Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
View Post
I mean, its hilarious. Max Baer never won a fight that went past 10 rounds against a guy who wasnt named primo or king something. But yep...he had some great stamina, why? Because this guy said so.
Harry Wills...someone said hes an ATG. He's gotta be better than Wlad. Roger Bannister ran the fastest mile in 1958 and is in the Track HOF. So that means he's better than the two guys from my hometown who missed the olympics but ran the mile faster than he ever did. Should everyone who runs a 4 minute mile be in the track hall of fame? Come on, some guy youve never seen, who never fought for a title, was automatically better than Wladimir? Thats just absurdity.
Max Schmelling- Im a fan of his, but come on. Max Schmeling was a LHW. He weighed in the 180's in his prime. But he'd be able to beat someone 70lbs heavier than him and 6 inches taller? Longer reach? More skilled? Harder hitting? Better chin...yes Wlad's chin was better than Schmeling's who got KO'ed early a couple times. Schmeling got KO 1'ed by a guy a named Gypsy. He never even fought a guy over 210 lbs...but he'd beat Wladimir Klitschko? No questions about it. He beat Joe Louis so he'd beat Wladimir Klitschko. Because triangle theory 1. works in boxing and 2. because we all remember the merciless beating Joe Louis gave to Wladimir.
Peter Jackson- Someone's grandpa saw him and they said he was the best they ever saw, and they lived till the 60's and we all know that everyone in the 60's was better than Wladimir Klitschko.
It doesnt matter, since as we all know Abraham Lincoln was the bestboxer of all time. He would beat everyone. No one could beat Honest Abe in the ring.
Comment