Is Lennox Lewis The Greatest HW Of All Time?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Parody
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 13685
    • 538
    • 734
    • 21,205

    #31
    Originally posted by Panamaniac
    Are you serious?! What, are you 10 years old?! Lennox Lewis is not even in the top 10! Hell, I rate Mike Tyson ahead of him!
    Are you freaking kidding me?

    Comment

    • j
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2003
      • 4694
      • 210
      • 26
      • 11,831

      #32
      what lewis's ranking is should be considered opinion only.

      he has/had to tools to beat any boxer at least once. i say the same about the k brothers - especially vitaly and that mean streak he has.

      the above mentioned stand a chance against anyone. that much you can say, and that is as far as it really should be taken!

      and, even though i hate lists, how could you rank tyson above lewis? this is not directed at you, parody, as we obviously agree that lewis could beat the hell out of mike more than mike could beat ll.

      Comment

      • j
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2003
        • 4694
        • 210
        • 26
        • 11,831

        #33
        Quote:
        Originally Posted by Panamaniac
        Are you serious?! What, are you 10 years old?! Lennox Lewis is not even in the top 10! Hell, I rate Mike Tyson ahead of him!

        Are you freaking kidding me?
        __________________

        yeah, who are you kiddin'? tyson had a huge hype machine. ll didn't. at least not in the states. and ll, although reluctuntly and after ducking him for a year and a half or more, fought big brother klitschko - the baddest and most underrated fighter at the time. and he beat him, although there should be an asterisk next to that fight the way vitali protested it - he obviously had a lot left in the tank. nonetheless, he did get a W in the column that night. something i'm not sure a primed tyson could do. in fact, i'd say a prime tyson couldn't do it at all.

        lewis would def be higher than tyson if i had a list.

        Comment

        • BrooklynBomber
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2004
          • 28365
          • 1,563
          • 1,544
          • 44,979

          #34
          Originally posted by j
          what lewis's ranking is should be considered opinion only.

          he has/had to tools to beat any boxer at least once. i say the same about the k brothers - especially vitaly and that mean streak he has.

          the above mentioned stand a chance against anyone. that much you can say, and that is as far as it really should be taken!

          and, even though i hate lists, how could you rank tyson above lewis? this is not directed at you, parody, as we obviously agree that lewis could beat the hell out of mike more than mike could beat ll.
          Agreed, Lewis on a good day can(does not mean will) beat absolutely any other heavyweight in the world.

          Comment

          • j
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2003
            • 4694
            • 210
            • 26
            • 11,831

            #35
            Agreed, Lewis on a good day can(does not mean will) beat absolutely any other heavyweight in the world.
            right!

            same with both klitschko bros. especially vitali. the newer version of wladimir would possibly do the same.

            but i stress VK and LL for a reason. to me, they seem to have what it takes to win.

            explaining a lil, so as to not change subject much here:

            lewis, was a big 6'5"/6'6" or so. he's a big boy from the start. combine his reach, great jabbing, intelligent use or punches, great coordination for a guy his size, and good stamina and you have a beast. a great fighter. and with his experience, although i wish he would've fought byrd arounf 1999 or 2000, he is a hell of a fighter. this, cannot be argued.

            and vitali, was even bigger - standing around 6'8". he had a great reach, a potentially powerfull punch in every punch thrown, a steel chin, good stamina, a most unusual style, and a freakish ability to "know" when and where punches are coming most of the time. i relate to his punch "reading" as it is common in martial arts to be training in these areas. VK also had great experience from kickboxing.

            both, would give any heavy from any other era hell.

            Comment

            • BrooklynBomber
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2004
              • 28365
              • 1,563
              • 1,544
              • 44,979

              #36
              Originally posted by j
              right!

              same with both klitschko bros. especially vitali. the newer version of wladimir would possibly do the same.

              but i stress VK and LL for a reason. to me, they seem to have what it takes to win.

              explaining a lil, so as to not change subject much here:

              lewis, was a big 6'5"/6'6" or so. he's a big boy from the start. combine his reach, great jabbing, intelligent use or punches, great coordination for a guy his size, and good stamina and you have a beast. a great fighter. and with his experience, although i wish he would've fought byrd arounf 1999 or 2000, he is a hell of a fighter. this, cannot be argued.

              and vitali, was even bigger - standing around 6'8". he had a great reach, a potentially powerfull punch in every punch thrown, a steel chin, good stamina, a most unusual style, and a freakish ability to "know" when and where punches are coming most of the time. i relate to his punch "reading" as it is common in martial arts to be training in these areas. VK also had great experience from kickboxing.

              both, would give any heavy from any other era hell.
              People are too reluctant to sacrifice the holy cows of the past. But everyone is beatable. And that goes especially for the HW top ten. The fighters there are just that good.

              Comment

              • tills9191
                Interim Champion
                • Nov 2007
                • 878
                • 53
                • 16
                • 7,694

                #37
                so your saying the great larry holmes won't be able to compete with the robotic vitali??

                Comment

                • j
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2003
                  • 4694
                  • 210
                  • 26
                  • 11,831

                  #38
                  People are too reluctant to sacrifice the holy cows of the past. But everyone is beatable. And that goes especially for the HW top ten. The fighters there are just that good
                  fo sure. you are quite right. when it comes to the higher ranks of boxers, it becomes more of a tossup bteween all of 'em. and i don't buy into the tyson hype, or the ali hype. hype is hype. unless the fighters we are talking about actually fought, and fought more than twice, we can only guess.

                  so your saying the great larry holmes won't be able to compete with the robotic vitali??
                  how can holmes compete with robotic efficiency???

                  all kidding aside, vitali is much more of a threat any other boxer than you might imagine.

                  what you don't see, i do.

                  Comment

                  • tills9191
                    Interim Champion
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 878
                    • 53
                    • 16
                    • 7,694

                    #39
                    Originally posted by j
                    fo sure. you are quite right. when it comes to the higher ranks of boxers, it becomes more of a tossup bteween all of 'em. and i don't buy into the tyson hype, or the ali hype. hype is hype. unless the fighters we are talking about actually fought, and fought more than twice, we can only guess.



                    how can holmes compete with robotic efficiency???

                    all kidding aside, vitali is much more of a threat any other boxer than you might imagine.

                    what you don't see, i do.
                    , that's a good point.
                    I just don't see why you so highly regard the current HW fighters , especially seeing the current state of the HW division.

                    Comment

                    • robjr
                      Retro...
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 7982
                      • 742
                      • 408
                      • 14,815

                      #40
                      I dont need to read anything.. the thread title was enough.. 1 star for thread.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP