Pacquiao has a weak resume at 147. Cotto and others have been more impressive

**Rassclot** · 07-30-2011, 01:07 AM

he beat Cotto, Margarito, Mosley and Clottey.

all were top 5 WW's when he fought them.

so suck a nut and go away

**ablindwatchmakr** · 07-30-2011, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by Rassclot

he beat Cotto, Margarito, Mosley and Clottey.

all were top 5 WW's when he fought them.

so suck a nut and go away

Top welterweights to pacamaniacs. Most of those rankings are bull**** and everyone knows it, at least in those instances. Margarito, Mosley, and Clottey? I'll give him a weight drained, past-his-prime Cotto and nothing more.

**Jack Napier** · 07-30-2011, 01:13 AM

Originally posted by ablindwatchmakr

Correct me if I'm wrong but Pac has a fairly weak resume at welterweight relative to ATG welterweights. Mayweather is also questionable as an ATG at this weight. Overall, Pac is legendary, but this perception of him as an unprecedented welterweight is ******. Please tell me if I'm wrong.

who said Pac or Floyd were ATG WW's? :laugh:

**Beater_of_ass** · 07-30-2011, 01:17 AM

He's only had about 4 fights at WW, the guys Floyd wouldn't fight. He resume at 147 is good for how short it is, and it puts Floyds to shame who was a WW for what, 3-4 years before Manny? Just sad.

**ablindwatchmakr** · 07-30-2011, 01:17 AM

Originally posted by Jack Napier

who said Pac or Floyd were ATG WW's? :laugh:

I hear people saying this crap all the time, or implying it with their other statements. One guy in a Cotto thread said he thinks Pacquiao's accomplishments are much better at welterweight than either Cotto or Margarito. I wan't someone to try proving it.

**ablindwatchmakr** · 07-30-2011, 01:19 AM

Originally posted by Beater_of_ass

He's only had about 4 fights at WW, the guys Floyd wouldn't fight. He resume at 147 is good for how short it is, and it puts Floyds to shame who was a WW for what, 3-4 years before Manny? Just sad.

I personally think Floyd is better than Manny, But you could make an argument for Pac's resume at welterweight being better...I don't know.

**neoz** · 07-30-2011, 01:20 AM

Another dumb post.
Who else is there to fight at welterweight that Pacman hasn't fought?
Hercules?

**Canelo Phresh** · 07-30-2011, 01:20 AM

atg naw.....

**Barry Halls** · 07-30-2011, 01:33 AM

Originally posted by ablindwatchmakr

Correct me if I'm wrong but Pac has a fairly weak resume at welterweight relative to ATG welterweights. Mayweather is also questionable as an ATG at this weight. Overall, Pac is legendary, but this perception of him as an unprecedented welterweight is ******. Please tell me if I'm wrong.

atg as in top10 welterweight of all time? Not even close. Neither is Floyd imo.

I mean just look at the guys who fought at the weight, and could be considered. Robinson, Leonard, Hearns, Gavilan, Armstrong etc etc... It's one of the richest weights of all time.

Besides Pacquiao shouldn't be ranked at welterweight. It's not "his" weightclass.

Pacquiao has a weak resume at 147. Cotto and others have been more impressive