Was Larry Holmes's HW Era ''Weak''?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dan Vida
    Banned
    • Sep 2010
    • 97
    • 10
    • 0
    • 177

    #21
    Don't think it was that weak.It was certainly much stronger than this era or Tyson's era.


    Definite top 4 heavy

    Comment

    • Roger Yomama
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2007
      • 1041
      • 96
      • 182
      • 1,644

      #22
      Originally posted by die antwoord
      its much better now because the fighters are much better. Wlad klitschko doesnt duck people like holmes did and he takes on all comers. Guys with much better than the guys holmes faced, who fought guys with much better records.

      Just take chambers and chagaev since they are the last two, two great fighters who would have been beasts against anyone. White tyson and fast eddie in the 80's...holmes would have ducked them, wlad dispatches both with ease.


      I am ROFL'ing like there is no tomorrow

      Comment

      • Scott9945
        Gonna be more su****ious
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2007
        • 22032
        • 741
        • 1,371
        • 30,075

        #23
        The heavyweights of Holmes' era were pretty good. Holmes' opponents, not so much.

        Comment

        • BigStereotype
          #1 Knicks Fan
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 6177
          • 325
          • 792
          • 14,139

          #24
          I don't think it was especially weak, but it was such a huge letdown from the Ali-Foreman-Frazier era and then there was the late 80's through 90's era immediately after.

          Comment

          • BattlingNelson
            Mod a Phukka
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 29839
            • 3,246
            • 3,190
            • 286,536

            #25
            I think it was weak. Nobody but Holmes managed to put a solid win-streak together against proven opponents. The best qualified challenger for Holmes was arguably Cooney and his credentials was made from blowing out fighters well past it (Norton, Lyle).

            Comment

            • CarlosG815
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2010
              • 3683
              • 240
              • 192
              • 10,304

              #26
              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              I think it was weak. Nobody but Holmes managed to put a solid win-streak together against proven opponents. The best qualified challenger for Holmes was arguably Cooney and his credentials was made from blowing out fighters well past it (Norton, Lyle).
              He would also lose 2 straight to Spinks which would never happen to a true ATG heavyweight. Spinks was never a great heavyweight and was made a household name as a HW for his win's over Holmes.

              Comment

              • StarshipTrooper
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 17917
                • 1,180
                • 1,344
                • 26,849

                #27
                Originally posted by CarlosG815
                He would also lose 2 straight to Spinks which would never happen to a true ATG heavyweight. Spinks was never a great heavyweight and was made a household name as a HW for his win's over Holmes.
                I would point out that it also happend to Dempsey: Tunney, like Spinks, was a Light-Heavy who moved up and dethroned a past it Heavyweight Champion. Tunney and Spinks even have roughly the same number of fights at Heavyweight (around 5 give or take) and Spinks' opposition at that weight was actually better.

                Poet

                Comment

                • Greatest1942
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Sep 2010
                  • 872
                  • 33
                  • 4
                  • 7,064

                  #28
                  Originally posted by poet682006
                  I would point out that it also happend to Dempsey: Tunney, like Spinks, was a Light-Heavy who moved up and dethroned a past it Heavyweight Champion. Tunney and Spinks even have roughly the same number of fights at Heavyweight (around 5 give or take) and Spinks' opposition at that weight was actually better.

                  Poet
                  I, agree not much in that but Tunney had a better chin IMO. Coming back to Holmes era one of the big drawbacks against Larry is the experience level of some of his opponents. He fought some very inexperienced fighters. Another big drawback is he never gave rematch to Witherspoon and Weaver. Never fought perennial contenders and talented fighters like Page and Dokes, and against very ordinary heavies had serious trouble. He should have given atleast two rematches. The total win-lose record of his opponents should I say is pretty weak compared to Ali or Louis.

                  Comment

                  • BattlingNelson
                    Mod a Phukka
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 29839
                    • 3,246
                    • 3,190
                    • 286,536

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Greatest1942
                    I, agree not much in that but Tunney had a better chin IMO. Coming back to Holmes era one of the big drawbacks against Larry is the experience level of some of his opponents. He fought some very inexperienced fighters. Another big drawback is he never gave rematch to Witherspoon and Weaver. Never fought perennial contenders and talented fighters like Page and Dokes, and against very ordinary heavies had serious trouble. He should have given atleast two rematches. The total win-lose record of his opponents should I say is pretty weak compared to Ali or Louis.
                    Louis' era is not comparable to Ali's. In fact Louis' era is IMO very weak as well as Holmes era.

                    Comment

                    • Forza
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 6069
                      • 373
                      • 161
                      • 13,461

                      #30
                      I think this has already been said but, NO the division was not weak. It just looked bad compared to the ali-frazier-foreman-norton era.

                      It's such a damn shame holmes is so underrated. Best jab in HW history, maybe in all weight classes. Only person to take a prime shavers right hand to the jaw and still be able to get off the canvas and finish the fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP