When Naseem Hamed is brought up, critics immediately seem to push him down, saying he only ever beat nobodies, and only seem to remember his loss against Berrera.
I'll admit he's anywhere near the greatest of all time, but he was pretty damn unique; from his loud mouth, flashy enterances, in ring dancing I think Naz really brought in the entertainment to boxing. From a personality point of view I don't think anyone can match him, he was pretty much a spectacle, and guys like me (who wasn't a boxing fan at the time) would tune in to see the Naz.
As for his career, he did a pretty good job of that too, he was by far the best in his weight division, as for his match against Berrera, it was obvious the Prince wasn't at his prime, and he lacked the enthusiam he had earlier in his career, but he still put on a good fight, and with the talk of Barrera taking steroids, Naz should have won anyway.
Thoughts on Naz? Was he overrated and all hype? Or are the critics too harsh? Discuss.
I'll admit he's anywhere near the greatest of all time, but he was pretty damn unique; from his loud mouth, flashy enterances, in ring dancing I think Naz really brought in the entertainment to boxing. From a personality point of view I don't think anyone can match him, he was pretty much a spectacle, and guys like me (who wasn't a boxing fan at the time) would tune in to see the Naz.
As for his career, he did a pretty good job of that too, he was by far the best in his weight division, as for his match against Berrera, it was obvious the Prince wasn't at his prime, and he lacked the enthusiam he had earlier in his career, but he still put on a good fight, and with the talk of Barrera taking steroids, Naz should have won anyway.
Thoughts on Naz? Was he overrated and all hype? Or are the critics too harsh? Discuss.
Comment