I asked a observational question. A serial killer has a certain M.O. Like killing women for the sexual pleasure of it. Or men, I.E. Jeffrey Dahmer.
So does Wlad got it out for the big, undefeated men of the division?
I don't think he targets them specifically. He's fought smaller guys, but with the division being as sof as it is maybe he thinks it looks better to beat a bigger undefeated guy.
He's fought everyone willing to fight him. If you have to pick nobodies, might as well pick nobodies fighting a description of fighters you're criticized for not fighting.
I don't think he targets them specifically. He's fought smaller guys, but with the division being as sof as it is maybe he thinks it looks better to beat a bigger undefeated guy.
We'll see. It just stood out to me, browsing through his boxrec.
If Povetkin is up next, that's a third undefeated guy in a row. I know I'd be motivated to give any undefeated guy his first loss.
We'll see. It just stood out to me, browsing through his boxrec.
If Povetkin is up next, that's a third undefeated guy in a row. I know I'd be motivated to give any undefeated guy his first loss.
Seriously, who cares if they are undefeated? It says a helluva lot more about a fighter who's lost at the top and come back to fight at the top than someone who continuously win at the lowest level.
Povetkin is not undefeated, Huck already handed his ass to him.
Seriously, who cares if they are undefeated? It says a helluva lot more about a fighter who's lost at the top and come back to fight at the top than someone who continuously win at the lowest level.
Povetkin is not undefeated, Huck already handed his ass to him.
So facing Povetkin is not on your radar? Just exactly who is it that he is not facing, as per your other thread statement that I responded to earlier.
Comment