Automatically?
Longevity.
Doesn't really trump him IMO.
Doesn't really trump him IMO.
His unbeaten record isn't what qualifies him as great IMO. It adds it it but it isn't the be all and end all. I would still rank him in the same place I do right now if he was 1-1 with Charles.
But did the others? No.
Being well on your way and getting knocked unconcious isn't close to winning.
Not being stopped on cuts isn't either.
Being well on your way and getting knocked unconcious isn't close to winning.
Not being stopped on cuts isn't either.
So?
It still doesn't change the regard that Marciano is held in.
It still doesn't change the regard that Marciano is held in.
Disagree.
Who? Archie Moore?
Not really.
With or without a loss to Charles he'd still have that Aura.
With or without a loss to Charles he'd still have that Aura.
My whole argument that's being refuted he would be in their calibre. As argubaly the greatest of all time.
But, you're saying a win like this infact does put him in the same sentance as Robinson, Greb and Langford.
Doesn't that prove my point?
But, you're saying a win like this infact does put him in the same sentance as Robinson, Greb and Langford.
Doesn't that prove my point?
Disagree.
Comment