Originally posted by JAB5239
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would boxing be as exciting without.....
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by kardsufur View PostPredictable technique, you avoid my allegations while asking a "leading" type question of your own then accuse me of avoiding it when it's completely irrelevant. Owned once again. You're boring and insecure
Comment
-
Originally posted by kardsufur View Postwhy do you run and make a poll everytime you get owned in an argument by someone. It's really childish tbh. Constantly having other people back up and 'validate' your opinion via a poll just shows how insecure you are about your own views
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by House of Stone View PostWhy this is even a poll ... no real boxing fan would ever suggest that boxing would be better without bodyshots
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostSo Im having a debate with a poster here and he says as fighters have a high workrate they don't need to work the body to be exciting. Imagine the Gatti-Ward fights with no body punching. Holyfield-Bowe, Frazier against Ali, Hearns-Barkley or any JCC fight with no body punching. Would they have been nearly as exciting? Working the body not only slows the other fighter down its an integral part of opening up head shots. Vote and discuss please.
Every match can be hooks and uppercuts to the head!!!
Comment
Comment