He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....Lefty
Why isn't nate Campbell making a bigger stink?
Collapse
-
Whats the point though?He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....Lefty
It aint like Hoya or anyone will listen...
Plus everyone else is kicking up a stink Nate dont have to..
Its obvious how peeps feel about it....Last edited by The Gully Gad; 09-03-2008, 11:24 AM. -
Comment
-
Comment
-
why vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.He hold three of the 4 belts and the other belt is currently held by PACMAN....Why isn't he making a bigger stink about the fight between PACMAN and DLH? I truely think the boxing world should cry out against these Chamos moving up in weight to fight bigger oppoenents for money if they have belts. In my book they should have to vacate the belt before moving up to fight a bigger opponent. Then have a title elimination mtach or tourney in that divivsion and give some of these younger guys and more hungry guys an opportunity to make some money nad entertain the public.....LeftyComment
-
i think you should be limited to one fight at a different weight and then have to decide to defend your belt again, so pac should have to put his lightweight belts on the line after dlh or give them up, as much as i would like to see hatton - paq it wouldnt be fair for him to keep his lightweight belts unless he would defend them after dlh if that makes any sensewhy vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.
basically you can venture to a different weight but if you decide to take multiple fights at that weight you have to make the move more permanentComment
-
have PACMAN fluctuate between 130 and 147 go up 17 and down 17 can't be too healthy...I can see this happening from 140 to 147 or 147 to 154 but two weight classes back and forth like I sad can't be too healthy.....Leftywhy vacate the belt? as long as he immediately goes back down and defends his belt I have no problem with it. I say fighters should even be allowed to hold belts in multiple weight divisions at the same time as long as they defend each of those belts on a regular basis. henry armstrong held belts in 4 different weight classes at the same time.Comment
-
Guzman will win and then he will call out Pac, but no one would care because they will all be in love with the idea of the Pac-DLH fight.
WAR GUZMAN!!Comment
Comment