Civil war is raging in Iraq right now

[Money_May]

These fuckers are brutal. They make Al Qaeda look like a high school platoon.

Seriously, the army fled and left behind all their weapons. Now this group has advanced weapons at their disposal. It's only a matter of time before they gain control.

[hayZ]

Explain to me how a lightly armed force of 800 beats 30,000 well armed troops? Insane.

How can a force of 2000-3000 be taking on a country like Iraq? It's crazy, why aren't they all fighting Bashar?

[Mooshashi]

Sunni have been killing Shia since the weekend after Mohammedan died. They are the enemies of Western Civilization. The more they kill each other, the better it is for us. Sell them all the weapons they want...give them all the bullets they want. It's all good.

[Ten Draw]

These fuckers are brutal. They make Al Qaeda look like a high school platoon.

Seriously, the army fled and left behind all their weapons. Now this group has advanced weapons at their disposal. It's only a matter of time before they gain control.

They won't gain control, they will be stopped by a combination of the Kurds, Iran and Shia milita, perhaps if they struggle the US will bomb the **** out of the whole country again. 3 War ships are now in the Gulf ready and waiting, one being a Nimmitz carrier which could practically flatten most small countries on it's own. But ISIS will take some stopping they're not going to retreat or surrender without some serious hurt put on them.

All things point to the break of Iraq regardless.

[DreamMerchant12]

Sunni vs Shi'a, Muslim vs Muslim. The religion of peace in action.

But but but... they not true Muslims doe

[Sugar Adam Ali]

please expand (be specific)

Well I won't get into too much, but there is huge profits in war, and for the people that loan said money for war..

Some wars are legit, but others are manufactured for the benefit of others..

Once 9/11 happened, then an afghan war with Taliban was legit, but Iraq had no role in it at all, and every excuse bush, Cheney, and congress gave has turned out to be wrong at the very least or just a downright lie at the worst.

I'm going off on a tangent but bear with me..
The major players in the world ie USA, Europe want to control things or at least make things across the world more to their liking.. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but they act like the bossy aunt or grandma telling everyone what to do, instead of letting people figure it out for themselves. Same can be said about Muslim extremists, they want the world to be a certain way which is the polar opposite of western civilization.
To control countries, the western "elites" use political parties and central banks as the main ways to control society.. That's why we have political parties funded by the super rich, if you don't tote the party line you don't get elected and will never be given credabilty in the mainstream media. Doesn't matter if your left or right winger, follow the money and it all gets traced back to the elite..
Take for example the occupy Wall Street movement, that was nothing more than people answering ads on craigslist for money to protest.. It wasn't a true grassroots movement but a manufactured one, and yes there was probably some honest people that participated once it got going but that was a small percent.

In regards to Iraq, the powers that be saw an opening in public opinion and went for it.. There was no legit reason to invade Iraq at the time except for it was a perfect time to install pro-western themes..

In the year 2000 there was only a few countries without a central bank affiliated with the IMF. Those countries were Iraq, Iran, Korea, Sudan, Syria, Afghanistan and now most of those countries have been invaded and have central banking links..

To the average person like me or you, this stuff doesn't really effect us too much, but to the people that actually live in these places, it impacts their entire life..

There is a long list of events/evidence of ruling parties doing what's best for them and not actually tending to the needs of the people they are suppose to represent..

[takingaim]

Well I won't get into too much, but there is huge profits in war, and for the people that loan said money for war..

How huge? Because the war in Iraq cost the USA between $1.5 - 2 trillion.

It's total nonsense wars are started to make profit. Wars are extremely expensive.

Some wars are legit, but others are manufactured for the benefit of others..

Once 9/11 happened, then an afghan war with Taliban was legit, but Iraq had no role in it at all, and every excuse bush, Cheney, and congress gave has turned out to be wrong at the very least or just a downright lie at the worst.

I'm going off on a tangent but bear with me..
The major players in the world ie USA, Europe want to control things or at least make things across the world more to their liking.. Not that there is anything wrong with that, but they act like the bossy aunt or grandma telling everyone what to do, instead of letting people figure it out for themselves. Same can be said about Muslim extremists, they want the world to be a certain way which is the polar opposite of western civilization.
To control countries, the western "elites" use political parties and central banks as the main ways to control society.. That's why we have political parties funded by the super rich, if you don't tote the party line you don't get elected and will never be given credabilty in the mainstream media. Doesn't matter if your left or right winger, follow the money and it all gets traced back to the elite..
Take for example the occupy Wall Street movement, that was nothing more than people answering ads on craigslist for money to protest.. It wasn't a true grassroots movement but a manufactured one, and yes there was probably some honest people that participated once it got going but that was a small percent.

In regards to Iraq, the powers that be saw an opening in public opinion and went for it.. There was no legit reason to invade Iraq at the time except for it was a perfect time to install pro-western themes..

In the year 2000 there was only a few countries without a central bank affiliated with the IMF. Those countries were Iraq, Iran, Korea, Sudan, Syria, Afghanistan and now most of those countries have been invaded and have central banking links..

To the average person like me or you, this stuff doesn't really effect us too much, but to the people that actually live in these places, it impacts their entire life..

There is a long list of events/evidence of ruling parties doing what's best for them and not actually tending to the needs of the people they are suppose to represent..

Zionists.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

How huge? Because the war in Iraq cost the USA between $1.5 - 2 trillion.

It's total nonsense wars are started to make profit. Wars are extremely expensive.



Zionists.

Your looking at it from the wrong perspective.. Yes it's expensive for the governments ie taxpayers, but the money used is borrowed at interest from central banks and is spent buying products and services from massive corporations that are owned/controlled by highly influential individuals.

A lot of people make incredible amounts of money of war..
Oil companies get to charge more for gas at your local pump.
Defense contractors
Bankers and banks are getting interest from massive loans
All the factories that supply war goods like ammo, jeeps, radios etc
Stock market goes down and panics the public but in reality it's just in discount and the super wealthy are able to gobble up huge amounts of stock for cheap, while the public is mostly scared.
Lots of profit to be made in war, just none for the regular citizens

[Weltschmerz]

It's time for another intervention. Bomb the shit out of this country again.

[Weltschmerz]

I did a thread about these maniac psychos some days ago, let me repost.

......

ISIS is a group of radical hardline militants that has grown out of the al-Qaeda structure. In vastly simplified terms, al-Qaeda is an amalgam of different jihadist groups active in various regions, each with their own command structure but all ostensibly answering to al-Qaeda's core leadership, led by Ayman al-Zawahri.

As the BBC describes in their profile of the group, the formation of ISIS was announced in April of 2013, when the group was presented as a merger between the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), an al-Qaeda affiliate, and the Syrian jihadist rebel group, Jabhat al-Nusra. Soon after the announcement however, the Nusra front rejected the merger, and al-Qaeda's core leadership as well denied the alliance.

The new organization went ahead anyway as ISIS, led by a man named Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and carried out a number of vicious attacks in Syria and Iraq. In June of last year the group was ordered by al-Qaeda's core to leave Syria, but the militants and their leader publicly rejected the order. As the New York Times explains, the move was a "watershed moment in the vast decentralization of al-Qaeda and its ideology since 9/11."

After the intial break with al-Qaeda's central authority, which was eventually formalized in January of this year, ISIS quickly accumulated power. As Liz Sly reports in her excellent profile of the group for the Washington Post, the group's rapid rise was in no small part due to their ability to recruit thousands of militant volunteers who had flocked to Syria in recent months.

Sly also notes that the ascendant ISIS began to hold a unique position within Syria, establishing itself not only as a group that fought against government forces but one that established control over its seized territory. In the areas under its control, ISIS carried out a number of atrocities, imposing radical Islamic laws and sometimes sharing the evidence of their brutalizing on social media.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5481290.html