Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muhammed Ali Vs. Wladimir Klitschko Computer Matchup

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Sugarj View Post
    I'll bet that Floyd wins the majority of matches in a computer matchup with Pacquiou! I see that fight as a genuine 50/50 at welterweight right now (in real life!). But Pacquiou's earlier stoppage losses will no doubt prove the determining statistical factor to the computer and the fact that he was outboxed by another orthodox fighter in Moralles.
    Actually I just ran it and Pacquiao is the clear winner by 68-26-6 over Mayweather. Manny had 46 stoppages, Floyd had 15.

    Poet

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
      This is in response to the spait of "old-timer" bashing by certain parties over in NSB. Ali and Wlad are matched up 100 times on two different boxing simulation programs and here are the results:


      Title Bout Boxing II

      Muhammed Ali 94-5-1 with 87 stoppages
      Wladimir Klitschko 5-94-1 with 4 stoppages


      Data Boxing

      Muhammed Ali 91-7-2 with 60 stoppages
      Wladimir Klitschko 7-91-2 with 2 stoppages

      LOL!! ******!!

      I don't argue with a guy arguing with boxing simulation programms...

      So I repeat,******!!!

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
        LOL!! ******!!

        I don't argue with a guy arguing with boxing simulation programms...

        So I repeat,******!!!
        Oh ho! We have another NSB troll slithering in! Don't argue with a trolling nuthugger from NSB: Just make fun of his pathetic ass :hahahaha9:

        Poet

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Morales_ View Post
          What about the Ali that fought Berbick.

          Does he still beat Wlad ?
          Wlad wins that matchup 95-4-1 getting 55 stoppages. The 5 he didn't win are practically statistical enamolies (at some point Wlad slipped and busted his head).

          Poet

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View Post
            Actually that's a good way of judging how accurate the program really is. You can run through many past fights and compare the outcomes.

            Tyson-Douglas would be interesting............
            The Tyson of Tokyo versus the Douglas of Tokyo has Douglas a clear winner by 75-24-1. Douglas scored 58 stoppages, Tyson 17.

            Poet

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
              Actually I just ran it and Pacquiao is the clear winner by 68-26-6 over Mayweather. Manny had 46 stoppages, Floyd had 15.

              Poet
              Pacquiao has never been matched with an african-american slick fighter. The computer doesnt have the data to judge Pacquiao correctly.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View Post
                Actually that's a good way of judging how accurate the program really is. You can run through many past fights and compare the outcomes.

                Tyson-Douglas would be interesting............

                LOL!!
                Those programms are jokes.
                Ali was beating cruiserweights,we and the computer don't know,if modern heavyweights hit harder or not,if they are weaker or tougher ect...

                I don't like to compare modern eras to former eras...

                I'm tempted to think modern heavyweights hits harder being on average biggers and heaviers.
                But I don't know that,I didn't tested a Wlad's punch,a Brewster's punch and a Frazier's punch.
                Fazier was a scary puncher,but maybe those giants hit harder.

                Too much things the computer and us don't know.

                This **** is plain garbage.

                Get some help dudes.

                IF...
                If a guy like Chuck Wepner fought 15 rounds with Ali.
                How Ali is going to ko Wlad 70% of the time??



                I don't care about that PRIDE WAR BETWEEN EUROS AND AMERICANS.
                Of course boxin medias are americans,so Ali is the legend,and Wlad the bum.

                If Eddie would have beat Wlad,and defended his titles 10 times,he would be the next great(afro american champion)but they will NEVER praise a robotic eastern european.
                They will never accept Wlad.

                Wlad could walk on the water(he's almost doing it) he would still be a walk in the park for Ali and Dempsey according to BLIND AMERICAN("boxing")FANS.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Morales_ View Post
                  Pacquiao has never been matched with an african-american slick fighter. The computer doesnt have the data to judge Pacquiao correctly.
                  Sorry dude, but the program doesn't give a rat's ass about the race of fighters.....and neither should you.

                  Poet

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by BillyBoxing View Post
                    LOL!!
                    Those programms are jokes.
                    Ali was beating cruiserweights,we and the computer don't know,if modern heavyweights hit harder or not,if they are weaker or tougher ect...

                    I don't like to compare modern eras to former eras...

                    I'm tempted to think modern heavyweights hits harder being on average biggers and heaviers.
                    But I don't know that,I didn't tested a Wlad's punch,a Brewster's punch and a Frazier's punch.
                    Fazier was a scary puncher,but maybe those giants hit harder.

                    Too much things the computer and us don't know.

                    This **** is plain garbage.

                    Get some help dudes.

                    IF...
                    If a guy like Chuck Wepner fought 15 rounds with Ali.
                    How Ali is going to ko Wlad 70% of the time??



                    I don't care about that PRIDE WAR BETWEEN EUROS AND AMERICANS.
                    Of course boxin medias are americans,so Ali is the legend,and Wlad the bum.

                    If Eddie would have beat Wlad,and defended his titles 10 times,he would be the next great(afro american champion)but they will NEVER praise a robotic eastern european.
                    They will never accept Wlad.

                    Wlad could walk on the water(he's almost doing it) he would still be a walk in the park for Ali and Dempsey according to BLIND AMERICAN("boxing")FANS.
                    Your trolling is finished here.....have a nice day!

                    Poet

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by poet682006 View Post
                      Okay. Battling Nelson Vs. Floyd Mayweather Jr. Here are the results:


                      Title Bout II

                      Floyd Mayweather Jr. 89-9-2 with 64 stoppages
                      Battling Nelson 9-89-2 with 4 stoppages


                      Data Boxing

                      Floyd Mayweather Jr. 85-12-3 with 3 stoppages
                      Battling Nelson 12-85-3 with 4 stoppages
                      Interesting, Floyd stops Battling Nelson, who is one of if not the most durable boxer ever, 64 times out of 89?. He'd easily win on points but he's in no way stopping Nelson lol. 3 is more realistic in this case.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP