I perused through the thread of the link you provided. 1st thing I noticed was that apparently I cant reply to ANY of the guys comments. Lol
2nd, he does seem to possess a certain degree of passion for the sport and above average ability to fact check and cross reference, but IMO missed the crucial reason why the "eye test" cant be ignored. Regardless of opposition, the "eye test" is evidence of a fighters actual boxing abilities that he has displayed up to the time where a match may prove otherwise(usually the crossroads ends up being mostly about a fighters chin IMO). He basically answered it himself in a reply where he questioned "why isn't Deontay Wilder on a P4P list"? He lacks a lot of fundamental skills for one, and 2nd I don't believe he has passed an "eye test" of any credible boxing observer.
2nd, he does seem to possess a certain degree of passion for the sport and above average ability to fact check and cross reference, but IMO missed the crucial reason why the "eye test" cant be ignored. Regardless of opposition, the "eye test" is evidence of a fighters actual boxing abilities that he has displayed up to the time where a match may prove otherwise(usually the crossroads ends up being mostly about a fighters chin IMO). He basically answered it himself in a reply where he questioned "why isn't Deontay Wilder on a P4P list"? He lacks a lot of fundamental skills for one, and 2nd I don't believe he has passed an "eye test" of any credible boxing observer.