I know that every single p4p list that we may find around the internet or any boxing board/forum etc etc is going to be different, cos its only represents the oppionion of somebody else.
BUT...
Shouldnt that list have at least a minimum requirement? for me to be in the p4p list.. u need at least to be a 2 division champion. I know theres a lot "catch weight" fights out there that are as significant or bigger than any other fight... but i think it would be nice.. if at least we could have some ..
basic standard measure to figure out the most "correct" list.
With that being said..
I dont think that any fighter who only have one belt @ one division should be consider to be in the p4p list.
Do you agree?
BUT...
Shouldnt that list have at least a minimum requirement? for me to be in the p4p list.. u need at least to be a 2 division champion. I know theres a lot "catch weight" fights out there that are as significant or bigger than any other fight... but i think it would be nice.. if at least we could have some ..
basic standard measure to figure out the most "correct" list.
With that being said..
I dont think that any fighter who only have one belt @ one division should be consider to be in the p4p list.
Do you agree?
Comment