Which Quintana-Williams fight was more of a "Fluke"

**El Dominicano** · 02-19-2009, 02:50 PM

I don't know and I don't think that is important. All I know is, Paul avenged his lose with a 1st round K.O. Win is a win and a fluke ain't an excuse

**mellow_mood** · 02-19-2009, 02:50 PM

i kind of agree with you.. about the 2nd one..

but im gonna say..

none of them.... williams in their 2nd fight proves that.. he definitly can ****... if he place well his punches... and

quintana prove in their first.. that he have good boxing skills and can use them for 12 rounds..

**Ch@mpBox@PR** · 02-19-2009, 02:50 PM

Originally posted by Dub_C

OK..I keep seeing Paul Williams fans claiming the first fight against Quintana was a "fluke" and showed his true Potential in the rematch!..but I really don't understand this logic..how can you call a 12 round schooling a fluke?..
Quintana was moving, circling and popping Williams ALL NIGHT!..he was ROCKING Williams with that looping left hand ALL NIGHT!..

So Quintana wasn't suppose to win that fight..and the rematch was almost inevitable!..and Quintana I believe steps in a lil too confident and felt he could stand and trade this time around and Williams catches him clean in the first Round and puts him away..

I think In my opinion of course that the second fight was the showcase of a real "fluke" as it was more of Quintana's ****iness/Williams determination that clashed that night..

what do you guys think?...

A 1 round Ko is more of a fluke than a 12 round schooling, specially when your comming from scholing the same guy that KOs you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

**120** · 02-19-2009, 02:51 PM

lets get a third fight on to see...oh wait, Williams wants no part of that

**El Dominicano** · 02-19-2009, 02:51 PM

By the way, you should have added none as an option

**Welter_Skelter** · 02-19-2009, 02:51 PM

Any 1st round KO is a bit of a fluke at this level..

A 3rd fight is needed to prove which fight was the fluke, really

**savorduhflavor** · 02-19-2009, 02:52 PM

Obviously the 2nd. It wasn't a fluke in terms of Williams winning, but the fashion in which he won was a fluke.

Losing after 12 rounds is more convincing than losing after getting caught in the first round.

However, I think Williams would beat Quintana again if they fought. Quintana is very good, and very underrated, but I think Williams has improved.

However, to diminish Quintana's win over Williams saying **** like "oh it was a fluke" or "Williams had an off night" I think is grossly unfair to Quintana.

**El Dominicano** · 02-19-2009, 02:52 PM

Originally posted by mellow_mood

i kind of agree with you.. about the 2nd one..

but im gonna say..

none of them.... williams in their 2nd fight proves that.. he definitly can ****... if he place well his punches... and

quintana prove in their first.. that he have good boxing skills and can use them for 12 rounds..

Exactly, man

**mellow_mood** · 02-19-2009, 02:55 PM

Originally posted by El Dominicano

By the way, you should have added none as an option

co-sign.!!!

but.. like i say.. if i had to pick one...

the 2nd one.

Which Quintana-Williams fight was more of a "Fluke"