Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Computer Tournament - The Featherweights

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    why are you doing these turd tournaments poet? they prove nothing and you are just basically randoming who wins out of a hat.

    you just continue to block the history up with these turd tournaments.

    give it a miss will you.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by maniaboxing222 View Post
      why are you doing these turd tournaments poet? they prove nothing and you are just basically randoming who wins out of a hat.

      you just continue to block the history up with these turd tournaments.

      give it a miss will you.
      Well Tunney's alt, if you don't like them don't read them. BTW, Kurt Angle is a butt pirate. It's true. Oh, it's DAMN true.

      Poet

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by maniaboxing222 View Post
        why are you doing these turd tournaments poet? they prove nothing and you are just basically randoming who wins out of a hat.

        you just continue to block the history up with these turd tournaments.

        give it a miss will you.
        True they don't really prove much but are fun and are more boxing based than a lot of stuff that gets started on here.

        Comment


        • #14
          Bump......

          Comment


          • #15
            Bump......

            Comment


            • #16
              i think the old school guys get too much of the benefit of the doubt.

              comparing old school greats vs new school greats;incredible bias for oldschool greats vs the modern greats.

              it happens it a lot of sports but significantly in boxing.

              what simulation program u use poet? could you post the programs boxing attribute ratings?

              Comment


              • #17
                Barrera should be higher than Pac tbh.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by GetSumBrah View Post
                  i think the old school guys get too much of the benefit of the doubt.

                  comparing old school greats vs new school greats;incredible bias for oldschool greats vs the modern greats.

                  it happens it a lot of sports but significantly in boxing.

                  what simulation program u use poet? could you post the programs boxing attribute ratings?
                  Well, considering way too many under 30 posters automatically assume that the current crop is the best ever because they're the latest (you know, every generatin is exponentially better than the previous one BS?).

                  The program used is Title Bout II. Which fighters did you want to see the attributes for?

                  Poet

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                    Third installment:


                    The Featherweights

                    1. Alexis Arguello 1,634-299-67 (1,227) .834
                    2. Willie Pep 1,546-397-57 (601) .787
                    3. Jem Driscoll 1,418-501-81 (696) .729
                    4. Abe Attell 1,339-538-123 (524) .700
                    5. Salvador Sanchez 1,334-588-78 (757) .687
                    6. Sandy Saddler 1,321-632-47 (1,062) .672
                    7. Manny Pacquiao 1,295-664-41 (1,089) .658
                    8. Vincente Saldivar 1,198-752-50 (924) .612
                    9. Marco Antonio Barrera 1,120-804-76 (734) .579
                    10. Kid Chocolate 955-952-93 (460) .501
                    11. Young Griffo 908-960-132 (266) .487
                    12. Eusebio Pedrosa 879-1,027-94 (470) .463
                    13. Johnny Kilbane 817-1,057-126 (278) .440
                    14. Naseem Hamed 812-1,126-62 (566) .422
                    15. Juan Manuel Marquez 752-1,196-52 (483) .389
                    16. Kevin Kelly 716-1,237-47 (466) .370
                    17. Danny Lopez 642-1,338-20 (530) .326
                    18. Juan LaPorte 587-1,362-51 (361) .306
                    19. Sergio Palma 496-1,434-70 (214) .266
                    20. Oscar Larios 330-1,641-29 (224) .172
                    21. ****** Vasquez 188-1,782-30 (108) .102
                    How do I work out all those numbers ??... what do they all mean ????..... excuse my ignorance.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Demise View Post
                      Barrera should be higher than Pac tbh.
                      News Flash !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Pacman beat the stuffin' out 'o him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP