
very much so,duran fought all those years based on a fabled reputation,he has only one win against a good fighter and that was a controversial close win over leonard in the first fight which left the majority of the fans in disbelief
duran should not have been awarded the decision,leonard out boxed him and landed more punches,in the second fight duran was getting schooled again and quit,duran lost by a overwhelming unanimous decision to benitez,he won 2 maybe 3 rounds in his lopsided loss to hagler,he got pummeled against hearns,lets get the facts straight duran is not the fighter youmake him out to be
duran should not have been awarded the decision,leonard out boxed him and landed more punches,in the second fight duran was getting schooled again and quit,duran lost by a overwhelming unanimous decision to benitez,he won 2 maybe 3 rounds in his lopsided loss to hagler,he got pummeled against hearns,lets get the facts straight duran is not the fighter youmake him out to be
How about you watch some fights, before polluting this part of the board?
Because he thinks duran is overrated? so what? people make out duran is invincible on this forum when he clearly isnt,I also never thought he was as skilled as some say he was
Because he thinks duran is overrated? so what? people make out duran is invincible on this forum when he clearly isnt,I also never thought he was as skilled as some say he was
Yet, you're another troll. So, I have no reason to discuss anything with you.
Comment