Many people claim the 'golden age' peaked in the 70s when boxing had some of its greatest heavyweights of all time in their peak. This was an era dominated mainly by the likes of Muhammad Ali, Joe Fraizer and George Foreman.
My question, is, who was better out of the 3 (taking their whole career into consideration)?
Personally I think they all have their own advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered.
Ali was a great fighter, no doubt, and had an in ring presence that just can't be matched. I just think he was overrated and many of his victorious fights can be debated. Then again he did lose 3 years, arguably what was to be his peak, to the sport for personal beliefs.
Foreman was a hard hitter, that only a few could put a stop to. And his longevity in the sport (at the top) is just overwhelming, that itself brings him up there with the top.
Fraizer was also a skilled fighter. I don't like to say he really lost to Ali, because although the records have it written otherwise, I could easily have him the winner of all 3 encounters. Also, having a bad left eye for the majority of his career would be a factor in favour.
I'll give my verdict after others have replied.
So who is the better out of these 3 all time greats?
Discuss.
My question, is, who was better out of the 3 (taking their whole career into consideration)?
Personally I think they all have their own advantages and disadvantages that need to be considered.
Ali was a great fighter, no doubt, and had an in ring presence that just can't be matched. I just think he was overrated and many of his victorious fights can be debated. Then again he did lose 3 years, arguably what was to be his peak, to the sport for personal beliefs.
Foreman was a hard hitter, that only a few could put a stop to. And his longevity in the sport (at the top) is just overwhelming, that itself brings him up there with the top.
Fraizer was also a skilled fighter. I don't like to say he really lost to Ali, because although the records have it written otherwise, I could easily have him the winner of all 3 encounters. Also, having a bad left eye for the majority of his career would be a factor in favour.
I'll give my verdict after others have replied.
So who is the better out of these 3 all time greats?
Discuss.
Comment