Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao has a weak resume at 147. Cotto and others have been more impressive

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pacquiao has a weak resume at 147. Cotto and others have been more impressive

    Correct me if I'm wrong but Pac has a fairly weak resume at welterweight relative to ATG welterweights. Mayweather is also questionable as an ATG at this weight. Overall, Pac is legendary, but this perception of him as an unprecedented welterweight is stupid. Please tell me if I'm wrong.

  • #2
    he beat Cotto, Margarito, Mosley and Clottey.


    all were top 5 WW's when he fought them.



    so suck a nut and go away

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Rassclot View Post
      he beat Cotto, Margarito, Mosley and Clottey.


      all were top 5 WW's when he fought them.



      so suck a nut and go away
      Top welterweights to pacamaniacs. Most of those rankings are bull**** and everyone knows it, at least in those instances. Margarito, Mosley, and Clottey? I'll give him a weight drained, past-his-prime Cotto and nothing more.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ablindwatchmakr View Post
        Correct me if I'm wrong but Pac has a fairly weak resume at welterweight relative to ATG welterweights. Mayweather is also questionable as an ATG at this weight. Overall, Pac is legendary, but this perception of him as an unprecedented welterweight is stupid. Please tell me if I'm wrong.
        who said Pac or Floyd were ATG WW's? :laugh:

        Comment


        • #5
          He's only had about 4 fights at WW, the guys Floyd wouldn't fight. He resume at 147 is good for how short it is, and it puts Floyds to shame who was a WW for what, 3-4 years before Manny? Just sad.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Jack Napier View Post
            who said Pac or Floyd were ATG WW's? :laugh:
            I hear people saying this crap all the time, or implying it with their other statements. One guy in a Cotto thread said he thinks Pacquiao's accomplishments are much better at welterweight than either Cotto or Margarito. I wan't someone to try proving it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
              He's only had about 4 fights at WW, the guys Floyd wouldn't fight. He resume at 147 is good for how short it is, and it puts Floyds to shame who was a WW for what, 3-4 years before Manny? Just sad.
              I personally think Floyd is better than Manny, But you could make an argument for Pac's resume at welterweight being better...I don't know.

              Comment


              • #8
                Another dumb post.
                Who else is there to fight at welterweight that Pacman hasn't fought?
                Hercules?

                Comment


                • #9
                  atg naw.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ablindwatchmakr View Post
                    Correct me if I'm wrong but Pac has a fairly weak resume at welterweight relative to ATG welterweights. Mayweather is also questionable as an ATG at this weight. Overall, Pac is legendary, but this perception of him as an unprecedented welterweight is stupid. Please tell me if I'm wrong.
                    atg as in top10 welterweight of all time? Not even close. Neither is Floyd imo.

                    I mean just look at the guys who fought at the weight, and could be considered. Robinson, Leonard, Hearns, Gavilan, Armstrong etc etc... It's one of the richest weights of all time.

                    Besides Pacquiao shouldn't be ranked at welterweight. It's not "his" weightclass.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP