Dempsey Wills lawsuit

[travestyny]

AND here once again is a quote directly from the ruling:

“During the proceeding in the circuit court of this county it was sought to introduce evidence for the purpose of showing damages, other than nominal damages, and in view of the fact that the CASE HAS TO BE RETRIED, this court is asked to consider the various items of expense claimed to have been incurred and various offers of proof made to establish damages for breach of the agreement.”

In black in white “and in view of the FACT that the CASE HAS TO BE RETRIED”.

The case as far as I can see was never retried.

Retried FOR DAMAGES.

Once again...
Did the court say that as a matter of law Dempsey is responsible for damages?


I'll await your answer.


You are purposely trying to distort what the court found. You keep claiming that Dempsey won because in 1931 the court, though finding that he did indeed breach a valid contract, decided that damages couldn't be definitively proven. The appeals court states plainly that this decision is REVERSED. So even you trying to pin 1931 as the be all end all on a technicality blows up in your face when the court says the decision is REVERSED. The court also blatantly and specifically says judgment should have been for the plaintiff as a matter of law.

The relevant information regarding the courts and this issue are as follows:

1. The courts said there was a valid contract.
2. The courts said Dempsey broke the contract.
3. The courts said Dempsey is responsible for damages.
4. The courts issued an injunction to stop Dempsey from fighting anyone but Wills.

These are all facts that you cannot run from.