*****'s inspired this.. I know what I think...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Poll: Frank Bruno.. Massive Puncher.. Yes or No?
Collapse
-
Poll: Frank Bruno.. Massive Puncher.. Yes or No?
18YES66.67%12NO33.33%6The poll is expired.
Tags: None
-
-
# Bruno has 38 knockout wins from 40 victories; which is a 95% knockout record and gives Bruno one of the highest knockout percentages in heavyweight boxing history.
# Frank Bruno's straight punch was 6320 newtons and the punch took only 0.1 seconds from start to finish.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mickey malone View PostThe Ring don't even have him in their top 100 punchers of all time!!!!
Hence the main reason for this thread... It's a diabolical liberty!
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostOkay, the ring list was for the 100 GREATEST punchers not the 100 HARDEST punchers: Power, while an important component, is only one of the factors considered in creating the list. This is why Earnie Shavers didn't top the list. While I agree Bruno is one of the hardest punchers ever (and I've caught ****e before for saying it), I don't think he was one of the greatest punchers. A good example is I remember reading where a common opponent said Bruno was a harder puncher than Tyson; but I don't think anyone would descibe Frank as a BETTER puncher than Tyson. Think of it like a comparison between Shavers and Foreman: Shavers a slightly harder puncher than Foreman; Foreman a better overall puncher than Shavers.
Poet
Great or Hard, not to make the top 100 is criminal in Bruno's case..
Comment
-
Originally posted by mickey malone View PostBut do they have an AT Hardest punchers list?...
Originally posted by mickey malone View PostMy main point is, that they have massive limitations in recognizing overseas fighters.. In my opinion, they either put em away, or they don't.. Bruno's the reason why no one's ever KO'd McCall...Great or Hard, not to make the top 100 is criminal in Bruno's case..
Poet
Comment
Comment