Originally posted by hougigo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WBA are ridiculous! Look at their reason for super champions!
Collapse
-
-
More champions means more sanctioning fees. They don't care how it looks to hardcore boxing fans as long as they can keep selling it to the casual fans and keep stuffing their pockets. It's become more than a disgrace, its an outright joke.
Comment
-
WBA "Super" champion is quite easy to explain. You become a "Super" champion if you've made 5 or more successful defenses of the WBA "Regular" belt, you've won a belt in the same weight class from a different organization body like the IBF, WBC or WBO or you're clearly a superstar fighter or one on the rise like Floyd Mayweather.
I personally don't mind it, I can figure it out quite easily and I don't mind multiple alphabet belts. It's easy to know who is the IBF, WBA, WBC or WBO champion, any other belts like the IBO or NABO, I just don't follow or care.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kombayn View PostWBA "Super" champion is quite easy to explain. You become a "Super" champion if you've made 5 or more successful defenses of the WBA "Regular" belt, you've won a belt in the same weight class from a different organization body like the IBF, WBC or WBO or you're clearly a superstar fighter or one on the rise like Floyd Mayweather.
I personally don't mind it, I can figure it out quite easily and I don't mind multiple alphabet belts. It's easy to know who is the IBF, WBA, WBC or WBO champion, any other belts like the IBO or NABO, I just don't follow or care.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kombayn View PostWBA "Super" champion is quite easy to explain. You become a "Super" champion if you've made 5 or more successful defenses of the WBA "Regular" belt, you've won a belt in the same weight class from a different organization body like the IBF, WBC or WBO or you're clearly a superstar fighter or one on the rise like Floyd Mayweather.
I personally don't mind it, I can figure it out quite easily and I don't mind multiple alphabet belts. It's easy to know who is the IBF, WBA, WBC or WBO champion, any other belts like the IBO or NABO, I just don't follow or care.
I wouldn't care too much if promoters, networks and hall of fames did not recognise belts as world championships. Writers should be using terms like "WBA champion" or "WBA titleholder" instead of "WBA World Champion" or "World Champion".
The WBA's idea is that having a regular champion helps the strained unification process given current boxing politics (as well as the additional sanctioning fees, of course). Sanctioning bodies need to resume a long-past system of using unified mandatories for unified champions, then the mandatory system isn't as clogged as it is now. Eliminators between IBF/WBA/WBC no.1 for the unified champion...etc.
I still think the WBC are 1000000x worse and more corrupt than the WBA will ever be.
Comment
-
WBC is worse for sure... I mean Pac loses to Bradley, gets put to sleep by Marquez, fights a career light weight 2 fights removed from the junior welter class coming off a damn loss in his 1st welter fight, Pac was nowhere near the top of their rankings yet beating Rios made him the mandatory to the WBC title Mayweather holds... lol such garbage just like Pac fighting a non ranked Margacheato @ 150lb catchweight for a WBC **** diamond 154lb title and he wasn't ranked @ 154 either. Then the whole if you are a Mexican with a following like Chavez Jr. or Canelo holding a WBC belt hostage or given a belt type of ****. The WBA is becoming just as **** as the WBC. How did Floyd beat Cotto for a belt then Cotto fought Trout for a WBA belt after he lost it to Floyd. These organizations are only about money and have no integrity. Also **** like Vitali being champ for forever without defending his belt...
Comment
Comment