Carlos Palomino

[mrboxer]

why my points are clearly made and followed up with a complete analogy of any sensible topic,i fully gather all the information that is posted i study them, and to the best of my knowledge respond in a expertise and polite manner

[GJC]

why my points are clearly made and followed up with a complete analogy of any sensible topic,i fully gather all the information that is posted i study them, and to the best of my knowledge respond in a expertise and polite manner

Well so far, and please correct me if I misquote you, you have said:

1) Joe Frazier isn't a top 100 atg HW or beat anyone in todays top 50?
2) Holmes also isn't a top 100 atg HW and the Norton Holmes fight was boring.
3) Foreman beat Holyfield?
4) Lennox Lewis was a second rate HW?
5) Toney, RJJ, McClellan, Jackson and Kalambay were average?
6) Foreman was beating Ali and got careless?
7) Pac would knock out Duran in 30 seconds of round 1 because Duran hasn't got the skill to handle the barrage of punches?

[Benncollinsaad]

Where did you graduate from mrboxer, Lampley's school of nonsense?

[Steak]

I always really liked Palomino. really sickening body puncher. he was no Leonard or Duran, but he gave Benitez a pretty good fight and beat good fighters while he was champion.

he was a little lacking in head movement, but was pretty good at parrying punches. his body attack was something else, it was just plain nasty.

[TheGreatA]

I always really liked Palomino. really sickening body puncher. he was no Leonard or Duran, but he gave Benitez a pretty good fight and beat good fighters while he was champion.

he was a little lacking in head movement, but was pretty good at parrying punches. his body attack was something else, it was just plain nasty.

Agreed. I think he had solid defense on the inside but he could be hit. The problem was that you couldn't really hurt him.

I wish Palomino and Cuevas had fought each other. That's a dream match that could have happened but didn't.

Palomino had the linear claim but Cuevas took on top opposition more consistently.

[Steak]

Agreed. I think he had solid defense on the inside but he could be hit. The problem was that you couldn't really hurt him.

I wish Palomino and Cuevas had fought each other. That's a dream match that could have happened but didn't.

Palomino had the linear claim but Cuevas took on top opposition more consistently.

agreed. that was the only problem with Palomino, over his title reign the only real notable names he fought were Dave Green, Stracy and Muniz. good wins, but it pales in comparison to how Cuevas ripped through Espada x3, Weston, Ranzany and Gray.

I heard he was avoided, but then Ive heard the same about Cuevas.

[mrboxer]

Well so far, and please correct me if I misquote you, you have said:

1) Joe Frazier isn't a top 100 atg HW or beat anyone in todays top 50?
2) Holmes also isn't a top 100 atg HW and the Norton Holmes fight was boring.
3) Foreman beat Holyfield?
4) Lennox Lewis was a second rate HW?
5) Toney, RJJ, McClellan, Jackson and Kalambay were average?
6) Foreman was beating Ali and got careless?
7) Pac would knock out Duran in 30 seconds of round 1 because Duran hasn't got the skill to handle the barrage of punches?

in my opinion of a non biased manner i stand by these quotes,frazier is a small heavy who would not beat a heavy ranked above the top 50 today,holmes only had a jab the fighters he beat none were either nobodies or fighters that hung on to long,foreman clobbered holyfield and it was a close fight that should of went to foreman his punches were harder and on target,lewis he was big and slow and his glass jaw made him an easy target of kayos by no ones,number 5 they are all regular joes,number six foreman had ali out but tired himself out,and duran really never beat anyone good,he beat leonard on what was a rip off leonard clearly threw more shots on target,and quit in the rematch,hearns hit duran with that thunderous right duran went down like a tree,duran would not be able to handle constant pressure thus allowing pac to give him a thumping,this is just a short analysis of these quotes

[GJC]

in my opinion of a non biased manner i stand by these quotes,frazier is a small heavy who would not beat a heavy ranked above the top 50 today,holmes only had a jab the fighters he beat none were either nobodies or fighters that hung on to long,foreman clobbered holyfield and it was a close fight that should of went to foreman his punches were harder and on target,lewis he was big and slow and his glass jaw made him an easy target of kayos by no ones,number 5 they are all regular joes,number six foreman had ali out but tired himself out,and duran really never beat anyone good,he beat leonard on what was a rip off leonard clearly threw more shots on target,and quit in the rematch,hearns hit duran with that thunderous right duran went down like a tree,duran would not be able to handle constant pressure thus allowing pac to give him a thumping,this is just a short analysis of these quotes

Don't think I need to add anything LOL

[mrboxer]

i am glad you learned something,and feel free to use this knowledge that you have just gained from this post,i like it when i can be of help.like i said i get mail on a daily basis from members like yourself and guest asking me for boxing opinions

[GJC]

i am glad you learned something,and feel free to use this knowledge that you have just gained from this post,i like it when i can be of help.like i said i get mail on a daily basis from members like yourself and guest asking me for boxing opinions

You have got to be a wind up 