Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Poll: Frank Bruno.. Massive Puncher.. Yes or No?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Poll: Frank Bruno.. Massive Puncher.. Yes or No?

    *****'s inspired this.. I know what I think...
    18
    YES
    66.67%
    12
    NO
    33.33%
    6

    The poll is expired.


  • #2
    Definitely in the Top 3 of hardest punchers of all time.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Demise View Post
      Definitely in the Top 3 of hardest punchers of all time.
      The Ring don't even have him in their top 100 punchers of all time!!!!
      Hence the main reason for this thread... It's a diabolical liberty!

      Comment


      • #4
        Shavers said that Bruno had the hardest punch after him.

        Comment


        • #5
          # Bruno has 38 knockout wins from 40 victories; which is a 95% knockout record and gives Bruno one of the highest knockout percentages in heavyweight boxing history.
          # Frank Bruno's straight punch was 6320 newtons and the punch took only 0.1 seconds from start to finish.
          Anybody good with physics?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
            The Ring don't even have him in their top 100 punchers of all time!!!!
            Hence the main reason for this thread... It's a diabolical liberty!
            Okay, the ring list was for the 100 GREATEST punchers not the 100 HARDEST punchers: Power, while an important component, is only one of the factors considered in creating the list. This is why Earnie Shavers didn't top the list. While I agree Bruno is one of the hardest punchers ever (and I've caught ****e before for saying it), I don't think he was one of the greatest punchers. A good example is I remember reading where a common opponent said Bruno was a harder puncher than Tyson; but I don't think anyone would descibe Frank as a BETTER puncher than Tyson. Think of it like a comparison between Shavers and Foreman: Shavers a slightly harder puncher than Foreman; Foreman a better overall puncher than Shavers.

            Poet

            Comment


            • #7
              What poet said. Except the power in Bruno's punch I still don't consider top 50 material p4p.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                Okay, the ring list was for the 100 GREATEST punchers not the 100 HARDEST punchers: Power, while an important component, is only one of the factors considered in creating the list. This is why Earnie Shavers didn't top the list. While I agree Bruno is one of the hardest punchers ever (and I've caught ****e before for saying it), I don't think he was one of the greatest punchers. A good example is I remember reading where a common opponent said Bruno was a harder puncher than Tyson; but I don't think anyone would descibe Frank as a BETTER puncher than Tyson. Think of it like a comparison between Shavers and Foreman: Shavers a slightly harder puncher than Foreman; Foreman a better overall puncher than Shavers.

                Poet
                But do they have an AT Hardest punchers list?... My main point is, that they have massive limitations in recognizing overseas fighters.. In my opinion, they either put em away, or they don't.. Bruno's the reason why no one's ever KO'd McCall..
                Great or Hard, not to make the top 100 is criminal in Bruno's case..

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
                  But do they have an AT Hardest punchers list?...
                  Not that I've seen but then my Ring Magazine collection only really covers the 1990s.

                  Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
                  My main point is, that they have massive limitations in recognizing overseas fighters.. In my opinion, they either put em away, or they don't.. Bruno's the reason why no one's ever KO'd McCall...Great or Hard, not to make the top 100 is criminal in Bruno's case..
                  Maybe in the case of Heavyweights. In the lighter weight classes overseas fighters have traditionally gotten plenty of coverage from Ring. An example: Late '80s early '90s Benn, Eubank, Collins, and Graham rightly got plenty of coverage in Ring as the cream of the Middleweight division. Part of the problem with Bruno is that he was regarded as a joke (wrongly) in the US.....as were all UK Heavyweights. That perception of the "horizontal" British Heavyweight took a long time to dissipate and Lennox Lewis was tainted by that perception for a looooong time: At least up until he brutalized Grant and Tyson. That changed some people's minds about him. Up until then he was regarded as just another joke UK Heavyweight fraud. Unfortunately not ALL minds were changed by Lewis' execution of Grant and Tyson and you'll still find posters making him out to be a joke.....as they still do Bruno.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yeah, I guess so. A very hard puncher. He has to be up there.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP