Why didn't Wlad avenge his loss to Sanders?

[yoz]

Curious, that's all.

[Jam Jars]

He got destroyed there was no need for a rematch.

[yoz]

He got destroyed there was no need for a rematch.

He rematched Brewster; plus Vitali fought Sanders in a one-sided fight.

Did Sanders simply have Wlad's no.?

[Jam Jars]

He rematched Brewster; plus Vitali fought Sanders in a one-sided fight.

Did Sanders simply have Wlad's no.?

Honestly i believe that they knew Sanders would always be a risky fight and a rematch wasn't worth the risk. Some of the shots Sanders caught Vitali with in the first couple of rounds would have dropped Wlad again.

[demonlight]

He did.

















He shot him.

















Too soon? Sorry, had to.

[Mato o Muero]

Because he woulda got knocked the fug out again

[The Ban Stick]

He did

He shot him.



Too soon? Sorry, had to.

Sorry, had to ban you. Too soon?

[oscar_angels091]

He did.

















He shot him.

















Too soon? Sorry, had to.

what a b i t c h

[The Ban Stick]

Curious, that's all.

Wondering why you think anyone here would even know that? Why are you asking a bunch of people on a forum who can't answer it?

[ModernTalking]

Sugar Wald Klitschko want none of Sanders after that beat down.