Hi, Breadman! Hope your life is good and your family is well. Regarding Benn-Eubank 2, I hear two theories: the first is that Benn did his homework and was rather methodical than relentless in his attack, and the second is that Chris Jr was a shadow of his previous bout self. What is your vision? And what is next for these two guys? Regarding Usyk relinquishing his belt to Wardley: was it a “high risk low reward” situation? Would love to hear your prediction on Wardley-Kabayel. How can Wardley be compared to another “non-boxer champ” Deontay Wilder? A short message to fans. After starting boxing in my 40+, I will never call any fighter whose performance I didn’t like "a bum" or whatever. It is a challenging sport, even at a very amateur level. People who enter the ring to entertain us deserve respect. God bless you for this weekly lesson of boxing and life for us. Sergey, Goa, India, ex-Moscow
Bread’s response: I have used the word “bum” in the past also and I wish I had not. No boxer deserves to be called that word.
It appeared to me that Chris Eubank is having a hard time making 160lbs. On top of that, there was a rehydration clause in effect that doesn’t allow him to rehydrate and replenish fully. He’s also closer to 40 than he is 30. And he was asked to do this, twice. Sometimes a fighter can do something extreme once but to ask them to repeat it, may be unsustainable. It was obviously unsustainable. Eubank looked completely flat.
For the record I don’t get the big celebration. They had to stack the deck against Eubank twice just to get one victory. Getting sucked down in weight is one thing. But also not being allowed to hydrate fully is very tough to overcome. I’m not making excuses for Eubank because I’m sure he was paid well and he knew what he was signing up for. But objectively speaking, that’s stacking the deck at its finest.
Usyk is special. Let’s leave him alone. He’s not scared of anyone. I don’t believe he has any issue fighting Fabio Wardley. Usyk is most likely taking his time, making his next decision and he’s not going to be rushed into anything at this point in his career. He's earned that.
The only fighter Oleksandr Usyk has fought at heavyweight who isn’t British is Chazz Witherspoon. Usyk’s next expected opponent is Fabio Wardley, another British boxer without a prayer. I’m very happy Usyk has established himself as better than everyone in England. As a boxing fan, I expect the heavyweight champion to fight people from across the globe. Do you agree with my position or are you okay with Usyk only fighting British heavyweights?
Bread’s response: Listen, personally I don’t criticize Oleksandr Usyk. I think he’s one of the best fighters ever and would’ve succeeded in any era. Technically you have a point but I think we have to address it in context. The top two heavyweights at the time Usyk entered the division were Fury and Joshua. So he fought them both 4x. Daniel Dubois was on a run, he stopped Joshua. So Usyk fought him 2x. Personally, don’t have an issue with it. The only slight criticism I can say is, I don’t think we needed three rematches. When a fighter is fighting twice a year, three separate rematches holds up the progress of the division. But that’s light.
If there was a top contender that wasn’t from the UK that earned a shot at Usyk and Usyk didn’t fight him, I would agree with you. But there isn’t. Deontay Wilder has seemingly slipped from his status as the best American heavyweight. Jared Anderson lost to a UK heavyweight. And Richard Torrez is good but he may not be ready to fight Usyk. Torrez would be a 15 to 1 underdog if he signed to fight Usyk tomorrow.
I will say that in my opinion Agit Kabayel and Moses Itauma are the most intriguing heavyweights for Usyk to fight. Itauma is from the UK and Kabayel is from Germany. So it’s not about if I agree with you or not. I want you tell me who’s earned a shot at Usyk that’s a viable contender that isn’t from the UK. If you can give me some names that are better than the UK fighters I already stated then you would have made your point… But you didn’t. You gave me a bland criticism without context.
Usyk does NOT duck smoke. He’s a gun. He fights all of his big fights on the road in his opponent’s home territory. I don’t think he would care if he had to go to ANOTHER country to fight a contender.
Hi Bread, ONE Championship fighters must pass a hydration test before weigh-ins, meaning they cannot be dehydrated when weighing in, to prevent dangerous weight cutting practices. Did you know about this? Could this work in boxing?
Bread’s response: I don’t like the idea. No one will tell you this. But 99.9% of fighters are dehydrated at weigh-ins. They cut water out the day of or day before to get off the last few pounds. So even if camp went well, there is a little dehydration at the end of camps before the weigh in. If dehydration was a factor in cancelling fights, there would be no boxing.
However, here are some rules we need in boxing. Weights and hydration should be checked in camp. But the weight % should be adjusted. The limit should be 20% max over their weigh in weight. Not 10%. Newsflash, welterweights don’t walk around camp the entire time 14.7lbs over the 147lb weight limit. If you think welterweights walk around at 161.7lbs you’re sadly mistaken. They get down to that in camp at some point but they don’t walk around at that weight. So give the fighters realistic weight goals. No one should be 20% even starting camp. And hydration and cognizant test should be done throughout camp.
Since we are talking about fighter safety, The IBF should do away with their 10lbs next day in rule. Fighters secretly are scared to fight for the IBF belt because of this but they won’t say it out loud. The rule should be a 10% rehydration max for the next day weigh in. Not 10lbs. Because 10lbs to gain for a fighter who fights at 108lbs is not the same for a fighter who fights at 160lbs. It severely restricts the fighter who is fighting at 160lbs whereas it’s more within realm for the fighter who fights at 108lbs to only gain 10lbs because that’s about 10% of their weigh-in weight. Where as 10% of the 160lb fighter’s weigh-in weight is 16lbs. That’s a huge difference.
I love the IBF by the way. They gave my first fighter Julian Williams a shot at their title. Julian didn’t have a problem with the next day weigh in but most fighters do. And rules should not be for outliers, they should be for the norm. In my humble opinion, things like this should be openly discussed in boxing if our goal is fighter safety. It’s not safe for a fighter to walk around at 185lbs. Cut down to 160lbs for a fight. Then be told they can only weigh 170lbs the next morning when they’re trying to rehydrate and go in the ring at full strength. I know this was slightly off topic. But I don’t believe in implementing rules for safety that aren’t safe. If fighters and their teams told the truth about what weight they walk around, you would understand where I’m going with this.
Hi Breadman, Do you think Jerry Quarry was a good heavyweight who had the misfortune of fighting during an era of all-time great boxers? In other words, might Jerry Quarry have been champion in another time? Thanks,Michael
Bread’s response: Jerry Quarry could really fight. But when a fighter doesn’t breakthrough in their era and become a champion, I don’t always say to myself they would be champion in another era that was weaker. Although that line of thinking may be true and have some relevance, there is something to be said about being at your best when you best is needed and coming through with the performance of a lifetime when you need it.
I feel for fighters like Oba Carr, Ruben Castillo and Rocky Juarez. But as a competitor you have to find a way to come through. I personally believe Quarry is better than fighters like Tommy Morrison and Gerry Cooney, who were often compared to him. I don’t know if he could’ve beaten them head to head because of the size difference but I believe he was better than both. But that doesn’t mean he could’ve been champion in another era. Maybe if Quarry came along in the early 80s, I suspect he could’ve been a WBA champion which seemed to change hands every fight until Mike Tyson came along. And maybe Quarry would’ve had a chance to win the title if he came along in the 1950s before Ali and Liston won the title. Quarry does have a win over Floyd Patterson who was the champion before Ali and Liston. But fighters like Quarry are interesting. Quarry has wins over fighters like Floyd Patterson, Buster Mathis, Mac Foster, Ron Lyle and Earnie Shavers. Those are some solid contenders. But he also has losses to fighters like George Chuvalo, Jimmy Ellis and Eddie Machen. Chuvalo, Ellis and Machen are solid fighters but they aren’t A level fighters.
I give Quarry a break for 5 of his losses. Ali 2x, Frazier 2x and Norton 1x. Ali, Fraizer and Norton are HOF. But losing to Machen, Chuvalo, Ellis and shows a level of inconsistency that comes along with hard luck fighters. So all in all, I will say Quarry had the capabilities to win a world title if he put it together on the right night. But it’s not a sure shot because he lost to multiple fighters who weren’t good enough to win world titles themselves.
Boxing is all about the close and controversial decision, the home cooked meal etc. But when we attempt to introduce objective sources of information like CompuBox, the fans resist, call it fake. They have done this with the new AI judging thing too. This is a basic fault with the sport and also what makes it awesome, but bad to bet on often. You take out the subjectivity, the emotion and the one-eyedness and the thing dies. It is a magnificently faulted thing. Love you man, I follow your tips I make money, I doubt you and I lose! Jeremy in Australia
Bread’s response: Here is the thing Jeremy. The CompuBox and AI analysis are programmed by humans. And wherever humans are involved, there is room for error. AI has recently came out with bad scorecards and assessments. And while I often refer to CompuBox myself, I have seen some CompuBox punch stats that did NOT reflect the fight I was watching. So while I don’t attack AI or CompuBox personally, I do understand why they get questioned.
You also have to realize how fickle fans are. Fans don’t want objectivity. They want their subjective preference to prevail. For example if AI or CompuBox supports or confirms their desire, then they won’t have a problem with it. But if AI or CompuBox says something different than what they want to believe, then they will discredit AI or CompuBox. It’s really just that simple. It’s why I try not to get into boxing arguments unless I’m getting paid for it.
What’s up my man, 3 questions: 1) Your philosophy on rematches, trilogies, etc.- when does it make sense and when does it not? 2) Any thoughts, insights or philosophies into training for Championship rounds? Seems like certain fighters come alive and others fade. Wondering what all affects that. 3) Philosophy vs Business when it comes to matching young undefeated elite fighters (I.e Ortiz vs Ennis, Tank vs Garcia, Haney vs Norman) - what it does for the sport, self belief, vs the risk in career trajectory (up or down) You are the man. Sincerely, Alex S.
Bread’s response: I don’t really have a philosophical theory on rematches. But I will give this a try. Close, competitive or controversial big fights that sold well are good for rematches. And big upsets that screwed up super fights are good for rematches. For example Duran vs Leonard meets the criteria as a close competitive big fight. And Rahman vs Lewis fits the criteria as a big upset that screwed up a superfight.
Training for the championship rounds is about a few things. Having composure is the main thing. You may ask how do you train composure. Well you put a fighter in a position that he’s not comfortable with and you keep at it until he becomes comfortable. Oftentimes a fighter is in physical shape. But he falls apart late because he panics late in fights when things aren’t going his way. I also believe simulating the intensity and pace of the fight in training leads to better real fight performances. It’s extremely difficult to train one way, then expect to fight in a different capacity.
For example, if a fighter is a high-paced fighter who needs to stay on his toes to win a fight trains flat footed at a much slower pace than he fights at, normally they won’t be able to perform at their best under the bright lights.
I also believe in fighting your most dangerous opponents when you’re at your best physically. Obviously you want to get paid a high sum. But over-marinating fights, has killed more fights than anything else. There is a happy medium to find. I can give you examples better than I can tell you a philosophy. Leonard vs Hearns 1 happened at the right time. They were both champions in the same division for about a year and a half. After a couple of defenses they simply fought. It was the biggest fight in history up until that point. Leonard was 25, Hearns was 22. I think now is the right time to make Ennis vs Ortiz. The only part that’s a little killjoy is no full title will be on the line. But Ennis is 28 and Ortiz is 27. Both have been pro over eight years. Both are coming off of big ko victories. If they put it off too much longer the luster can be lost and/or the fans could get turned off.
Crawford vs Spence.... They made great money to fight in 2023 but I think it would’ve been a better fight had they fought circa 2019. I’m not suggesting it was anyone’s fault. But they were both champions together in the same division since 2018.
Ofte times people refer to Mayweather vs Pacquiao as to why marinating works. But they were fortunate in their specific case. Pacquiao was brutally kod in 2012 by Marquez. That’s the type of ko that can end a career and ruin the superfight. Manny moved up to welterweight in 2008. Anytime from 2009-11 would’ve been a great time for Mayweather and Pacquiao to fight. They didn’t fight until 2015. Marinating definitely worked for them but in my opinion their case is an outlier. Waiting six years to fight while you’re already in your 30s is a risky proposition.
Hey Bread, I was talking with a co-worker about Crawford’s next move, and I realized something: Crawford has a chance to be in the conversation for the GOAT. The way I see it, his likeliest next move is to challenge the winner of Alimkhanuly and Lara at middleweight. Assuming he wins that, he'll then own three of the belts at middleweight. From there, he can challenge Carlos Adames to become undisputed. Assuming he wins that and it's his last fight, let's then consider his resume: Former undisputed super middleweight champion; Retired as undisputed middleweight champion; Former undisputed welterweight champion; Former undisputed junior welterweight champion; Former lineal lightweight champion. Throw in being a champion at junior middleweight and we're looking at an undisputed champion in four different divisions during the four belt era, the lineal champion in five different divisions, and a champion of some kind in six different divisions. The only potential mark against him would be the lack of Hall of Fame scalps on his resume (Canelo and maybe Spence, can't think of anyone else), but Crawford never ducked anyone (some will scream Ennis, but I'm not buying it given what he accomplished by moving up), he would never have taken a loss in the scenario I'm laying out, and to date he's never been outboxed or taken a real beating. Given all this, wouldn't Crawford deserve to at least be in the conversation for the GOAT? – Doug
Bread’s response: The Hall of Famer Russell Peltz often tells me to wait until a fighter’s career is over to rate them. I try to listen but it’s hard when you keep getting asked over and over. I know you guys want answers. So let me try my best to listen to Russell and also give you guys what you want.
I am really high on Terence Crawford. I’ve believed he was a Hall of Famer and the best fighter in the world for quite some time now. I also picked him very early to beat Canelo. But there are several people who I respect that are very knowledgeable that don’t rate him as high as I do. I don’t let people sway my opinion but I’m also not close-minded. They simply tell me that Crawford is the real deal but his resume is way too thin to be in a GOAT conversation. They also say that Crawford is preserved at his age because his resume is so thin.
I personally think Crawford’s resume is thin because he was frozen out of big fights. I don’t blame him. But I also don’t give him credit for something he hasn’t done. One sure shot HOF on his resume does hurt him somewhat when compared to the greats who usually have two or more solid HOF wins....
I also don’t believe Crawford ducked Boots. It’s just one of those things where they are at different places in their careers. So as of right now, I’m going to say from my perspective Crawford is not only a HOF but he is an ATG. My only question is what tier is he on? GOAT status is the highest tier you can be on. It’s the place where fighters like Sugar Ray Robinson and Muhammad Ali reside. I would like to see Crawford’s performances vs Janibek or Adames before I say he’s a GOAT. Performance value counts.
I think Janibek and Adames are solid fighters but neither are considered great or HOF worthy just yet. So it’s tough to say if a victory over them would give Crawford GOAT status without seeing the performance first. To be fair to Crawford let’s just see what he does and who he fights before we start doing this. I’m personally not as high on Adames and Janibek as I was Canelo. Canelo is a legit great fighter. I don’t know if either of them are great fighters just yet where a victory over them concretes a certain status.
God bless Bread, Hope the Good Lord is blessing you and your beautiful family. I watched the Ortiz vs Lubin fight this weekend with much interest due to Boots being at the Arena to watch the fight. Boots did the expected in calling for the fight. But I must say I don't believe this fight is happening anytime soon. I do believe Boots really wants this fight next, but Mr. Ortiz does not seem serious about facing him next. Ortiz seems to want an easier fight with Errol Spence next. Even Oscar is talking nonsense as usual. I must admit this fight would be more interesting if they both had a title at Jr. Middleweight. Meanwhile Top Rank has done a great job promoting Xander Zayas. He already is the youngest champion in boxing and he soon will be a multi-division belt holder after he beats Abas Baraou. Most boxing fans believe he is the weakest champ at Jr. Middleweight, but the kid is improving and has great defense a la Shakur Stevenson. Your thoughts?
Bread’s response: I agree with you about Boots vs Ortiz. People complained that Boots didn’t call anyone out or act like he wants to fight big fights. So he went to Ortiz vs Lubin, got in the ring and called Ortiz out in front of his hometown. He also got his promoter to work out a deal. Still no fight agreed to as of yet...It’s pretty obvious at this specific time Ortiz’s team is looking in another direction.
I also agree with you that Boots vs Ortiz should be for a full title. But neither has a full title. And neither will have one within the next six months because all of the champions are busy. The fight will be over cooked if they don’t fight in 2026.
Top Rank and Team Zayas are doing an excellent job with Xander Zayas. Zayas is considered maybe a top 7 or 8 fighter in the division. Yet he’s going to be the favorite to have two titles in boxing’s best division. Getting Abbass to come to Puerto Rico to fight was a big time move. Interesting enough. Boots is the WBA interim champion. I wonder if the WBA is willing to make Boots, Xander’s mandatory if he wins.
Here is where we disagree. Xander is definitely improving but you’re comparing his defense to Shakur Stevenson’s. Xander is using his legs and he looked good in his last fight. But you’re disrespecting Shakur and not being fair to Xander. Shakur may be the best defensive fighter in boxing and Xander just hit the championship level. Let the young man develop and let’s see where he goes before you start doing that. It’s unnecessary pressure and it’s pointless.
I saw your interview about not training Caleb anymore. That had to be a tough decision because he’s a star fighter and I assume he’s making more money than the rest of your current fighters. Props to you for standing your ground. I could tell after a few rounds that something was wrong with him, and I respect you for not telling what happened. But it was obviously something really off with him. It really sucks because you guys were doing so good together. He looked to be improving every fight until the last one. My question to you is do you think he gets it together and beats Jermall Charlo or is this the end for him? And if Charlo asked you to help out in camp would you do it?
Bread’s response: I don’t believe that Plant vs Charlo has been signed yet. So I don’t want to make a concrete prediction on a fight that hasn’t been signed, especially considering I used to train Plant. But this is my job, so I will give some preliminary thoughts.
I think it’s a great logical match up where both have advantages. I believe Caleb is the more agile athlete. I believe Caleb has an advantage in handspeed and a big advantage in foot speed. Caleb has super fast feet. I also believe Caleb is the better technical fighter on the inside if he applies that part of his game. Caleb has a long reach on paper but I think it's because of back. His arms aren't super long but it works for him on the inside. He has a really good short hook and he throws nice uppercuts when he's comfortable inside. Jermall likes to get extension on his power.
Although Jermall used to be a Junior Middleweight, I think he’s the more physical fighter and he seems to be physically more imposing if not outright stronger. Jermall also has not been down as a pro and has shown a great chin. Jermall’s chin allows him to show determination to press on in tough fights where he’s been outboxed for a few rounds which could be a factor in this fight if Caleb is outboxing him early.
I don’t know who the puncher is in the fight. Because I believe the puncher in a fight is the fighter who can take his opponent’s punches the best. So that remains to be seen. Jermall has the momentum going into this fight if it does happen. For obvious reasons. We just saw Caleb lose to a Resendiz in what was supposed to be a tune up. But Caleb has responded well in the past after coming off of losses. When Caleb lost to Canelo, he followed that fight with his best career ko vs Anthony Dirrell. And when Caleb lost to Benavidez, he followed that fight with his best career in-fight adjustment vs Trevor McCumby. So if history tells us anything, it’s that Caleb will perform at a higher level than he did vs Resendiz. Let’s see what happens.
I just heard that Terence Crawford accepted the Jake Paul fight but Paul went with Anthony Joshua. Did I miss something or did Paul pick a 6’6 250lbs ko artist over a 5’8 168lb fighter? Is Paul vs Joshua a real fight? I ask because I know Crawford is better than Joshua pound for pound but this is not a pound for pound make pretend fight. This is a real fight. I’m confused Bread, tell me I’m not crazy.
Bread’s response: If I were Paul, I would pick Joshua over Bud too. Here is why. If Paul loses to Joshua he can always say, he gave up 50lbs to an ex-heavyweight champion. But if he loses to Crawford, he would have the size advantages. So he wouldn’t be able to use that excuse. Crawford would also most likely stop Paul late in a brutal beating and Paul’s career can’t take that type of hit because of the casuals who criticize.
On top of that, AJ is a very good fighter but we have seen him show vulnerability in several areas; punch resistance, confidence and stamina. Crawford is more than a good fighter. He’s an all-time great fighter in my opinion, who’s mean as hell and has not shown any of the vulnerabilities that Joshua has shown.
I do find it interesting that fighters always seem to want to fight AJ. Even Andre Ward, who hasn’t fought in eight years, publicly said he would fight AJ. It’s something that people in boxing see in AJ that gives them confidence they can beat him, even though he’s a very capable fighter.
Last but not least boxers have egos. The world saw Andy Ruiz stop AJ brutally. I’m going to assume in Jake Paul’s mind, he says to himself, “If Ruiz can do that to him, I can.”
Hi Breadman, I pray God is blessing and continues to bless you, your family and the fans of your mailbag and their families. Calzaghe and Froch are right about Canelo. I’m not diminishing what Crawford did because it was historic and impressive, but I never got the Canelo hype. I have said this to you and others way before his loss to Crawford. Too many debatable wins and the Benavidez duck is going to haunt him forever unless he fights him now. Plus, he tested positive for PEDs and that is not going to be forgotten either. His performances vs. Trout, Cotto, Triple G, Lara were not impressive at all. I don’t look at him like I look at the great Hispanic fighters from the past like Chavez, Sanchez, Lopez, Duran, Arguello, and others. Nor do I think he holds a candle to Jones, Toney, Hopkins, Hagle , Hearns, Ward, Calzaghe, and those types of guys at super middleweight. He is more a product of matchmaking and marketing.. Great fighters win decisively and Canelo to me represents great marketing and hype more than great performance. I would have felt this way even if he had beaten Crawford. Crawford is a great fighter, and Canelo is a good fighter. We all know Crawford had superior skills but unlike you, we didn’t know if he would retain the skills and endurance if he moved up in weight. You had supreme confidence Crawford would bring his skills up in weight and you were right. Glad to see Joshua will be fighting Paul instead of Tank. Hopefully, if the fight is legit, Joshua will end this Jake Paul nonsense once and for all. Keep up the great work with the mailbags, they are by far the best publication in boxing right now and it is not even close. Love the work you are doing at Millcity Boxing. You’re doing your thing brother and you are doing it well. Peter Allen
Bread’s response: Thanks but for the record I don’t work with or for Millcity Boxing. I just do interviews with them from time to time.
I disagree about Canelo. I don’t believe he’s a tier 1 ATG fighter. But he’s better than just a “good” fighter in my opinion. He is the product of favorable matchmaking. But he didn’t have to fight Lara and Mayweather. Those are some ridiculously tough fights for his style and he took the fights as a young man. I’m not saying who’s better or worse. But in terms of greatness Canelo stands near fighters like Cotto, Oscar and Mosley. He’s not where fighters like Pacquiao, Mayweather and Jones are. It’s very simple in my opinion. All greatness is not the same. There are tiers.
Canelo unified at 154lbs , defended his title six times. Then won it again later in his career. He also unified at 160lbs. He became undisputed at 168 and defended that belt nine times. And he won a real title at 175lbs. Only 3 men in history have won titles from 154-175. Those three men are Tommy Hearns, Ray Leonard and Canelo Alvarez. Even with the duck of Benavidez we have to acknowledge Canelo as a great fighter.
What do you think of the antics of Team Devin Haney and Team Brian Norman? The dads seem to be in character but I remember them talking about each other’s mothers, so that has to be real. Haney seems to have nervous energy and Norman seems to be very calm. But I don’t know what to make of it all. Thoughts?
Bread’s response: I think both of the dads Norman and Haney are having fun. I don’t think it was staged when they talked about each other’s mothers. But I think at this point they’re having fun. The sons are acting like themselves. Devin is more animated than Norman Jr..... I don’t over analyze these things. However, I do like how both fighters moved at their media workout.
You can see Brian Norman has been working on his speed with his movements. That’s a good thing but he can’t try to be too fast during the fight. The body has different energy systems and trying to be fast can be harmful if not applied right. My kids run track. And their best times and races are when their speed is relaxed and smooth. Not hard and rigid. Norman looked smooth in his warm up, I’m curious to see if it will carry over to the fight. Haney looked nice and smooth. Nothing caught me off guard but I will say I like the maturity that Brian Norman Jr has shown throughout. He will need it in this match up.
What are your thoughts on Stephen A. Smith overall? His boxing acumen, his critics and his overall impact on sports?
Bread’s response: Stephen A. Smith worked here in Philly for many years so I’m familiar with him. He seems like a super cool dude. I saw him once at the airport and he nodded his head and said what’s up to me. We didn’t talk but he was down to earth enough to speak.
I would consider him an expert on basketball. Very knowledgeable on football. And solid on boxing but you can see that boxing is not his expertise. It’s nothing wrong with that. I think Smith is doing an excellent job with his various platforms. He has taken media sports personalities to the next level. He's a GOAT in that space. I don’t know him personally so it’s hard to comment on his criticism. At times it seems as though he’s being wrongly attacked. And at times the criticism seems warranted. You have to give me specific incidents so I can talk about it in context.
Overall, I like Stephen A. Smith. I think he’s the truth and I love his journey of where he came from to where he is now. I would like to one day sit down and rap with the brother. He’s good for the game. My only issue with him is he picked against the Eagles this weekend against the Cowboys. But other than that, he’s the man.
Send questions and comments to dabreadman25@hotmail.com
