Heavyweight scenario if Tyson didnt went to prison

[BmoreBrawler]

1. Would Foreman won the title at age 45 if Tyson was there.-Yes, because Tyson wouldve been in trouble for something else and likely wouldve left a paper title vacant at some point.

2. Will Bowe-Lewis happen just the same.-Dunno.

3. Lewis-Tyson happening as early as lets say 93'?-I think it still happens late, around 97, with either Tyson winning on KO or Lewis outpointing him, depending on how Tyson's training had gone by then.

4. Will Holyfield gave Holmes a title shot if he already fought Tyson.-not sure.

5. a dream Tyson-Foreman match up became a reality.-absolutely

[realheavyhands]

Very Enertaining Kdogg. But Tysons Style Was A Built To Last Style

[Verstyle]

how bout this scenerio. who gives a **** cause it didnt happen or nor will it probably happen that way

[brownpimp88]

The heavyweight talent in the 1990's was solid, i dont know why people say it was weak. It was better than the talent in the 80's, 40's, 30's and 20's.

[realheavyhands]

the 80s and 90s were better then now.. but the 70s had ali foreman liston frazier lyle shavers norton

[K-DOGG]

Very Enertaining Kdogg. But Tysons Style Was A Built To Last Style

Well, honestly, no it wasn't; but, for the sake of arguement, lets say it was....he abandonned it when he dumped Rooney, so that's really a moot arguement.

Evidence of Mike's decline can be seen in almost every fight after Spinks....Bruno, Douglas...obviously, Ruddock, even Williams. That winging, looking for the one shot thing was eventually going to get him beat.

[realheavyhands]

Well, honestly, no it wasn't; but, for the sake of arguement, lets say it was....he abandonned it when he dumped Rooney, so that's really a moot arguement.

Evidence of Mike's decline can be seen in almost every fight after Spinks....Bruno, Douglas...obviously, Ruddock, even Williams. That winging, looking for the one shot thing was eventually going to get him beat.

he was built to last.. and if he wasnt hat means cus dmato ****ed when he was making him cuz when you young your body can do certain things and when you mature its gets stringer and tightiens up .... that maybe why teddy altas trained michael moorer.... he was a southpaw and was going to be what tyson was supposed to be... but he didnt have the body .. after tyson built up his right by fighting orthodox maybe he should of swiched back .. things take time..

[Verstyle]

i think tyson woulda still been winning. buuuuuuuut then again i didnt like the way he fought ruddock in the early 90s

[butterfly1964]

the 80s and 90s were better then now.. but the 70s had ali foreman liston frazier lyle shavers norton

The '90's was probably the best decade in heavyweight history, besides the '70s.

[K-DOGG]

he was built to last.. and if he wasnt hat means cus dmato ****ed when he was making him cuz when you young your body can do certain things and when you mature its gets stringer and tightiens up .... that maybe why teddy altas trained michael moorer.... he was a southpaw and was going to be what tyson was supposed to be... but he didnt have the body .. after tyson built up his right by fighting orthodox maybe he should of swiched back .. things take time..

No style is built to last. Mike's style worked as long as it did primarily because he was facing guys who were pissing themselves when they got in the ring with him. He wasn't invulnerable, no man is. The myth of Mike Tyson is that he was unbeatable. James Douglas was a heavyweight with the right physical attributes, the right skills, and for one night, the right heart to beat Mike.

Sorry; but Mike being unstoppable is just beyond impossible to believe. He had flaws. He could have been better than he was; but how good is pure speculation.