Gerald McClellan, Great, or the Greatest Middleweight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • XionComrade
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2005
    • 1017
    • 37
    • 9
    • 7,483

    #1

    Gerald McClellan, Great, or the Greatest Middleweight?

    Ok, I don't think he is the greatest by no means :P but I rank him in the top 20 greatest/best Middleweights of all time.

    I respect BoxingScene's oppinion, so what do you guys think? Do you think McClellan is a all time great? He beat Mugabi, Jackson 2x, and was beating Benn before tragedy struck! As well as his physical talents, he was the hardest hitting middleweight in history!
  • brownpimp88
    Mike Tyson the Third
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2006
    • 1552
    • 36
    • 1
    • 7,865

    #2
    potential /= greatness

    Comment

    • Emon723
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 1439
      • 19
      • 0
      • 9,785

      #3
      he could have been Great, not just in middleweight or supermiddleweight but pound for pound, dont see how roy jones or anybody below 168 can beat him, if emmanuel steward was in his corner in the Benn fight, who knows, Gerald went into Benn's territory and had to fight two men, including the referee along with Benn's rabid punches, that is courageous enough.

      Comment

      • The Noose
        AKA Bologna Panini
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Aug 2004
        • 12082
        • 1,040
        • 826
        • 44,455

        #4
        Originally posted by XionComrade
        Ok, I don't think he is the greatest by no means :P but I rank him in the top 20 greatest/best Middleweights of all time.

        I respect BoxingScene's oppinion, so what do you guys think? Do you think McClellan is a all time great? He beat Mugabi, Jackson 2x, and was beating Benn before tragedy struck! As well as his physical talents, he was the hardest hitting middleweight in history!
        WAS beating Benn??
        He lost to Benn.

        He was trying too hard to KO Benn, and showed his defence was very poor.

        McClellan was a potential great. Nothing more.

        Jackson, Mugabi were at the end of their careers. Benn was even not as good as he once was. But McCllelan for me was indded a great fighter. His career ended way too soon for me to really see how great he was.

        Comment

        • eazy_mas
          Pride kills the champ
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2005
          • 9758
          • 244
          • 309
          • 17,756

          #5
          the G-Man is the greatest IMO.

          you rarely see anyone from America coming to britian to fight or visa versa.

          but after that tradgey it was also bad for british boxing because now less and less boxers are welling to fight there and that is bad for britian

          Comment

          • Franko
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2006
            • 407
            • 18
            • 0
            • 6,795

            #6
            Originally posted by Bobby Pazuzu
            WAS beating Benn??
            He lost to Benn.

            He was trying too hard to KO Benn, and showed his defence was very poor.

            McClellan was a potential great. Nothing more.

            Jackson, Mugabi were at the end of their careers. Benn was even not as good as he once was. But McCllelan for me was indded a great fighter. His career ended way too soon for me to really see how great he was.
            I think the point that Xioncomrade was trying to make was that McClellan was ahead on the judges scorecards when Benn stopped him, so yes he was winning the fight.

            McClellan was certainly a very talented fighter, but i don't think that he could be labelled a great fighter, and i base that on the longevity of his career.

            McClellan became a one dimensional fighter, and he simply had no plan B against Benn when the early knock out didn't materialise. Had he changed tact a little and boxed Benn then who knows, but instead, he engaged Benn in a war, and the rest is history.
            People question McClellans' defence against Benn, but his offence had become his defence, if you like. He wanted to knock guys out, and knock them out quick. Emmanuel Steward would have made McClellan a better fighter IMO, but allegedly Steward wanted McClellan to work towards more of a boxing style which would enable him to work on his defence, and get more rounds under his belt, but McClellan had a different mindset.

            Comment

            • Phantasm
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Mar 2005
              • 1497
              • 67
              • 33
              • 7,978

              #7
              He was a great middleweight during his time and had POTENTIAL to be an all time great. I agree his defense wasnt great, but he hit like a mule. It's really subjective, since we wont ever know how he would have done had his career not end.

              Comment

              • GEOFFHAYES
                Juy Hayes
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Mar 2006
                • 6547
                • 349
                • 7
                • 14,036

                #8
                His career was over before it really began.

                Comment

                • Hydro
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 1673
                  • 81
                  • 16
                  • 8,227

                  #9
                  of course he was not an all-time great.

                  he was a good fighter who could have been possibly been great, but unfortunately, his career ended prematurely.

                  Comment

                  • The Surgeon
                    Days Of Glory
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 15385
                    • 712
                    • 1,578
                    • 24,784

                    #10
                    Originally posted by XionComrade
                    Ok, I don't think he is the greatest by no means :P but I rank him in the top 20 greatest/best Middleweights of all time.

                    I respect BoxingScene's oppinion, so what do you guys think? Do you think McClellan is a all time great? He beat Mugabi, Jackson 2x, and was beating Benn before tragedy struck! As well as his physical talents, he was the hardest hitting middleweight in history!
                    He did little to deserve the spot record wise but in head to head matches i think he'd be one of the best yeah

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP