|12-23-2011, 08:12 PM||#1|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 20,197,081.71
Ring magazine readers vote pacquiao-marquez the "robbery of the year" for 2011
There were worse decisions than Manny Pacquiao’s majority decision victory over Juan Manuel Marquez in 2011, but none were as high-profile as their third bout.
The result of Pacquiao-Marquez III was seen as the “Robbery of the Year” by 43 percent of the fans who voted in this year’s ******.com readers’ choice year-end award poll. Other bad decisions of 2011 that received votes included Paul Williams-Erislandy Lara (32.1 percent), Robert Helenius-Dereck Chisora (9.8), Devon Alexander-Lucas Matthysse (8.9) and Felix Sturm-Matthew Macklin (6.3).
However, few (if any) controversial verdicts evoked the outrage that the Marquez’s heart-breaking loss did.
The impassioned outcry was not surprising. Pacquiao and Marquez both have diehard national followings and their rivaly is among the sport’s most heated of the past 20 years.
Marquez clearly outclassed Pacquiao when they first fought as featherweights in 2004, but he had to settle for a split-draw because the explosive Filipino scored three first-round knockdowns.
Had Pacquiao not scored a third-round knockdown in their hotly contested rematch, fought for Marquez’s 130-pound title in 2008, they would have battled to another draw. Instead, Pacquiao won a split decision.
Marquez (53-6-1, 39 knockouts) not only avoided being knocked down in their third match on Nov. 12 in Las Vegas, the 38-year-old veteran fought more effectively than he did in their two previous bouts.
His masterful exhibition of aggressive counter punching shocked and awed most observers, but it wasn’t enough to sway the official judges, who scored the bout 116-112, 115-113 and 114-114 for Pacquiao (54-3-2, 38 KOs), obviously crediting the huge favorite’s greater activity.
Press row disagreed with the official verdict. In a poll of 20 ringside boxing writers conducted by Golden Boy Promotions publicist Bill Caplan, 12 thought that Marquez won the bout, seven scored it a draw, while only one had it for Pacquiao (by one point).
Retired veteran judge Chuck Giampa, who scored the bout 116-112 for Marquez, stated that “Marquez controlled the majority of rounds with effective aggression AND ring generalship,” in his You Be the Judge column in the February issue of THE RING.
“I believe (Harold) Lederman (HBO’s unofficial judge commentator who scored the bout 116-112 for Pacquiao) and the three judges did not give Marquez enough credit for his effecive counter punching. As per the rules, a fighter should be given credit for effective aggression whether moving forward, backward, sideways, against the ropes or counter punching.”
That did not happen on Nov. 12 in the eyes of most fans, many of whom counted Marquez out, believing that the reigning RING lightweight champ would not be effective fighting at the 144-pound catchweight for the third bout.
However, although Marquez is officially 0-1-2 against Pacquiao, the Mexican legend scored a couple moral victories over his fellow hall-of-fame bound rival with his unexpected strong showing.
Pacquiao was dropped from the No. 1 spot on the pound-for-pound rankings of both Yahoo! Sports and ESPN.com and replaced by Floyd Mayweather, who scored a one-sided decision over Marquez in 2009.
And while Pacquiao retained his WBO welterweight title on Nov. 12, he lost something that night that he carried into every bout that he won since his rematch with Marquez. The moment the decision was announced, Pacquiao was no longer the senitmental favorite among general fans.
That status clearly belonged to Marquez.
by Doug Fischer
Dec 23rd, 2011
|12-23-2011, 08:25 PM||#3|
The Money Team
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quoted: 13 Post(s)Rep Power: 30
Total Points: 7,871,582,374,572,673.00
Didn't know you could vote on that, I got about 100+ people at work that agree it was a robbery. Gonna check it out and pass the link around.
|12-23-2011, 08:27 PM||#4|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quoted: 808 Post(s)Rep Power: 14
Total Points: 55,739,094,102,411.85
|12-23-2011, 08:28 PM||#5|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ray's Boom Boom Room
Quoted: 35 Post(s)Rep Power: 31
Total Points: 13,998,614,257,001.66
It wasn't the robbery of the year. It was such a big fight. That's the only reason it was picked.
|12-23-2011, 08:28 PM||#6|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bronx, New York
Quoted: 659 Post(s)Rep Power: 86
Total Points: 1,000,800,638,140,701,184.00
That decision was horrible, definitely a robbery, unless one doesn't know how to score. What made it more tasteless and left many disgusted was Pacquiao's post fight comments. Not the worst robbery but it stood out the most.
|12-23-2011, 08:30 PM||#8|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 13,066,160,183,318,970.00
well that's great.
was it as bad as Lara- Williams? no
was it more significant? definitely
inb4 the same alts come in here spamming the post fight faces and how they had the fight 116-112 for Paquiao
|12-23-2011, 08:32 PM||#9|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Quoted: 1590 Post(s)Rep Power: 92
Total Points: 4,481,437,848,974,518,272.00
It wasn't the worst decision, although up there IMO, but it was certainly the most high profile, when everyone was tuned in.
|12-23-2011, 08:34 PM||#10|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quoted: 965 Post(s)Rep Power: 136
Total Points: 17,213,730,675,513,068.00
|Share This With Friends|
|"robbery, 2011, magazine, pacquiao-marquez, readers, ring, vote, year"|