Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Frank Bruno

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Good power but use to get winded to quick and that chin was no help either

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
      One dimensional fighter who had tremendous power but choked in nearly all of his biggest fights-Tyson(2), Witherspoon, Smith and Lewis. Did fight better than his talent suggested he should. A C rated heavyweight
      I've noticed a lot of posters use the term, "C rated heavyweight."

      Bruno was in the top 10 for most of his career, so who would you describe as B rated heavyweights?..
      Surely, this would put Carl Williams, Gerrie Coetzee, James Tillis, Oliver McCall etc, all in the D rated catagory?
      Also, how does a C rated HW get 4 cracks at the HW title, and eventually win it?
      I mean, nobody can say it was a lucky punch!..

      Ok, he was incredibly well managed and I bet he's got 10 times more money in the bank than Tyson and Witherspoon put together, but in my opinion Bruno was way above C rated.. Or am I not quite grasping the concept here?
      Last edited by mickey malone; 03-29-2010, 11:06 PM.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
        I've noticed a lot of posters use the term, "C rated heavyweight."

        Bruno was in the top 10 for most of his career, so who would you describe as B rated heavyweights?..
        Surely, this would put Carl Williams, Gerrie Coetzee, James Tillis, Oliver McCall etc, all in the D rated catagory?
        Also, how does a C rated HW get 4 cracks at the HW title, and eventually win it?

        I mean, nobody can say it was a lucky punch.. Ok, he was incredibly well managed and I bet he's got 10 times more money in the bank than Tyson and Witherspoon put together, but in my opinion Bruno was way above C rated.. Or am I not quite grasping the concept here?
        Here's how I rank:

        A Level - ATGs and Near Greats
        B Level - Top Contenders in an average strength era.
        C Level - Journeymen and Fringe Contenders in an average strength era.
        D Level - Club Fighters
        E Level - Tomato Cans

        Poet

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
          in my opinion Bruno was way above C rated.. Or am I not quite grasping the concept here?
          He was definitely an easy B rated fighter and always a top contender.

          I think he'd take back the C rated comment if he could.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
            I've noticed a lot of posters use the term, "C rated heavyweight."

            Bruno was in the top 10 for most of his career, so who would you describe as B rated heavyweights?..
            Surely, this would put Carl Williams, Gerrie Coetzee, James Tillis, Oliver McCall etc, all in the D rated catagory?
            Also, how does a C rated HW get 4 cracks at the HW title, and eventually win it?

            I mean, nobody can say it was a lucky punch.. Ok, he was incredibly well managed and I bet he's got 10 times more money in the bank than Tyson and Witherspoon put together, but in my opinion Bruno was way above C rated.. Or am I not quite grasping the concept here?
            I would put Coetzee and Williams as C rated fighters also. Tillis and McCall would be D fighters. Bruno was a very popular fighter who lacked that extra intangible to be great. John Ruiz, who i can't stand, is in my opinion also a C rated fighter. If A+ is Ali and Louis, what do other Heavyweights rate? Is Tyson a B+ or an A-? I'd give Holmes and A- as well as Lewis and Johnson, Dempsey and marciano are A's. I believe if you are a B rated fighter, you are borderline HOF(Norton). Bruno had a very good career and yes, he saved money and is doing well. He is not a HOF fighter, though he is a class act and a credit to the sport

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
              I would put Coetzee and Williams as C rated fighters also. Tillis and McCall would be D fighters. Bruno was a very popular fighter who lacked that extra intangible to be great. John Ruiz, who i can't stand, is in my opinion also a C rated fighter. If A+ is Ali and Louis, what do other Heavyweights rate? Is Tyson a B+ or an A-? I'd give Holmes and A- as well as Lewis and Johnson, Dempsey and marciano are A's. I believe if you are a B rated fighter, you are borderline HOF(Norton). Bruno had a very good career and yes, he saved money and is doing well. He is not a HOF fighter, though he is a class act and a credit to the sport
              I would rate Ali, Louis, Holmes, Tyson, Johnson, Dempsey, and Marciano as A Fighters as they are all legitimate ATGs. I would rate Lewis an A Fighter as well as he's a near-great. Norton would be a B Fighter as he was a consistant top-contender in an extremely strong era.

              Poet

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                I would rate Ali, Louis, Holmes, Tyson, Johnson, Dempsey, and Marciano as A Fighters as they are all legitimate ATGs. I would rate Lewis an A Fighter as well as he's a near-great. Norton would be a B Fighter as he was a consistant top-contender in an extremely strong era.

                Poet
                I agree. What about Foreman, Frazier, and Tunney? Are they A's as well? You and malone have me thinking about rating all the Heavyweight champs from A-D. I believe the above three would all be A's. Excellent post by both you and malone.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
                  I agree. What about Foreman, Frazier, and Tunney? Are they A's as well? You and malone have me thinking about rating all the Heavyweight champs from A-D. I believe the above three would all be A's. Excellent post by both you and malone.
                  Absolutely Foreman and Frazier are A Level. Tunney only had five fights at Heavyweight so I don't rate him there: He was an A Level Light-Heavyweight though.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by 1SILVA View Post
                    I agree. What about Foreman, Frazier, and Tunney? Are they A's as well?
                    Hell yes they are.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                      Absolutely Foreman and Frazier are A Level. Tunney only had five fights at Heavyweight so I don't rate him there: He was an A Level Light-Heavyweight though.

                      Poet
                      So you would put Tunney and Spinks as A 175 pound fighters who had brief success at Heavy. fair enough.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP