Punching Power Debate : Mike Tyson v.s George Foreman
Collapse
-
This is the whole point of this thread, the debate is about power not quality of shot.
Foreman, Shavers even Bruno had more raw punching power than Mike Tyson but Tyson's punches were quicker, more accurate and came together in bunches, therefore in summary Tyson was a better technical hitter but Foreman had more punching power.Comment
-
PS. Don't underestimate young Foreman's straight ahead speed: You blink and he was on you like stink on ****. Straight ahead Foreman was a cobra.
PoetComment
-
Oh. As a side note I believe Foreman still holds the Heavyweight record for career knockout percentage and this despite not recording a single KO after Michael Moorer. Whether you're judging by pure power or punching effectiveness that record shows Foreman was pretty damn effective.
And some nitwit was comparing Tyson's KO of Berbick favorably over Foreman's KO of Frazier. I'll make this VERY simple: Berbick has no right to be used in the same sentence as Frazier. Frazier was an all-time-great, Berbick was a journeyman at best. There is absolutely NO comparison.
PoetComment
-
I don't doubt it Versi. Mike always had better knowledge of past fighters than any fighter I've heard of. That's where my respect for Tyson comes from: HIS respect for Boxing, it's history, and the fighters that came before him.
PS. Don't underestimate young Foreman's straight ahead speed: You blink and he was on you like stink on ****. Straight ahead Foreman was a cobra.
Poet
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ki4UKsI8bms He says it at 4:33 of the video.Comment
-
Comment
Comment