Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dempsey's plastered wraps. Dempsey-Willard revisited.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Dempsey and Willard: The Worst Beating in Boxing History?

    by B. R. Bearden

    It is 1919 and the heavyweight champion of the world is a giant named Jess Willard. The 6'6 ½", 245 pound Willard had taken the title from an over-the-hill Jack Johnson, ending the search for a "great white hope" to dethrone the great but unpopular black champion. His newest challenger is a savage fighter out of the west by the name of Jack Dempsey, who at 6'1" and 187 pounds seems to belong to a weight class several places below Jess. The fight is set for the 4th of July in Toledo, Ohio and thousands of fans have paid to sit in a sweltering heat and watch the contest.

    Prior to the start of the fight, promoter Tex Rickard visits Dempsey and his manager Jack "Doc" Kearns in his dressing room. Kearns had to all but beg Tex to set up a fight between his man and the giant Willard, a battle that seems a mismatch on size alone. "Every time I see Willard he looks bigger and every time I see you, you look smaller," a worried Rickard says to the lean, hard Dempsey. He urges Jack to stay down if Willard knocks him down; he doesn't want to be associated with a murder in front of thousands of witnesses.

    Dempsey growls there's nothing to worry about. He has no fear of Willard, or any other man. In the dark thoughts of The Manassa Mauler, Willard's size represents a bigger target, not a threat. There's a fire smoldering in Dempsey, a hunger burning since his days as a hobo who fought in the back alleys behind bars for the price of a meal. From the time he was 15 he's fought grown men, often giving up fifty or more pounds; sometimes taking a terrible beating. No, he doesn't fear Willard.

    In the ring the champion appears calm and confident. He towers over the smaller man but anyone looking at the sun bronzed frame and tightly packed muscles of Dempsey can see the contrast. Willard is bigger but he's not in the shape of the challenger. He looks soft whereas Dempsey looks like a coiled spring without an ounce of fat, his hair shaved close on the sides of his head only adding to the fierce aspect of the man. It's a look Mike Tyson will emulate 65 years later.

    The bell rings and Dempsey comes after the champion as if he's hated him all his life. He is savage, he is relentless, he is a demon in boxing gloves. Willard goes down from a terrific punch and The Mauler stands over him. The neutral corner rule won't be introduced to boxing until seven years later, time Willard doesn't have, and Jack stands over the fallen man. By the rules of the day he's allowed to hit the opponent as soon as his knees are off the floor. Many fighters step back, give their foe a chance to rise, but not Dempsey; in the ring he has the instincts of a natural killer. Jess rises and Dempsey pounces, raining lethal blows upon his head, driving his gloves to the wrists in the big man's belly.

    Dempsey has bet his entire share of the purse at 10-1 odds that he will knock Willard out in the first round and it appears he means to do it even at the cost of Willard's life. There's a snarl on the face of Dempsey that reminds those at ringside more of a blood-mad tiger than a man; decades later old men who were there that day will still comment on the bared teeth and blazing eyes of the Mauler as if recalling some nightmare never forgotten. The primal fury of Dempsey is not to be denied. Before the round ends Jess is down seven times. His body is covered in ugly red welts, he's bleeding from a shattered nose and mashed lips. Barely he beats the bell and is helped to his corner. So sure is Demsey that the contest is over that he leaves the ring. But Willard doesn't want to quit and the referee won't gainsay the champion; Dempsey is called back to the ring just in time to make the bell. The beating continues.

    Two more brutal rounds and more trips to the canvas for Willard. He is hit with uppercuts, left hooks, overhand rights; thudding, painful blows from every angle. When he holds onto the ropes to rise Dempsey smashes him with punches, when he tries to hold Dempsey tears free and pummels him. Jess is literally beaten from post to post and even the crowd who paid to see this are shouting for it to be stopped. Somehow Willard survives the second and third rounds, but on his stool after the third the champion is near-dead and his second throws in the towel. Even then, Willard disagrees and wants to continue; he sets the bar by which a champion loses his title to a height as tall as himself. But there won't be a forth round and perhaps Jess's life hinges on that respite.

    Dempsey's hand is raised in victory as Willard is helped from the ring. Those supporting his tortured frame hear him mutter to himself, over and over, "I have a farm in Iowa and a hundred thousand in the bank. I have a farm."

    The doctors tend to the ex-champ, amazed he withstood such a beating without dying. His injuries resemble the result of a bad car crash more than a boxing match; nose completely smashed, cheek bone cracked, jaw broken in seven places, four front teeth somewhere back in the ring, broken ribs, partial loss of hearing in one ear. Someone remarks that one more round and he'd be dead; he is already on the verge.

    Later there would be allegations of loaded gloves on the part of Dempsey, based on the words of a disgruntled member of his camp and the opinion of boxing experts, and Willard, that no man could hit so hard. It's claimed he wrapped his hands in bandages soaked in Plaster-of-Paris. The inventor of the product comes to the US to testify to the impossibility of using Plaster-of-Paris without breaking all the bones in the hands. It would be like striking a cement wall with bare hands. Doc Kearns adds fuel to the fire, and angers Willard, by joking, "Naw, I didn't use plaster of Paris on the bandages. It was cement."

    A study of the film gives the explanation to the injuries. A big, overmatched fighter is hurt by the first solid punch and for three rounds plays the part of a human punching bag. The lack of a neutral corner rule allows Dempsey to hit him while he's rising or hanging on the ropes, when his body isn't prepared for the impact. Just as Houdini would die after taking an unexpected punch which ruptured his appendix, Jess Willard's body absorbs a greater degree of force than he would were he ready for the punches. The shock of impact of Dempsey's blows isn't lessened by rolling with the punch or allowing the force to push the man back, it's taken in its totality by the big body of Willard and something has to give. Bones break and teeth crumble and Jess Willard survives by the margin of minutes, perhaps only seconds, one of the worst beatings in the history of prize fighting.

    Comment


    • #12
      I thought the loaded gloves claims had been debunked years ago. Monte Cox did a case study of it and concluded that Willard's injuries were not as substantial as history recalls:

      http://coxscorner.tripod.com/dempsey_gloves.html

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Kid McCoy View Post
        I thought the loaded gloves claims had been debunked years ago. Monte Cox did a case study of it and concluded that Willard's injuries were not as substantial as history recalls:

        http://coxscorner.tripod.com/dempsey_gloves.html
        ** Makes Ferdie look like a tool.

        I would point out Joe Louis had a signature bout like this in the Schmeling rematch. Schmeling busted up in a singular manner that Joe never duplicated before or after.

        It's 2009 and the officials haven't even made a decent case for the wraps of Margarito being "loaded" although clearly he had something not of regulation.

        Did a little experiment on a leg cast I'd kept from a decades ago motorcycle accident because a friend had painted some Peter Max type art work on it. After a humongous rainstorm I tossed it out on my compost pile to break up. Humidity near 100%, and the Marg controversy came up.

        So I grabbed it, held it against a big oak with one hand and popped it with the other. The humidity had softened it enough for me to ding with a 6" pop. Folks, it rains in those gloves. An iron bolt is way too obvious and risky not to mention you could break your fingers.

        Now, in Marg's case, plaster today can be of the hardened, water proof epoxy blend, but still, how much is a thin strip gonna gain? It's not like there's any scientific proof it works. I like the leaded tape theory if we go down the loaded gloves route, but then every fighter could be suspect on an unexpected KO.

        Gauze wraps are a plasterless cast to protect the hands already. The added benefit is they allow a fighter to produce more power which is why the KO% have been going up since introduction of gloves and wraps.

        As far as Jess's injuries, I believe there are quotes where he recounts his injuries and allows reporters to feel some broken spots. Jaw busted in 13 places sounds over the top though for example. Arthur Abraham had his busted in 4 places by Miranda is the claim with the loss of something like 2 liters of blood, also over the top.

        Who knows? Dempsey sure looks open and confident though. Poor Jess got flattened.

        Dempsey ended up with the best combinations to start and finish a title. The combo that knocked Willard down in the beginning, just wicked quick and deadly, and the same deal in the Long Count sequence. Jack could really put it together.
        Last edited by LondonRingRules; 04-23-2009, 09:51 PM.

        Comment


        • #14
          I've heard very good argments on both sides of this issue. Gunboat Smith said he and a lot of fighters would regularly wear "loaded gloves."

          http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/078...pf_rd_i=507846

          Comment


          • #15
            I don’t really think Dempsey's gloves were loaded, Dempsey landed loads of clean punches on Williard in the first round and its more than possible to cut someone's face up with legal gloves look at Vitali vs Lewis, Willard was an erect target for Dempsey he had no head movement and Dempsey was able to hit him at will. I will not take anything away from Dempsey for this win until there is actual 100% proof that he had loaded gloves, and there are plenty of pics of him pre fight before he had the gloves on.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Kid McCoy View Post
              I thought the loaded gloves claims had been debunked years ago. Monte Cox did a case study of it and concluded that Willard's injuries were not as substantial as history recalls:

              http://coxscorner.tripod.com/dempsey_gloves.html
              That was a great read! Thanks.

              A have few tiny remarks.

              First to the fighters being interviewed postfight. It was common for newspapers to print interviews or the fighters self-written statements after a big fight. I seriously doubt that it was always the fighter who answered or wrote the story. More likely the story was based on comments by the seconds.

              Second is in regard to the plastering. The boxing illustrated piece allegedly shows that the outlined procedure by Kearns is impossible. Well what is the right procedure if you want to cheat with plaster of paris? We know for a fact that Luis Resto's wraps were plastered in his fight with Billy Collins jr. We also know that Antonio Margarito's wrappings contained a 'plasterlike substance'. What did they do to prevent the hands and fingers from breaking?

              Maybe a job for 'Mythbusters'?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
                We know for a fact that Luis Resto's wraps were plastered in his fight with Billy Collins jr.
                ** No, the plaster claim only came years later when Resto was doing his sob story true confessions trying to be reinstated as a cornerman.

                Don't recall any plaster claims in the day. It was always about the gloves and padding removed. Panama Lewis denies everything and has largely kept mum on the matter, probably figuring it's a no win situation he's in.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by LondonRingRules View Post
                  ** No, the plaster claim only came years later when Resto was doing his sob story true confessions trying to be reinstated as a cornerman.

                  Don't recall any plaster claims in the day. It was always about the gloves and padding removed. Panama Lewis denies everything and has largely kept mum on the matter, probably figuring it's a no win situation he's in.
                  That's right. Resto and Lewis were convicted based on removal of the padding. The plasterconfession came later from Resto.

                  Regardless. I've read about several trying to cheat with plaster but is still puzzled as to how that might work. According to eyewitnesses in the Marg scandal there was a hardened gauze with plasterlike substance in the wrappings. I could see that be very harmfull and still protective of the hand if applied properly.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by black.ink View Post
                    It's hard to imagine a small Heavyweight in Jack Dempsey, no matter how brutal he hit, to destroy a big man in Jess Willard in the fashion he did in a fair way.
                    Louis gave Carnera a fairly comprehensive beating and quite a size differential there. Willard wasn't a particularily good fighter Dempsey was an ATG.
                    I think the loaded gloves is an urban myth, though I know that Willard thought to his dying day Dempsey's gloves were loaded. A lot of fighters like an excuse though.
                    It was a great fighter Dempsey's greatest fight, it was just unlucky for an out of shape poor champion he got in the way.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      First post here, greetings all from Poland. The mystery of this fight interested me long ago. Now, after a several hours spent on the forum, I think am happy to find a good place to discuss thoughts with true fans and knowledgeable people.

                      Here is another good article about the issue:

                      thecruelestsport.com/2013/05/07/hard-times-the-mystery-of-the-jack-dempsey-jess-willard-fight

                      (I cannot put url so copy and paste it, please)

                      I personally tend to agree with the author's su****ions that something was wrong there; of course do not believe in plaster or iron rod stories but in special hardening techniques for bandages -- why not ? Dempsey was a great puncher but this was too much IMO. Bone fractures are rare thing.
                      The problem in all sports is always to jeopardize the position of a well-accepted champion and throwing him/her from a pedestal. I think this is the issue here -- Dempsey could win fair, but he (deliberately or not) chooses a way to be more ensured about the positive outcome against the favourite. Similarily to Ali with the famous ropes tension in the battle against Foreman -- I feel deep inside something was on with that.

                      Cheers all

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP